Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
What is the ideal TC internal ratio? >

What is the ideal TC internal ratio?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

What is the ideal TC internal ratio?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-06-2011, 07:02 AM
  #1  
Tech Master
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: santa monica / manchester
Posts: 1,426
Default What is the ideal TC internal ratio?

Hi All

I am modifying a car, and at the moment am looking what pulleys to fit on it.

What is the ideal IR for a brushless TC?

Also does Pulley size matter when achieving a IR? i.e if the IR of 2 was ideal, would you be better to use a 32t diff pulley and a 16t layshaft, or a 40t diff pulley and a 20t layshaft pulley.

Thanks

Last edited by Qatmix; 05-06-2011 at 07:16 AM. Reason: I meant IR not FDR
Qatmix is offline  
Old 05-06-2011, 07:11 AM
  #2  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (73)
 
MikeXray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 5,755
Trader Rating: 73 (100%+)
Default

there is no such thing, its is motor dependent, most brushless motors operate in the 3.0-8.0 fdr range, how the pulleys are split do not make a difference as long as front and rear achieve the same ratio.
MikeXray is offline  
Old 05-06-2011, 07:11 AM
  #3  
Tech Fanatic
 
SteveP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 919
Default

It's difficult to answer with the information that you've provided. There are so many things that factor into what the proper gearing should be. Motor choice, track surface, track length, track layout, etc. To answer the second part of your question, my preference is to use larger pulleys. With more teeth engaging the belt, there's less stress on the belt, less likelihood to skip, and it's slightly more efficient.
SteveP is offline  
Old 05-06-2011, 07:23 AM
  #4  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (73)
 
MikeXray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 5,755
Trader Rating: 73 (100%+)
Default

I see you updated to IR, still the same argument, xray has this option, I don't know anyone that could prove one was faster, some felt it was "punchier" but that was just to justify the $100 they just spent, lol. I believe the option is more useful to position the motor relative to the spur.
MikeXray is offline  
Old 05-06-2011, 07:23 AM
  #5  
Tech Master
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: santa monica / manchester
Posts: 1,426
Default

ahem I actually meant Internal ratio. (Just been to the pub for lunch)
Qatmix is offline  
Old 05-06-2011, 07:27 AM
  #6  
Tech Master
 
daleburr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 1,090
Default

The internal ratio is irelevant, the motor only cares about the overall drive ratio. Manufacturers who put stuff on their website about having the "ideal internal ratio" are talking nonsense.

What does matter is the size of the pulleys. The original cyclone had 16t layshaft pulleys and these would wear out quickly and chew the belts up. My Yokomo BD and TC6 have 20t layshaft pulleys and never have any issues with belts and pulleys.

I think ideally the bigger the pulley the better, but this gives issues with space and diff height, so there is a limit. The 40t diffs on the TC6 already sit in slots in the chassis, so you couldn't go any bigger without raising the diffs and comprimising the handling.

If I was building a car I'd go with 20t layshafts and 40t diffs. The two cars I've had with this setup have been faultless on the transmissions.
daleburr is offline  
Old 05-06-2011, 11:52 AM
  #7  
Tech Rookie
 
BefLipsRustler9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: TitTown, NE
Posts: 12
Default

Touring cars with dynamic ESC timing on carpet tracks (17.5 motor) aim for a 5.5 - 7 FDR... depending on track conditions, traction, etc
BefLipsRustler9 is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.