Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree16Likes

Serpent S411

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-19-2012, 05:25 AM
  #4231  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (9)
 
dawgmeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 2,813
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

All this shock talk, just get the TRF's and rock on.

http://www.exotekracing.com/dampener...ollar-for-trf/



http://www.speedtechrc.com/store/ebp...d=966&id=12310


http://www.rc-mushroom.com/product_i...oating-p-13175
Attached Thumbnails Serpent S411-photo3.jpg   Serpent S411-photo.jpg  
dawgmeat is offline  
Old 09-19-2012, 05:30 AM
  #4232  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
masterhit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 481
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by cwoods34
Tower also sells "packs" of aluminum screws (10?) in a variety of sizes. I bought 3x6/3x8 countersunk for chassis pieces, 3x6 buttonhead for the upper deck and other parts, and an assortment of the cap head screws that use a larger hex for rhe bulkheads.
http://www.fastener-express.com/alum...s-washers.aspx

Awesome place and service.

Mike Slaughter
masterhit is offline  
Old 09-19-2012, 06:18 AM
  #4233  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (15)
 
TimPotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Boynton Beach Fl > Randoph NJ
Posts: 7,486
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

If you guys want to shave weight, then mount up some of the plastic parts from the "Sport Kit", like the swaybar holder. and as mentioned before, the spool. The plastic bearing blocks look like they would bolt right up as well. ( edit ) - forgot the plastic shock bodies as well.

Aluminum screws on the bottom, you guys are more hardcore then me. I would run ti up top and steel on the bottom, keep the weight as low as possible, and the steel are a ton more durable on the bottom.

Trackrods.... yeah. I have not had any luck with those ( Al ). I tend to hit pretty hard ( total commitment to the line - even if it is a bad one ) and I bend the aluminum ones.. I prefer Ti or Spring Steel.

No matter how light your car is... your still last if you can not finsih the run.
TimPotter is offline  
Old 09-19-2012, 06:30 AM
  #4234  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (15)
 
TimPotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Boynton Beach Fl > Randoph NJ
Posts: 7,486
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

Couple of pics, finally got the electronics in the car.

Trying to build a cost effective racer.

TQ Monkey Servo - MK811 - $50
Reventon R Speedo - $62
411 Sport - Not sure what the retail on this yet...
Attached Thumbnails Serpent S411-411-sport.jpg   Serpent S411-411-sport-2.jpg  
TimPotter is offline  
Old 09-19-2012, 06:39 AM
  #4235  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Toughbeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Posts: 509
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by TimPotter
Couple of pics, finally got the electronics in the car.

Trying to build a cost effective racer.

TQ Monkey Servo - MK811 - $50
Reventon R Speedo - $62
411 Sport - Not sure what the retail on this yet...
we are selling the 411 Sport for 224 USD FYI
Toughbeard is offline  
Old 09-19-2012, 06:42 AM
  #4236  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Toughbeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Posts: 509
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

I am not sure why people are looking for a different shock. Serpent ones works perfectly fine once they are built correctly
Toughbeard is offline  
Old 09-19-2012, 06:50 AM
  #4237  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (15)
 
TimPotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Boynton Beach Fl > Randoph NJ
Posts: 7,486
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

Agreed, If the shocks were garbage, then I would say throw some tamiya's on. But these shocks are good. It not like they work like the old Schumacher shocks...



Originally Posted by Toughbeard
I am not sure why people are looking for a different shock. Serpent ones works perfectly fine once they are built correctly
TimPotter is offline  
Old 09-19-2012, 06:59 AM
  #4238  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Toughbeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Posts: 509
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by TimPotter
It not like they work like the old Schumacher shocks...
they actually worked ???
Toughbeard is offline  
Old 09-19-2012, 07:04 AM
  #4239  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
 
TryHard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 5,386
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

So this past weekend was the Queensland state titles... to say it was, at times, a perplexing weekend would be an understatement!
The main issue was that the track was super sensitive to temperature, with a only a few degrees of temperature difference causing a large change in balance and laptimes...
Anyway, made some progress during the weekend, and did manage to make progress forward to a more consistent balance.

Friday was practise, and the I basically started out with the car as the weekend before. Admitaly, I wasn't very happy with how it had been but needed to start somewhere, and also provide a reference for the changes I wan't to work through on my list!
As expected the car was the same as it had been in the previous week, being ok on entry, struggling to rotate mid-corner, and then pushing on exit. The worst bit was that if adding in a little more steering to overcome the exit push, it would step out.

Anyway, having had some discussions with Ryan Maker during the week, and looking at a lot of other cars, realised that the standard rear link setup on the car is quite short, as the inner hub position is well inside the wheel rim. This would have a big effect on the camber change on the car. Doing some bench testing and comparing the two link positions, it became pretty apparent that with the short link, there was a pretty non-linear camber gain, with a lot of change happening at the top of the suspension travel. With the long link, there wasn't as much change, but it was also a lot more linear change.
In theory, that should make the car a bit less sensitive in roll, and not 'dumping' the grip when at full travel.

