Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Thoughts about rumores of a Losi XXX-S II >

Thoughts about rumores of a Losi XXX-S II

Thoughts about rumores of a Losi XXX-S II

Old 09-25-2004, 07:26 PM
  #361  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ridin my Harley
Posts: 707
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally posted by T. Hodge
X
Adam Hartzell is offline  
Old 09-25-2004, 07:27 PM
  #362  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (56)
 
PaintingRoly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I got your force right here
Posts: 2,822
Trader Rating: 56 (100%+)
Default

I heard they are coming out with all new spring for the new shocks because the old one will be too wide.
PaintingRoly is offline  
Old 09-25-2004, 07:46 PM
  #363  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: indiana
Posts: 242
Default

I'd rather see them keep the same springs, but if they came out with a new better shock then it'll be worth the change. Just wish we could find out soon. So i could figure out what stuff to keep. Lol
dasupacat is offline  
Old 09-25-2004, 07:47 PM
  #364  
Tech Addict
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Nebraska USA
Posts: 615
Default I'm still skeptical about this....

chassis design. I remember all the Pro 3 problems and the lack of punch of the Street Weapon. If it has a lay shaft, bigger/longer diffs that means more drivetrain mass. That is the last thing a belted TC needs. With all the shaft drive TCs the XXX-S was the freest belted drive train out there. My question is will a center mass design out weigh drive train mass issues? I guess time will tell. I could see it flop at the local level and that's the meat of it.

Last edited by Nightbreed; 09-25-2004 at 07:52 PM.
Nightbreed is offline  
Old 09-25-2004, 07:52 PM
  #365  
R/C Tech Founder
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Del Mar, CA, USA
Posts: 7,063
Default

The Pro 3's problems were mainly related to chassis flex and suspension slop, and not really because of the layout. And the car never seemed to be in widespread use enough for people to really put it to the test.
futureal is offline  
Old 09-25-2004, 07:53 PM
  #366  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dallas,Texas
Posts: 459
Default

it wont be a big deal with mod
mtc3od is offline  
Old 09-25-2004, 07:56 PM
  #367  
Tech Initiate
 
KKKWAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 42
Default Re: I'm still skeptical about this....

Originally posted by Nightbreed
chassis design. I remember all the Pro 3 problems and the lack of punch of the Street Weapon. If it has a lay shaft, bigger/longer diffs that means more drivetrain mass. That is the last thing a belted TC needs. With all the shaft drive TCs the XXX-S was the freest belted drive train out there. My question is will a center mass design out weigh drive train mass issues? I guess time will tell. I could see it flop at the local level and that's the meat of it.
The old Street Weapon is 3 belt driven, right?
KKKWAN is offline  
Old 09-25-2004, 08:00 PM
  #368  
Tech Elite
 
fatdoggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: MD USA
Posts: 3,642
Default

As far as I can see Losi hasn't made the mistakes hpi did. The drivetrain is very free and I doubt there will be any weight issues. Coolest part of the whole car is the battery setup. Also the shocks are VERY smooth. Hopefully I'll see it on the track this wednesday or next saturday.
fatdoggy is offline  
Old 09-25-2004, 08:02 PM
  #369  
Tech Addict
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Nebraska USA
Posts: 615
Default Ya, Losi has always...

developed their TCs for mod use. It's a catch 22 though for Losi, since local racing seems to be more stock. locals will stay with the shaft drive advantages. Do you go for more local sales or build a car for the bigger sweeping tracks at the big racing level? It's a hard choice.
Nightbreed is offline  
Old 09-25-2004, 08:08 PM
  #370  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
SCIDA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wildomar, CA
Posts: 345
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Im sure LOSI did not pull this design out of thin air. I am sure they did hundreds of hours of testing to get the design they wanted. Knowing that they like to do things differently, it probably has at least the same efficiency as the X-Ray. So why not go with something that looks completely different. I remember some of the same people in here that were the BIG skeptics when the XXXS came out and were saying that the drive train was not good enough because of the one long belt and this and that. They would not have changed the design so drastically if they didn't think it was better. Knowing they could have saved some of the molds from the XXXS and incorporated then into a new design. The LITTLE Losi driver that could, that I know is very excited about it and he runs more batteries than just about anyone since Masami.

P.S. They design cars that are equally good for both stock and MOD. Not just MOD. The XXXS is great for both, it was just heavy. The new car will be under weight right out of the box most likely.
SCIDA is offline  
Old 09-25-2004, 08:12 PM
  #371  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
NVisible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,188
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

so this is going to be an RTR release, possibly followed by a graphite version? or is it already graphite?.

btw
pics or you are all liars
NVisible is offline  
Old 09-25-2004, 08:14 PM
  #372  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: indiana
Posts: 242
Default

Originally posted by fatdoggy
As far as I can see Losi hasn't made the mistakes hpi did. The drivetrain is very free and I doubt there will be any weight issues. Coolest part of the whole car is the battery setup. Also the shocks are VERY smooth. Hopefully I'll see it on the track this wednesday or next saturday.
So the shocks are a new design?
dasupacat is offline  
Old 09-25-2004, 08:17 PM
  #373  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 639
Default

*cough bladder shocks
craziracer is offline  
Old 09-25-2004, 08:26 PM
  #374  
Tech Elite
 
fatdoggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: MD USA
Posts: 3,642
Default

I've already said enough. I'm sure pics will be posted soon.
fatdoggy is offline  
Old 09-25-2004, 08:38 PM
  #375  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dallas,Texas
Posts: 459
Default

when?
mtc3od is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.