Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Team Corally RDX Touring Car >

Team Corally RDX Touring Car

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Team Corally RDX Touring Car

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-07-2006, 02:38 PM
  #5671  
Tech Master
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,850
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

The reason for the narrow rear uprights is that running 2 deg or more of rear toe in with the stock hexes and foam tires makes the car wider than the max legal width of 190 mm. And narrow hexes break too easily.


Maybe I'm missing something, but WHY does Corally insist on using these silly clamping hexes???!!!??? WHY NOT JUST MAKE SOLID HEXES LIKE AE, LOSI, HPI, ETC???? There is NO NEED for overly complex, under-engineered clamping hexes. Does Tamiya sell a solid hex that's the right depth that will work on the RDX? I can't believe that someone hasn't found a better hex from another company that works better.
Stealth_RT is offline  
Old 02-07-2006, 03:44 PM
  #5672  
Tech Master
 
Merciless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,027
Default

Hi all , I'm new to the RDX having used X-ray and Hpi in the past. I'm now getting her set-up and finding something with the suspension strange ....

With the std. 17lb springs front and rear , 50wt oil in the front and 40wt in the rear. Front shocks mounted 1 hole in at the top and all the way out on the suspension arms. At the rear 2 holes in at the top and out on the corally extensions on the arms.

The rear of my car feels much stiffer than the front when proforming the "push the shock tower" test. This is with the car fully loaded and ready to race.ride heights set and tweak all correct.

This dosen't seem right as usually i'd expect the front to be slightly stiffer than the back

I've tried changing the springing but even with 14.5 on the rear and 19 up front i'd still say the balance is still towards the rear being harder ...... is something wrong or is this the way i need to have the car set ??

Please help guys i really want this to go right "out the box" cheers
Merciless is offline  
Old 02-07-2006, 04:01 PM
  #5673  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Steve_L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 60
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Yeah it does seem strange at first but if you are running off the shock extensions on the rear then the rear will seem harder due to the shock being further out on the arm, don't worry about it. All the UK team run the car like this.
Steve_L is offline  
Old 02-07-2006, 04:12 PM
  #5674  
Tech Master
 
Merciless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,027
Default

Sorry i didn't mean it's strange that it feels like this as like you say with the extensions you'd expect it ......... it just dosen't seem right to have the rear set-up harder than the front and by a fair amount too

i've now got to 22lb's on the front and 14.5lb on the rear and i'm getting a more even "feel"

But with a Chris Kerswell set-up sheet from the DMS infront of me saying 17lb front and rear i'm thinking something must be wrong as if i put 17's front and rear the front is like half as stiff as the rear

I'm looking to get it set-up for sorex 24r's indoors on medium grip carpet.
Merciless is offline  
Old 02-07-2006, 04:27 PM
  #5675  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (13)
 
Korey Harbke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 6,176
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Honestly guys.... I never really pay attention to static feel. I always just do changes as needed on the track. If it's weird, but it's dialed..... I dont worry about it. Just wheel it!!!! But that stiffer feeling in the rear is caused by the extensions. Some of the team guys are even using longer extensions and it makes the rear feel rock hard if you use the same springs.

-Korey
Korey Harbke is offline  
Old 02-07-2006, 04:32 PM
  #5676  
Tech Master
iTrader: (19)
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 1,885
Trader Rating: 19 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Merciless
Hi all , I'm new to the RDX having used X-ray and Hpi in the past. I'm now getting her set-up and finding something with the suspension strange ....

With the std. 17lb springs front and rear , 50wt oil in the front and 40wt in the rear. Front shocks mounted 1 hole in at the top and all the way out on the suspension arms. At the rear 2 holes in at the top and out on the corally extensions on the arms.

The rear of my car feels much stiffer than the front when proforming the "push the shock tower" test. This is with the car fully loaded and ready to race.ride heights set and tweak all correct.

This dosen't seem right as usually i'd expect the front to be slightly stiffer than the back

I've tried changing the springing but even with 14.5 on the rear and 19 up front i'd still say the balance is still towards the rear being harder ...... is something wrong or is this the way i need to have the car set ??