So, the first change was to go with that. It was a definite improvement, the car becoming a lot more driveable off the corner. However, the exit push was still there, and the lack of rotation in the middle was hurting times a lot. With a couple of changes to the rear roll bar and rear shocks, this improved matters a lot. It did make me wonder that a lot of the settings I had been using were simply a compromise to try and rectify the issue with the link.

Next up, to try and help the rotation some more, I went back to the BD7 style motor mount with raised top-deck... and this is where I think my weekend fell apart a bit! For whatever reason, in that run it worked really well, freeing up the car on power again, so I decided to keep it on the car, which with the benefit of hindsight was a mistake... but I'll come back to that!

For the rest of Friday, I made some fairly sweeping changes to the car, but couldn't really get it how I wanted, so ended up back almost where I started, bar the above changes.

On the saturday, the car was good in the first two rounds of practise, on old tyres it worked well and I achieved my first sub 20s laps, getting down to a 19.88...and having droped to a 2.5 block on the rear. Again with hingsight, this was track morning happy hour, having had a number of runs, but without the heat having built up...

First round of qualy, car was sliding all over the place on new boots, the 2.5 block just not bitting enough. Managed to put in a consistent run (removing the two worst laps, was down at .19 split of fastest to average!), which was good enough for 8th overall, but had dropped a lot speed compared to practise. Car also felt like it was a bit soft, not really carrying too much corner speed.

For the second round, I put the 3.0 block back on, and switched to Ride Blues. An improvement for sure, as ducked back under the 20s laps, but it did feel like the car lost steering as well, compared to practise. Another 8th in round though

Third round, after much bugging, I switched full bore to Ryan's latest settings, with the single exception of keeping the Ride Blues (as they were faster than HPI silvers when backed to backed on a previous occasions, because of the bumps). This was a big change, including dropping the front blocks, changing the camber link height's, and switching to less rear toe as well.
Car did feel nice to drive on track, with a good balance... but looking at the times, I'd dropped 0.2's a lap, losing 4second over the run. Thanks to the joys of round by round, actually ended up couting it as a 6th though

Fourth round, I put a combination of settings on, going back to raised blocks, and a 3.0 rear block again, and it was also time for new tyres... and they were crap, sliding all over the track, and only coming in after about 3minutes of running. Still managed my 9th, but with lost over 12seconds compared to my best run of the day. Had effectively locked myself into the A, so could try a few more things with the settings now.

In the fifth qualifier, only changes I made was to lower the outer rear link 0.5mm, and also changing additive to CS from Tweak, trying to get it a little more stable... Additive for sure worked, but wasn't so convinced on the link change... But that was the day done, and mission accomplished (A-final), albeit with needing to find more speed if I wanted to move up the rankings.

Overnight, I sat down (in between drinking lots of rum and coke, and having a pizza box throwing contest) and had a contemplating/fiddling moment with the shocks, as for a little while I've been wanting to give the four hole pistons a crack, as they in theory should reduce the pack (initial resistance) in the shock, making them faster to react to bumps. On the bench, 4-450 felt similar in action to the 3-400 I had been running, but with much less initial friction to the movement. So I built up all the shocks with 4holes, and switched to 500f/450r oils to keep the spilt.

First run on sunday morning, and the car did feel good with that setup, riding over the bumps nicely, although also maybe feeling a little underdamped. Unfortunately an un-glued tyre resulted in me ending up in the wall, with a broken rear hub... only run I failed to finish all weekend Laps times seemed ok, but really difficult to tell with the tyre the way it was.

So, onto the finals..I went out on four run old boots for the first final, figuring if they were that crap in the first run, might as well use the old ones first! First final was a bit of a crap fight, having a lot of slow early laps as battling close with people. Times were off where I wanted to be, so (with more hindsight!) new tyres would have been the better option, maybe...

Second final, new tyres it was... along with going back to the standard V2 motor mount setup, in anticipation of the being loose... which didn't happen! Went from doing 20.6's to 20.3's, even with a half broken wing following a 'incident' that made the car very loose in the high speed sweepers. 9th in that one, but with a genuine feeling of taking a step forward with the settings.

Last final, given how the car had been initially in the second, I wanted to give it a bit more steering and mid-corner, so lengthened the front wheelbase (2mm shim from 2.5), adjusted the ackerman to suit (1.5mm), and also dropped the front shocks back to 450. Car was more positive into the corner, and hugging better lines on the sweepers. Promptly put in my best run of the day, and was battling with guys I had consistently been 0.2's a lap off all day, also posting my fastest times of the day in a run where everyone else fell off. Felt very happy with that, and scored a 7th in the leg.

So overall, ended up 9th... but the big picture of the nationals in November at the same track is the target, and I now have a much clearer idea of where to go on settings, and some thing to avoid.

