R/C Tech Forums

Go Back   R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-15-2005, 03:38 PM   #2686
Tech Elite
 
ChrisP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Shelby Twp, MI
Posts: 2,047
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rraden
Amazing, Xray sells the car with a 2.5mm chassis then sells you a 3.0mm for carpet and a 2.0mm for ashpalt! Makes you wonder what the 2.5mm was made for doesn't it.
The stock chassis will work for 90-99% of the people who buy it in 90-99% of their applications....

People WILL make aftermarket parts for every car..whether it needs them or not since there is a LARGE portion of the RC community that will buy option parts becaue they are available...expecting that they NEED them...when in reality they don't.....

Xray decided that they would take part...if people are going to buy extra parts one way or the other...why not give them an option of sticking with Xray?
ChrisP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2005, 06:33 PM   #2687
Tech Elite
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 2,520
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rraden
Amazing, Xray sells the car with a 2.5mm chassis then sells you a 3.0mm for carpet and a 2.0mm for ashpalt! Makes you wonder what the 2.5mm was made for doesn't it.
the 2.5 mm chassis is for racing on carpshpalt
DOTMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2005, 07:37 PM   #2688
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Diego, Ca.
Posts: 1,024
Trader Rating: 29 (100%+)
Default

I just wonder, except in extreme track conditions, and maybe even then. with all the different ways to run the car (stand offs, all or some of them, soft thru stiff top plates), plus all the other things you can adjust, how many of us think we could really tell the difference in .5 thickness of the chassi............
Mdoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2005, 07:52 PM   #2689
Tech Addict
 
Scho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 584
Send a message via MSN to Scho
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DOTMAN
the 2.5 mm chassis is for racing on carpshpalt

Yup, like 3% of all xray uses will get any use out of the 3mm or 2mm chassis
Scho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2005, 08:25 PM   #2690
Tech Elite
 
howard hudson's Avatar
R/C Tech Charter Subscriber
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: some damned place called Iowa
Posts: 4,245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scho
Yup, like 3% of all xray uses will get any use out of the 3mm or 2mm chassis
I would rather see the spool return as a option part then a discontinued part
__________________
what the heck is r/c car??? ( said in your best redneck voice)

'OL BUZZARD FARMING (lol)
howard hudson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2005, 08:40 PM   #2691
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,300
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Would a slotted top-plate not work just as well as a thinner chassis on lower-grip surfaces? Much less expensive and much easier to change. I knew that I noticed a difference on carpet with low traction when I switched to one on my EVO2 - wonder what the change will be on the FK05.
duckman996 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2005, 09:15 PM   #2692
Tech Elite
 
howard hudson's Avatar
R/C Tech Charter Subscriber
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: some damned place called Iowa
Posts: 4,245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by duckman996
Would a slotted top-plate not work just as well as a thinner chassis on lower-grip surfaces? Much less expensive and much easier to change. I knew that I noticed a difference on carpet with low traction when I switched to one on my EVO2 - wonder what the change will be on the FK05.
I have removed the front uprights on my 05 to gain more flex on a low grip track/ such as dusty pk lot tracks. seemed to help
__________________
what the heck is r/c car??? ( said in your best redneck voice)

'OL BUZZARD FARMING (lol)
howard hudson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2005, 09:31 PM   #2693
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Diego, Ca.
Posts: 1,024
Trader Rating: 29 (100%+)
Default

exactly right Duckman....there are so many tuning options we can all try before having to buy thicker or thinner chassis.....most of us could probably save more time just being turn marshalled one less time, than we could find if we had all the options available and Jurage was tuning our car, while Gilles coached us from the drivers stand lol...one thing to remember, the team guys that run r and d or special parts, are the ones that rarly make mistakes, so they are looking for a way to pick up an extra tenth or two in a 5 min. race, usually enough to move from the middle to the top of the A main, as I said above lol one less mistake from most of us would be a few seconds, not tenths
Mdoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2005, 09:37 PM   #2694
Tech Elite
 
L.Fairtrace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Beyond the Wall
Posts: 3,774
Trader Rating: 23 (100%+)
Send a message via AIM to L.Fairtrace
Default

I had my car pretty dialed on high bite asphalt last weekend. I was using the 2.5mm chassis, wide topdeck with all 4 posts. I tried with no posts and it was unpredictable on power in the turns. So I tried all 4 and it was much, much better and way more consistent.

