Witch 17.5 motor to buy....
#31
i ran one for a little bit as a temporary thing since i blew up my Duo 1,2, i dont remember which one it was, but i didnt like it that much, it was fast but for me it didnt feel right, it didnt feel smooth to me.
#32
Tech Lord
iTrader: (32)
This is a good effort to gather and distribute information pertinent to hardware and results: http://rcprogear.com/
The new 1S version of the SPv3 motors seem pretty decent in 2S applications.
#33
Tech Master
iTrader: (10)
I've tried both Ballistics and SSs in boost and non-boost, and I simply couldn't get them to work how I wanted. It was either good horsepower but terrible powerband or super smooth but lacking some oomph. I've owned 3 Putnam Duo 2's and they were amazing, so this week I bought a Putnam Duo 3 and will test it out Sunday
I highly considered the new TP, but I decided to stick with what has worked for me before. A fast friend of mine mentioned that he didn't feel like the TP liked being in a heavy TC but that it ran great in 1/12.
I highly considered the new TP, but I decided to stick with what has worked for me before. A fast friend of mine mentioned that he didn't feel like the TP liked being in a heavy TC but that it ran great in 1/12.
#34
It's easy to overweight results from a single race, or to ignore a herd mentality among racers, but the results from 'Birds are pretty interesting.
This is a good effort to gather and distribute information pertinent to hardware and results: http://rcprogear.com/
This is a good effort to gather and distribute information pertinent to hardware and results: http://rcprogear.com/
#35
Tech Addict
Removed
#37
I'd go with a sp v3 use for 1s, it's definitely lighter and can be use for 2s. Check out cyruls thread.
#40
#42
#44