R/C Tech Forums

Go Back   R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-29-2010, 06:31 PM   #16
Tech Elite
 
EddieO's Avatar
R/C Tech Charter Subscriber
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,414
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Bob Novak......at dinner after a race.....Peter Robinson was sitting right next to me...

The statement was in talks about Oscar Jansen arguing brushless controllers could be used as a traction control device.....as it evolved, the statement was made....nothing one could do to a controller could make the motor faster....

I am sure if you search for the carpet nats thread when brushless was made legal two weeks before the event, you will find similar statements, assuming they were not edited, like many were during that fiasco.....

People have been cheating in RC since it started......batteries, tires, bodies, motors, you name it.....someone, some where probably has cheated with it. Just give it time, all its gonna take is one tech geek to start racing and go, wow, I can hack an iphone....I can hack this too. Besides, you guys have already given them the tools with programs like Novalink, Hotwire, etc.....they already have an interface to work with...just need to figure out how to tell that software to make a light blink with boost....

Keep telling yourself its not possible.......millions of dollars are spent to encrypt video games, CAD programs, iphones, etc........they have ALL been cracked....most of the time its not even so they can use it either, just bragging rights.....

Later EddieO
__________________
www.teambrood.com
EddieO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 06:33 PM   #17
Tech Fanatic
 
jammincrtjames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 969
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tallyrc View Post
oh, it's this thread again
+1

Boosted all the way.
__________________
NEXUS RACING www.nexusracing.com | FANTOM RACING www.fantomracing.com
ORCA www.orcarc.com | TURTLE TRAX / www.turtletraxraceway.com
--------------------------------------------------
"If you're not first...you're last!"
jammincrtjames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 06:41 PM   #18
Tech Master
 
smyka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Broad Brook,CT
Posts: 1,182
Send a message via AIM to smyka
Default

man you can tell EddieO is back already causing problems hahahaa good to see your back into racing again hope everything worked it self out \\
__________________
Trinity, Proline ,EA motorsports, T.O.P Racing ,Futaba ,Bsr Racing tires ,Advantage racing products,Hot Bodies racing,Tq Wire ,REDS Racing, Orca ,Protoform racing
smyka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 06:45 PM   #19
Company Representative
R/C Tech Elite Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,891
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieO View Post
Bob Novak......at dinner after a race.....Peter Robinson was sitting right next to me...

The statement was in talks about Oscar Jansen arguing brushless controllers could be used as a traction control device.....as it evolved, the statement was made....nothing one could do to a controller could make the motor faster....

I am sure if you search for the carpet nats thread when brushless was made legal two weeks before the event, you will find similar statements, assuming they were not edited, like many were during that fiasco.....

People have been cheating in RC since it started......batteries, tires, bodies, motors, you name it.....someone, some where probably has cheated with it. Just give it time, all its gonna take is one tech geek to start racing and go, wow, I can hack an iphone....I can hack this too. Besides, you guys have already given them the tools with programs like Novalink, Hotwire, etc.....they already have an interface to work with...just need to figure out how to tell that software to make a light blink with boost....

Keep telling yourself its not possible.......millions of dollars are spent to encrypt video games, CAD programs, iphones, etc........they have ALL been cracked....most of the time its not even so they can use it either, just bragging rights.....

Later EddieO
Maybe, but I have never heard of anyone hacking into a esc's firmware. The early brushless technology conspiracy theories were generally about someone (a racer) hacking into a BL esc and making it do something that would give the hacker an advantage over everyone else. Magical thinking, at its finest!

So far, no speed control has ever been modified (by an outsider) to do anything that the mfgs' microprocessor programmers didn't program it to do. Including hacking the updateable software.
NovakTwo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 06:47 PM   #20
Tech Elite
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,002
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

No-boost class is good for racers like me who cannot control the speed of boost.

As for tech, easy to spot, look at the gearing. If someone is blowing by everyone down the straight with a high FDR (e.g. 5 vs 4) then there must be some timing or boost involved. Then do further esc check with the program card or lights.

