Like Tree1Likes

Xray T3 2012

Old 06-23-2012, 07:09 AM
  #2881  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (15)
 
defcone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,356
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by or8ital View Post
Why not just use a narrower hex? Would it not be the same net result?
A lot is different when you narrow the block when compared to a narrower hex, even if not by much(dependant on how much you grind off).
defcone is offline  
Old 06-23-2012, 07:31 AM
  #2882  
Tech Elite
 
Skiddins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Windsor, UK
Posts: 4,914
Default

Originally Posted by or8ital View Post
Why not just use a narrower hex? Would it not be the same net result?
Not quite, when you remove material from the blocks you are changing the suspension geometry as well as the width.

The wishbone position, upper link length & roll centre etc will all change.

Changing the hexes only changes the roll centre.
Skiddins is offline  
Old 06-23-2012, 08:20 AM
  #2883  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (83)
 
pchroma24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 518
Trader Rating: 83 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by or8ital View Post
Why not just use a narrower hex? Would it not be the same net result?
Not exactly, when the upper camber link is run in position 1 (outters most, closest to wheel) , as most of Hagbergs setups indicate, it will make the upper link abit shorter, which then makes camber rise abit quicker... It's a geometry change not so much a track width adjustment... Hope it helps...
pchroma24 is offline  
Old 06-23-2012, 08:57 AM
  #2884  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (21)
 
rdlkgliders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: So. Cal High Desert Hobbies
Posts: 460
Trader Rating: 21 (96%+)
Default

won't running the camber link in it's outermost position (closest to wheel) make it longer ?
Do you mean after the mod it will become shorter than before the mod creating the quick camber gain.
rdlkgliders is offline  
Old 06-23-2012, 09:14 AM
  #2885  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (83)
 
pchroma24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 518
Trader Rating: 83 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by rdlkgliders View Post
won't running the camber link in it's outermost position (closest to wheel) make it longer ?
Do you mean after the mod it will become shorter than before the mod creating the quick camber gain.
Apologies for the confusion... I was meaning the inner mounting on the bulkhead closest to the wheel, should be position 1? (Not in front of a setup sheet, LOL) ,... You'd maintain the inner mounting on the hub as well... Making the link as short as possible
pchroma24 is offline  
Old 06-24-2012, 06:59 AM
  #2886  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (8)
 
NolanP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Westmont
Posts: 2,433
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

How wide or narrow are you running your front end?
NolanP is offline  
Old 06-24-2012, 06:22 PM
  #2887  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
elee32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: lambertville, nj
Posts: 788
Trader Rating: 18 (100%+)
Default

May have been brought up already but, are there any advantages to running 50mm driveshafts in the rear?
elee32 is offline  
Old 06-24-2012, 07:57 PM
  #2888  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (8)
 
NolanP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Westmont
Posts: 2,433
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by elee32 View Post
May have been brought up already but, are there any advantages to running 50mm driveshafts in the rear?
Yes you can narrow the rear end which will help the car come around the corner. It will make it less stable though.
NolanP is offline  
Old 06-25-2012, 12:30 AM
  #2889  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (15)
 
kinga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 614
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by silvalis View Post
This mod makes the rear of the car quite a lot narrower which results in more turn-in and mid corner rotation. The car will be more aggressive and difficult to drive but faster for some conditions.

http://hagberg.blogs.se/2012/01/18/r...tion-12479898/
Rather than hacking up your susp blocks, you can use these holders
http://rcmarket.com.hk/product_info....ducts_id=13037
That way you can use low, mid or high susp blocks without hacking them up.
I tested these today and they work a treat, it is only a .5mm thinner though, but the benefit is it is reversible side to side, so you can run in the -0.5 configuration (1mm total trackwidth reduction) or in the normal configuration.
The other benefit is you can use the separate rear-front suspention holders that you remove from the rear, in the front-rear position instead of the one peice holder, and increase steering at the same time and make front belt changes much easier

Last edited by kinga; 06-25-2012 at 05:44 AM.
kinga is offline  
Old 06-25-2012, 07:45 AM
  #2890  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (32)
 
syndr0me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 5280 Raceway
Posts: 13,269
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

I'd sure like to see an option like that from XRay. It gets us that much closer to toe blocks though, I guess.
syndr0me is offline  
Old 06-25-2012, 07:50 AM
  #2891  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Chrissy C's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: U.k (Essex)
Posts: 307
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Syndr0me, if those adjustments float your boat then the Exotek chassis conversion set allows you to use different toe blocks so that you can alter the track width.

There is another thread on here specifically for it where the widths of blocks etc are listed.
Chrissy C is offline  
Old 06-25-2012, 08:11 AM
  #2892  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (15)
 
M-Technic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 2,562
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by syndr0me View Post
I'd sure like to see an option like that from XRay. It gets us that much closer to toe blocks though, I guess.
If they could make those out of the same molded plastic, it would be a lot cheaper than stocking a bunch of different toe block widths like I had to when I ran Tamiya.
M-Technic is offline  
Old 06-25-2012, 09:37 AM
  #2893  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (21)
 
rdlkgliders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: So. Cal High Desert Hobbies
Posts: 460
Trader Rating: 21 (96%+)
Default

what is the preferred low traction asphalt chassis combo? I have been running on low traction tight tracks with the VBC flex and it did not take the basic asphalt setup with positive results. I have it pretty dialed now. what is preferred the 2.0 xray, the exotek, vbc or other
rdlkgliders is offline  
Old 06-25-2012, 10:21 AM
  #2894  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 8
Default

Originally Posted by kinga View Post
Rather than hacking up your susp blocks, you can use these holder
That way you can use low, mid or high susp blocks without hacking them up.
I tested these today and they work a treat, it is only a .5mm thinner though, but the benefit is it is reversible side to side, so you can run in the -0.5 configuration (1mm total trackwidth reduction) or in the normal configuration.
The other benefit is you can use the separate rear-front suspention holders that you remove from the rear, in the front-rear position instead of the one peice holder, and increase steering at the same time and make front belt changes much easier
If you put the seperate suspension holders in in the front -rear position you better order some replacement chassis....
nevergiveup is offline  
Old 06-25-2012, 04:53 PM
  #2895  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (8)
 
NolanP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Westmont
Posts: 2,433
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

I personally would rather just mill them down myself and know they are correct and be able to run any of the adjustable blocks vs just the one set.
NolanP is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.