Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
3Racing Sakura Zero S >

3Racing Sakura Zero S

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree2Likes

3Racing Sakura Zero S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-2012, 06:16 PM
  #1441  
Tech Master
iTrader: (43)
 
bronc4now's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Hoffman Estates,IL
Posts: 1,484
Trader Rating: 43 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by squarehead
In case anyone is trying to get to the proper gearing on this car for a USVTA car using a 25.5 it's not an easy process on this car. I figure I would save everyone else from making the same mistakes I did to get it to work.

First, if you want to use a 21.5 or 25.5 motor, you are going to need the vertical motor mount (SAK-66/PK). Don't even bother with the stock setup. I haven't found any small enough spur gears that had holes for the horizontal motor mount.

The 3racing website and a few people here expressed that it is mandatory that you use SAK-38/WO Soft upper deck with this, which is true, however, the car comes with the soft upper deck, so you do NOT need to buy another upper deck. I don't know why I assumed the "soft" upper deck was aftermarket and not stock, but I was wrong, and I ordered that part with the vertical motor mount. You don't need to at all, as it is the same one you already have. Unfortunately, I found out the hard way.

Anyway, I am used to having small spurs and large pinions for VTA spec racing, and the small spurs would not come close to the pinions when the motor was in the closest position to the spur. Everything I had in my box was either too large or too small to work. I wound up in a trial by error experimentation with expensive spur gears to get the right mesh and alignment.

So the absolute smallest 64p sour you should even try is an 83t gear. With that and a 25.5t spec motor, I can get a 40t pinion on and meshed properly to get a 4.040 FDR on the car with a 37t pulley on the diffs and a 19t pulley on the spur (not stock). I could probably get a 39t to work, but it would be REALLY close. Anything larger should work fine.

I would recommend at least a 85t spur for proper mesh and alignment on a spec car using anything 21.5 or 25.5. The 37t/19t pulley setup helps a lot in getting the FDR in the right window.


Hope this helps someone else avoid the expense and time wasted that finally got me to the right solution.



doug
so i should get a 83t spur and a 40t pinion 64pitch for vta 25,5t.
I ordered the 19t center but not a 37 , next order..

just ordered 84t spur and 39-40-41t pinions 64pitch hope that works

Last edited by bronc4now; 04-07-2012 at 10:34 PM.
bronc4now is offline  
Old 04-08-2012, 04:45 AM
  #1442  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
mingnon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sutherland Shire
Posts: 962
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

am running sakura zero with a few hop ups, and a couple of relatively simple mods allows me to run 21.5 blinky, VTA down here in Aust

- 60 tooth (48 pitch) RW Sur gear - file off two of the lugs on the spur gear holder (plastic or aluminium)

- Filed the top of the vertical motor mount - can now fit a 43 tooth (48 pitch) pinion gear

- Using the 20 centre gear and a tamiya 37 pulley (solid front), and 37 on the rear have got the gearing to 1.85

Only problem is wearing out front hpi tyres in vta, going to go back to gear diff and then run lighter springs and oil.
mingnon is offline  
Old 04-08-2012, 05:18 AM
  #1443  
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Northeast GA
Posts: 1,685
Default

88 spur in 64 pitch will give you plenty of room for a 4.0 FDR. Use the 38 tooth and 19 tooth pulleys. I have run 3.7 to 4.2 on this set up.

I don't know who said the soft deck was needed for the vertical mount. it is the carbon upper deck that fits better although it is not completely necessary if you are willing to grind the stock deck.

Although I'm happy your mod filing the spur gear holder worked I would not recommend this. It will produce a weak point in holding the gear. With only two contact points you will increase the wear on the parts. Also it is unnecessary work with the right gears.
6376vette is offline  
Old 04-08-2012, 06:38 AM
  #1444  
Tech Master
iTrader: (12)
 
pejota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,022
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

I'm the oddball here with my gearing...

I picked up the optional 37 tooth front and rear diffs. Combine that with the stock 20 tooth center pulley and i run a 1.85 internal ratio. Belt tension is not an issue with the smaller front/rear diffs.

