Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Does the receiver step down the voltage .... >

Does the receiver step down the voltage ....

Does the receiver step down the voltage ....

Old 08-12-2004, 06:23 PM
  #1  
Tech Master
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
jag88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,122
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default Does the receiver step down the voltage ....

Does the receiver step down the 7.2 volts for the servo, ESC and personal transponder or does the speed control do it ?
Thanks.
jag88 is offline  
Old 08-12-2004, 06:31 PM
  #2  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 716
Default

The ESC does it.
AE Racer is offline  
Old 08-12-2004, 06:33 PM
  #3  
Tech Master
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
jag88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,122
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

AE Racer , Thanks.
jag88 is offline  
Old 08-12-2004, 07:16 PM
  #4  
Regional Moderator
 
nitrous36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 1,046
Default

Yeah the esc and motor drains the most voltage. It would be nice to have something to distribute the power more evenly where you wanted.
nitrous36 is offline  
Old 08-12-2004, 07:36 PM
  #5  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,636
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

The esc doesn't "drain" hardly any voltage at all. Not sure what you mean when you want the power distributed more evenly.
071crazy is offline  
Old 08-12-2004, 07:38 PM
  #6  
Regional Moderator
 
nitrous36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 1,046
Default

I mean the most of the power is used by the motor and speed controller.
nitrous36 is offline  
Old 08-12-2004, 07:45 PM
  #7  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,636
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

ESC's use much less power in comparison to the motor. It's basically an electronic switch. If you had a mechanical speed control, that would be a different case, since lower speeds are achieved through a resistor.
071crazy is offline  
Old 08-12-2004, 07:55 PM
  #8  
Regional Moderator
 
nitrous36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 1,046
Default

I have both electric and mechanical speed controls and I have noticed the difference in run times.
nitrous36 is offline  
Old 08-12-2004, 08:06 PM
  #9  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,636
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

ok.
071crazy is offline  
Old 08-12-2004, 08:10 PM
  #10  
Tech Regular
 
donoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Daly City, CA
Posts: 264
Default

That's hilarious.
The ESC doesn't take up the power.
The motor is the one taking up 10's of Amps dude.

The runtime difference is because the mechanical SC gives the motor a variable voltage from 7.2 to 0. Electronic ESC's use pulses to drive the motor, but the pulses are always 7.2V strong. The ESC just pulses more often for more power and less often for less power. It's more efficient.

Power distribution is not an issue with RC cars. It is power consumption. Your Servo, ESC, Receiver all take up negligible power compared to the motor.

Donovan
donoman is offline  
Old 08-12-2004, 08:16 PM
  #11  
Regional Moderator
 
nitrous36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 1,046
Default

Thanks. But me and 071crazy have went over that already.
nitrous36 is offline  
Old 08-12-2004, 08:17 PM
  #12  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,636
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

The runtime difference is due to the fact that a resistor drops the voltage to the motor, not because of the fact that it has "variable voltage". Energy is wasted from the resistor heating up.

Conservation of energy. It works.
071crazy is offline  
Old 08-12-2004, 10:29 PM
  #13  
Tech Regular
 
donoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Daly City, CA
Posts: 264
Default

Hey genius, the voltage at the motor terminals varies given the resistance of the mechanical ESC. The resistor value changes, that is why the voltage changes. That's how your motor gets faster and slower. If the voltage wasn't variable you'd have a problem. Don't try to teach me ohm's law kid.

Last edited by donoman; 08-12-2004 at 10:35 PM.
donoman is offline  
Old 08-12-2004, 10:30 PM
  #14  
Tech Regular
 
donoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Daly City, CA
Posts: 264
Default

You are also correct about the energy wasted in the resistor. But if you compare a constant voltage of 3.6 V vs. a 7.2V pulse width modulation at 50% duty cycle you will see you also save energy using the PWM.
donoman is offline  
Old 08-13-2004, 01:36 PM
  #15  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,636
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

What did you do anyways, pick up a physics book and "learn" about ohm's law. Hilarious!!!
071crazy is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.