I also agree with Mdoc. You can shave .2 off each lap with all the tuning parts but if you have a 4 second wreck it was all pointless.
__________________
Awesomatix USA - EaMotorsports - RocheUSA - MonTech - Sanwa - BSR Racing Tires - TQ Wire - Solaris Racing Tires - Side Piece Racing

180 and 360 Raceway. Best on the East Coast. Take your pick
L.Fairtrace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2005, 09:39 PM   #2695
Tech Master
 
centax error!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: " Burn Rubber, Not your wallet! "
Posts: 1,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by howard hudson
I would rather see the spool return as a option part then a discontinued part

yeah ... a spool made of Hudy spring steel instead of duraluminum
centax error! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2005, 10:23 PM   #2696
Tech Elite
 
howard hudson's Avatar
R/C Tech Charter Subscriber
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: some damned place called Iowa
Posts: 4,245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by centax error!
yeah ... a spool made of Hudy spring steel instead of duraluminum
that makes me think ?? i know some one with a CNC machine
__________________
what the heck is r/c car??? ( said in your best redneck voice)

'OL BUZZARD FARMING (lol)
howard hudson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2005, 10:55 PM   #2697
Tech Regular
 
Qwiglee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ventura, CA
Posts: 313
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by howard hudson
I have removed the front uprights on my 05 to gain more flex on a low grip track/ such as dusty pk lot tracks. seemed to help
I agree, I did the same thing and it worked well. I also removed 2 of the 4 screws that attach the rear of the upper deck. I heard that the Xray drivers were experimenting with this at the Reedy race.
__________________
Brian Aldridge
Qwiglee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2005, 02:42 AM   #2698
Tech Addict
 
JohnMatrix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Newark, CA
Posts: 608
Send a message via AIM to JohnMatrix
Default

any shops got the 2.0 chassis for sale?
JohnMatrix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2005, 03:54 AM   #2699
Tech Addict
 
Scho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 584
Send a message via MSN to Scho
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by L.Fairtrace
I had my car pretty dialed on high bite asphalt last weekend. I was using the 2.5mm chassis, wide topdeck with all 4 posts. I tried with no posts and it was unpredictable on power in the turns. So I tried all 4 and it was much, much better and way more consistent.

I also agree with Mdoc. You can shave .2 off each lap with all the tuning parts but if you have a 4 second wreck it was all pointless.
Yup on high bite surfaces posts are worth leaving in
Scho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2005, 03:56 AM   #2700
Tech Addict
 
Scho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 584
Send a message via MSN to Scho
Default

Just actually in the progress oof switching back to Xray, a few people over here have been taking a coulpe of screws out of the bulkheads under the car.
Scho is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTB: NIB Xray T1FK05 & Xray Teflon coated aluminum Shock Body Adam.A Australia Wanted to Buy 4 01-02-2007 03:30 PM
WTB: Xray T1FK05 & Xray Teflon coated aluminum Shock Body Adam.A R/C Items: Wanted to Buy 1 12-30-2006 03:26 PM
Xray T1FK05 $100.00 Charles R/C Items: For Sale/Trade 2 04-25-2006 10:51 AM
F/S: Xray T1FK05 ewippler R/C Items: For Sale/Trade 12 12-09-2005 04:03 PM
WTB: Xray T1FK05 ewippler R/C Items: Wanted to Buy 4 05-06-2005 06:40 AM



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -7. It is currently 07:13 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.2.1
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Advertise Content © 2001-2011 RCTech.net