Some further thoughts....
V1/V2 combo mount - This does make the car looser on-power. For high traction tracks, this probably isn't too bad, and even low traction in stock classes I reckon it'll work well... but for mod, low traction, nah. Just makes the car too nervous on the throttle, and need to be very smooth.
Shocks - For me, 4hole pistons are a good option if it's bumpy. Only minor flaw I've seen is that one of the plastic pistons was catching the damper wall slightly. A bit of light sanding solved that, but the machined pistons are on their way already. Heavier oils I am going to try as well.
Chassis flex - Talking to some of the other racers after the meet, appears that the guy who dominated with an Xray, was running a 2.5mm chassis, and getting much heavier springs to work (pink/silver). When I've tried them before, the car has been slower, and not steered as much... however, that's with the 2.25mm and flexi top deck. I've got a 2.0mm top-deck, and a 2.5mm chassis here to try... so one of my cars is going to be re-built in this combo, along with a top deck "tweak" that I need to do.

Other wise, still very happy with the car. It had been a pretty painful few weeks, struggling with the car, and the track, but progress is being made... and the durability is still very good

As a side note, had the second fastest car down the straight, clocked at 91kmh on the speed gun.


Ed
TryHard is offline  
Old 09-19-2012, 07:24 AM
  #4240  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
 
TryHard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 5,386
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

setup - EC QLD2012
TryHard is offline  
Old 09-19-2012, 07:32 AM
  #4241  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Toughbeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Posts: 509
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by TryHard
setup - EC QLD2012
have you tried the Sweep 30PPLS on carpet Ed? works like a charm...

good write up... Thanks for sharing
Toughbeard is offline  
Old 09-19-2012, 08:04 AM
  #4242  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (239)
 
Marcos.J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Semper Fi
Posts: 32,997
Trader Rating: 239 (100%+)
Default

Thanks for that link Starling I need those for my limited edition coming to daytona??

Originally Posted by TimPotter
If you guys want to shave weight, then mount up some of the plastic parts from the "Sport Kit", like the swaybar holder. and as mentioned before, the spool. The plastic bearing blocks look like they would bolt right up as well. ( edit ) - forgot the plastic shock bodies as well.

Aluminum screws on the bottom, you guys are more hardcore then me. I would run ti up top and steel on the bottom, keep the weight as low as possible, and the steel are a ton more durable on the bottom.

Trackrods.... yeah. I have not had any luck with those ( Al ). I tend to hit pretty hard ( total commitment to the line - even if it is a bad one ) and I bend the aluminum ones.. I prefer Ti or Spring Steel.

No matter how light your car is... your still last if you can not finsih the run.
My LE 411 is at 1405grams with everything stock dont need it to be any lighter, well i could run a lightweight body

Originally Posted by TimPotter
Couple of pics, finally got the electronics in the car.

Trying to build a cost effective racer.

TQ Monkey Servo - MK811 - $50
Reventon R Speedo - $62
411 Sport - Not sure what the retail on this yet...

looking good Tim,! racing Daytona?? Got mine set up for MOD there hopefully a few show up for the class
Marcos.J is offline  
Old 09-19-2012, 09:05 AM
  #4243  
Tech Master
iTrader: (10)
 
cwoods34's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Indy-freakin'-ana
Posts: 1,156
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Thanks for the link Slaughter! Just one more place to spend money

Good race writeup...... It doesn't matter the experience level. We ALL benefit when track conditions and setup changes are discussed!

Nothing wrong with Serpent shocks.... I'm just partial to the TRF! They match the blue screws and wiring

I've never had issues with aluminum screws on the bottom.... although with the nylon spool I'll easily have over 30g bolted to the car, so I may swap out the bottoms for steel or stainless to move the weight down.
cwoods34 is offline  
Old 09-19-2012, 09:41 AM
  #4244  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 388
Default

Originally Posted by cwoods34
The aluminum screw set for the TC6 will give you a lot. The TC3/4 sets are standard and won't work. Tower also sells "packs" of aluminum screws (10?) in a variety of sizes. I bought 3x6/3x8 countersunk for chassis pieces, 3x6 buttonhead for the upper deck and other parts, and an assortment of the cap head screws that use a larger hex for rhe bulkheads.

If you can wait till this afternoon I'll link you to each type (PITA to do on my phone).
Thank you. Please do.
I would really like to know which partnumber or partnumbers I should order.
Hope to hear from ya soon...... ;-)

Tip from Chris Kerswell:
The anti-roll bar inserts are a little tight on the bar. It is advisable to use the 1.6mm inserts for the 1.4mm bar and tighten the grubscrew down to remove the play but still keep it free.
I've been searching for a partnumber for the 1.6mm insert. Can't find it anywhere. Suggestions?

Last edited by Kensei; 09-19-2012 at 12:24 PM.
Kensei is offline  
Old 09-19-2012, 12:34 PM
  #4245  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (9)
 
dawgmeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 2,813
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Marcos.J
Thanks for that link Starling I need those for my limited edition coming to daytona??



My LE 411 is at 1405grams with everything stock dont need it to be any lighter, well i could run a lightweight body




looking good Tim,! racing Daytona?? Got mine set up for MOD there hopefully a few show up for the class
Yes I'm I'll be there on the 28th. I'm done with the truck driver gig, no home time at all with the family
dawgmeat is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.