Please help guys i really want this to go right "out the box" cheers
The extentions take away the mechanical leverage on the shock. My car feels the same way....different spring "rates" because I am currently running on carpet but the rear "feels" stiffer than the front. It is nothing to worry about.....
Advil is offline  
Old 02-07-2006, 04:33 PM
  #5677  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Steve_L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 60
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Yep, both Chris and I run 17lb all round at DMS. I have tried the car without the rear shock extensions to even it up but it seems to cause the rear to snatch mid corner. I have never run the Sorex tires indoors but would assume that they are not too dissmilar to the Lrp's?!? I can only sugest to try Chris's setup and go from there as the DMS setup is pretty good.
Steve_L is offline  
Old 02-07-2006, 06:13 PM
  #5678  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (103)
 
stiltskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 5,393
Trader Rating: 103 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Merciless
The rear of my car feels much stiffer than the front when proforming the "push the shock tower" test. Please help guys i really want this to go right "out the box" cheers
I've been running mine for about a year now. This was one of the first things that I noticed also. But I couldn't argue with the way the car felt on the track. It was very smooth and seemed to flow well. The car also felt "slow" to me but the lap times showed different. Like they said, don't worry about the static feel, worry about how it feels on the track.
stiltskin is offline  
Old 02-07-2006, 06:35 PM
  #5679  
Tech Master
iTrader: (4)
 
subman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Edmonton,Canada
Posts: 1,237
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Anyone breaking camber links I broke a couple now and was wondering if I should order lots or is it just a fluke?
subman is offline  
Old 02-07-2006, 06:44 PM
  #5680  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Drummondville, Quebec
Posts: 150
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

subman, you just have to put your camber link in titanium...you can order the lenght you want from lunsford.

Pace
Pace72 is offline  
Old 02-07-2006, 06:49 PM
  #5681  
Tech Master
 
koabich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 1,359
Default

Originally Posted by stiltskin
I've been running mine for about a year now. This was one of the first things that I noticed also. But I couldn't argue with the way the car felt on the track. It was very smooth and seemed to flow well. The car also felt "slow" to me but the lap times showed different. Like they said, don't worry about the static feel, worry about how it feels on the track.
I would have to say that has been the case wiuth every single car I've owned. The rear has always felt heavier even when it has been much lighter.
Probably a geometry thing!
koabich is offline  
Old 02-07-2006, 07:15 PM
  #5682  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (35)
 
ralph m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 981
Trader Rating: 35 (100%+)
Default

Hi Guys, New to the RDX and have a question with the build:

When I tighten the set screws in the c-hubs and rear uprights it eliminates any slop but it binds the suspension as the hinge pins are tight in the arms. I'd like to eliminate the e-clips on the outer hinge pins..do you guys use a reamer on the arms to allow the outer pins to move freely?

Thanks
ralph m is offline  
Old 02-07-2006, 07:21 PM
  #5683  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Posts: 910
Trader Rating: 19 (100%+)
Default

For the hinge pins, I usually use 1500 grit sandpaper and then 2000 grit sand paper to make them smooth and just a tad smaller. I also used a drill bit (one that barely slid in the arm hole, can't remember the size) and ran it through the arms in and out.
429racer is offline  
Old 02-07-2006, 07:29 PM
  #5684  
Tech Master
 
koabich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 1,359
Default

Originally Posted by ralph m
Hi Guys, New to the RDX and have a question with the build:

When I tighten the set screws in the c-hubs and rear uprights it eliminates any slop but it binds the suspension as the hinge pins are tight in the arms. I'd like to eliminate the e-clips on the outer hinge pins..do you guys use a reamer on the arms to allow the outer pins to move freely?

Thanks
I didn't seem to have that problem with mine...there were perfect. But yeah, you would want to use a drill bit to enlarge them slightly. Remember to do a little bit at a time as you do not want to make the holes too large!
koabich is offline  
Old 02-07-2006, 07:36 PM
  #5685  
Tech Master
 
koabich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 1,359
Default

Originally Posted by Stealth_RT
The reason for the narrow rear uprights is that running 2 deg or more of rear toe in with the stock hexes and foam tires makes the car wider than the max legal width of 190 mm. And narrow hexes break too easily.


Maybe I'm missing something, but WHY does Corally insist on using these silly clamping hexes???!!!??? WHY NOT JUST MAKE SOLID HEXES LIKE AE, LOSI, HPI, ETC???? There is NO NEED for overly complex, under-engineered clamping hexes. Does Tamiya sell a solid hex that's the right depth that will work on the RDX? I can't believe that someone hasn't found a better hex from another company that works better.
Ummm...my TC3 and TC4's all used clamping hexes. My 415's all had clamping hexes. My Schumachers also had clamping hexes. I don't think they are silly and I think you would have a hard time finding others that feel the same as you do.

Solid hexes are a pain in the but and can be difficult to take off and put on. Keep in mind that the Corally Hexes only have to be very lightly snugged. Do not do as the name suggests and "clamp" them down as they will break.
koabich is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.