Though I disagree on a spec no-boost esc... unnecessary expense. Many already own a non-boost esc (e.g. GTB, LRP TC, etc).
__________________
www.rccartips.com
www.f1rccars.com
www.f1rcclub.com
http://www.youtube.com/user/rccartips/
http://www.facebook.com/RCCarTipsFan
rccartips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 06:53 PM   #21
Tech Master
 
timmig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Trabuco Canyon-- in the Pines!!
Posts: 1,769
Trader Rating: 25 (100%+)
Default

My understanding of Tekin's new 208 software is--the ESC will be blinking in neutral position when on --when there's NO boost are timing set in the ESC
Simple huh? Blinking--no timing, solid light--timing

T
timmig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 06:56 PM   #22
Company Representative
R/C Tech Elite Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,891
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rccartips View Post
No-boost class is good for racers like me who cannot control the speed of boost.

As for tech, easy to spot, look at the gearing. If someone is blowing by everyone down the straight with a high FDR (e.g. 5 vs 4) then there must be some timing or boost involved. Then do further esc check with the program card or lights.

Though I disagree on a spec no-boost esc... unnecessary expense. Many already own a non-boost esc (e.g. GTB, LRP TC, etc).
If there were a true, non-boost class, all manufacturers who wished to participate would offer a non-boost controller.

If you build it, they will come.
NovakTwo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 07:00 PM   #23
Tech Elite
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,002
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Hi NovakTwo,

Im fine with manufacturers offering no-boost escs. What I meant was that races should not be limited to a specific brand/model of non-boost esc. That way those of us with old escs can join without added expense.

Currently racing in the HPI Cup non-boost class. Top 3 drivers using GTB, Hobbywing (no-boost setting), and LRP TC. Fastest laptimes separated by only hundreds of a second despite variety in esc.

__________________
www.rccartips.com
www.f1rccars.com
www.f1rcclub.com
http://www.youtube.com/user/rccartips/
http://www.facebook.com/RCCarTipsFan
rccartips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 07:01 PM   #24
Tech Addict
 
mattleegee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Kent, WA
Posts: 646
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

that would be nice just to have all programmables go away
power profiles is enough... software wars will get out of hand...
__________________
AE ft b4.1 Ballistic 13.5 + SXX comp v2 (3-5-3-8) 1258tg
AE ft b4.1 Ballistic 17.5 + SXX comp v2 (3-7-0-4) 1257tg
BRCR
I pick things up and put them down
mattleegee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 07:04 PM   #25
Tech Elite
 
EddieO's Avatar
R/C Tech Charter Subscriber
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,414
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

I wouldn't be so confident nobody has hacked it

And the early theories was not a customer hacking it (though I and many others said it), but Team only software....and now with the Spec mode.....whats to stop a Company, besides ethics, from showing up at a race with subtle boosted software.....

Smyka, doing what I do best!

Later EddieO
__________________
www.teambrood.com
EddieO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 07:13 PM   #26
Regional Moderator
 
CarbonJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,661
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NovakTwo View Post
It is impossible to check the PC programmable/firmware upgradeable controllers for cheating.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NovakTwo View Post
Can you tell me how track owners/race directors can test for cheating with the PC programmable escs?
Quote:
Originally Posted by NovakTwo View Post
If someone (at Novak) said that a racer could not hack into the esc firmware (e.g. Super Sport esc, at the time) to make the motor go faster, that was correct. And, they still can't.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NovakTwo View Post
Maybe, but I have never heard of anyone hacking into a esc's firmware. The early brushless technology conspiracy theories were generally about someone (a racer) hacking into a BL esc and making it do something that would give the hacker an advantage over everyone else. Magical thinking, at its finest!