For a spur, i run 3racing's 92 tooth, 64 pitch gear. I am also running the stock motor mount. No issues with adjustments and i'm running a 47 tooth pinion for a 3.62 FDR. I'm still working on gearing/motor timing since i'm on a new track. Tightening motor screws is a pain with the stock mount, so i'm thinking of getting the vertical mount. From what i hear, the issue with that is flipping the belts and that causes issues with the battery mounting system. I think 3racing's battery system is the best i've ever seen, and i'm reluctant to get away from it.
pejota is offline  
Old 04-08-2012, 08:39 AM
  #1445  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (165)
 
SteveM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: CANADA
Posts: 7,778
Trader Rating: 165 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by pejota
For a spur, i run 3racing's 92 tooth, 64 pitch gear. I am also running the stock motor mount. No issues with adjustments and i'm running a 47 tooth pinion for a 3.62 FDR. I'm still working on gearing/motor timing since i'm on a new track. Tightening motor screws is a pain with the stock mount, so i'm thinking of getting the vertical mount. From what i hear, the issue with that is flipping the belts and that causes issues with the battery mounting system. I think 3racing's battery system is the best i've ever seen, and i'm reluctant to get away from it.
With the vertical motor mount you must flip the belts to the other side of the chassis. The upper deck must also be modified to clear the motor mount, but this is relatively simple to do and takes only a few minutes with a Dremel and a small sanding drum bit. The effort is worth it in my opinion as you gain much better access to the two motor bolts.
SteveM is offline  
Old 04-08-2012, 09:17 AM
  #1446  
Tech Master
iTrader: (12)
 
pejota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,022
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

What about belt interference with the battery mounts?

Any pics you can post?



Originally Posted by SteveM
With the vertical motor mount you must flip the belts to the other side of the chassis. The upper deck must also be modified to clear the motor mount, but this is relatively simple to do and takes only a few minutes with a Dremel and a small sanding drum bit. The effort is worth it in my opinion as you gain much better access to the two motor bolts.
pejota is offline  
Old 04-08-2012, 10:13 AM
  #1447  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (165)
 
SteveM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: CANADA
Posts: 7,778
Trader Rating: 165 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by pejota
What about belt interference with the battery mounts?

Any pics you can post?
The reversed belts also interfere with the plastic battery tray guides and they will also need to be modified.

Last edited by SteveM; 12-24-2015 at 07:58 AM.
SteveM is offline  
Old 04-08-2012, 03:11 PM
  #1448  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
mingnon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sutherland Shire
Posts: 962
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by 6376vette
88 spur in 64 pitch will give you plenty of room for a 4.0 FDR. Use the 38 tooth and 19 tooth pulleys. I have run 3.7 to 4.2 on this set up.

Although I'm happy your mod filing the spur gear holder worked I would not recommend this. It will produce a weak point in holding the gear. With only two contact points you will increase the wear on the parts. Also it is unnecessary work with the right gears.

Have been running this mod in 2 chassis for 3 months with no wear on any of the drive train (one a drift setup -9 turn motor, other a carpet runner 13 turn). Have also seen same setup in 1 other car, has been running for 2 months with no wear issues. Cars are stripped down bi weekly for maintenance.

Down here we need a fdr of 3 - 3.2 to be competitive in the local VTA.
mingnon is offline  
Old 04-08-2012, 06:55 PM
  #1449  
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Northeast GA
Posts: 1,685
Default

Glad it seems to be working thus far.
6376vette is offline  
Old 04-09-2012, 03:06 PM
  #1450  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (3)
 
redbarton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 230
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

I am liking my Zero S so much that I bought a second used chassis to replace my TC4 for Vintage. Unfortunately, our outdoor on-road season now seems to be in jeopardy about whether or not it will happen at all. Grrr! I just put a bunch of upgrades on the original, too!
redbarton is offline  
Old 04-11-2012, 06:24 PM
  #1451  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
ChrisNRG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 71
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

A box stock Zero S would require the 44mm Universals to replace the rear swing shafts, correct?
ChrisNRG is offline  
Old 04-11-2012, 08:15 PM
  #1452  
Tech Master
 
malcnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CHRISTCHURCH, NewZealand
Posts: 1,339
Default

Originally Posted by ChrisNRG
A box stock Zero S would require the 44mm Universals to replace the rear swing shafts, correct?
yes correct.
malcnz is offline  
Old 04-12-2012, 07:16 PM
  #1453  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
rsawyers9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 361
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

I snapped a front arm this evening. Glanced off a pipe on the straight and broke the RF arm through the outer hinge pin holes. After looking at the remaining bit of the arm it looks like there was a significant amount of air bubbles in the plastic along the break. Was this just a bad molding or are the arms really this fragile. I was running a 25.5t and the hit was not at all hard.

Also, which arms should I order. The Hard sak-25h or the sak-x02?
rsawyers9 is offline  
Old 04-12-2012, 07:35 PM
  #1454  
Tech Master
 
Madulla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,095
Default

Get the hard ones. Do you have the X-ray hard bumper?
Madulla is offline  
Old 04-12-2012, 07:41 PM
  #1455  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
rsawyers9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 361
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Madulla
Get the hard ones. Do you have the X-ray hard bumper?
Thanks. No i have the stock bumper but I actually didn't even hit the bumper in this impact.
rsawyers9 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.