So far, no speed control has ever been modified (by an outsider) to do anything that the mfgs' microprocessor programmers didn't program it to do. Including hacking the updateable software.
Why would a track owner/race director need to check for cheating when you yourself have stated that no speed control has ever been modified by an outsider? Or are you implying that some manufacturers themselves are cheating?
__________________
*** The Gate - Celebrating 8 years at the same location ***
The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits. - Albert Einstein
Understeer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car and oversteer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car
CarbonJoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 07:31 PM   #27
Tech Champion
 
robk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
Posts: 7,587
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieO View Post
I wouldn't be so confident nobody has hacked it

Later EddieO
Names or GTFO
__________________
A mutually re-enforcing cascade of failure

"Failior [sic] crowns enterprise." Robert Goddard

I-Lap Scoring Systems http://www.rclapcounter.com/
robk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 07:33 PM   #28
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 102
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by timmig View Post
My understanding of Tekin's new 208 software is--the ESC will be blinking in neutral position when on --when there's NO boost are timing set in the ESC
Simple huh? Blinking--no timing, solid light--timing

T
LOL, have you been sleeping under a rock all week???!!!!!! Tekin 208!!! LOL, they are the ones that screwed it all up!!!!

Just b/c a light is blinking does not mean the speedo software is legal..... We are screwed until a race director has the ability to tech every speedo (beyond a blinking light)...... The next rule is going to be if you have a blinking blue light on the body that means your car makes weight!!!! How can our racing organizers expect us to spend $1,000's of $$ traveling to races when they cannot tech a car properly?????? If the race organizer has a specific rule they should have a way to inspect the car to meet a specific requirement...... Weight/scale, body/ruler, etc...... Hauling a laptop to the track is a pain, but I think we are screwed.............
Murray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 09:03 PM   #29
Tech Elite
 
tallyrc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: palm city, fl
Posts: 2,594
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

so are we going to spec the drive frequency too? how about initial drive of the "spec" esc? how about the ramp of the throttle curve? initial brake? manufacture tollerence of the placement of the hall sensors? once that is done are we gonna spec the FDR for every track, or is it gonna be up to the track owner to spec the FDR for what works best with "their" brand of esc/motor combo that might me more or less torquey than some out of towners? cause we all know some motors have different characteristics.. are we gonna limit the on resistance of the esc's so none are more efficient? here's an idea.. spec a slow wind of motor and have folks learn to make it go fast, timing or not.. is 17.5 too fast? maybe its time for 21.5.. we got 2 years out of our 17.5's already.. in the old days that was like 6-10 brushed motors....
__________________
WWW.STORMERHOBBIES.COM helping keep pan cars alive!

Turns out not where, but who your with that really matters... DMB
tallyrc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 09:14 PM   #30
Tech Master
 
timmig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Trabuco Canyon-- in the Pines!!
Posts: 1,769
Trader Rating: 25 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Murray View Post
LOL, have you been sleeping under a rock all week???!!!!!! Tekin 208!!! LOL, they are the ones that screwed it all up!!!!

Just b/c a light is blinking does not mean the speedo software is legal..... We are screwed until a race director has the ability to tech every speedo (beyond a blinking light)...... The next rule is going to be if you have a blinking blue light on the body that means your car makes weight!!!! How can our racing organizers expect us to spend $1,000's of $$ traveling to races when they cannot tech a car properly?????? If the race organizer has a specific rule they should have a way to inspect the car to meet a specific requirement...... Weight/scale, body/ruler, etc...... Hauling a laptop to the track is a pain, but I think we are screwed.............
wow--why would you EVER race?? There's cheaters and conspiracy under everything.
Guess you should give up and go flying!!
There's lot's of ESC's out there WITHOUT the capability of timing--- use them if you're so worried about someone cheating. Their a LOT cheaper to use also. If people want to be in the timing class--that's the ESC to use. And YES--we'll need more than one ESC to truly make the system work.
FWIW
T
timmig is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why is On-Road dead ? lightfoot California Racing 291 09-19-2010 09:19 AM
Ernest Provetti Open letter to RC Industry stonedgti Electric On-Road 330 03-24-2010 10:29 AM



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -7. It is currently 10:23 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.2.1
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Advertise Content © 2001-2011 RCTech.net