Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
BRING BACK THE BRUSHES!!! >

BRING BACK THE BRUSHES!!!

BRING BACK THE BRUSHES!!!

Old 09-16-2010, 11:45 AM
  #121  
Tech Master
iTrader: (8)
 
PitNamedGordie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Highwood, IL
Posts: 1,789
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by or8ital View Post
I'm not quoting this as a response but as an example.

I think that is some of the issue with this activity. There are so few that do it we have mixed those that do this as a hobby with those that do this as a sport. Take an activity such as playing tennis. Would you say Avg Joe plays tennis because they have dreams of becoming a professional tennis player? No. They do it because it is a fun activity. I guess where the analogy falls apart is that tennis has a bracket system so people of like abilities through the spectrum compete against each other.

I'm on my way out of the hobby to take a long break. It became overwhelming and no longer fun. I felt like I had to be competitive with people that took it much more serious than I did. I felt it necessary, right or wrong, to always keep up with equipment, etc. The whole sportsman thing became the final straw. I knew that I would get grief for racing in a sportsman class but was still off the pace of the top guys in stock. I didn't feel like there was a class left that I would enjoy.
Wow I completely know where you are coming from. I can't run with the fast guys at my track, a la Brad Johnson. I know my skill level and know the amount of time it would take for me to get a lot better. I don't have that time, but I fight myself because I know I could be a lot better. However, I have become somewhat comfortable with how good I am or am not. But my competitive nature sometimes gets the best of me...and I tend to press. I get grief (good natured of course) for not spending more time racing. Our big racing series has it's first race in a couple of weeks and I "need" to get ready for it...but I'm on the verge of being burnt...and need to step back for a bit. But you just have to realize where RC racing fits in your day to day life. For me, it's recreation...at least I try to keep it that way (as I'm thinking how much track time I need before the race ).
PitNamedGordie is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 12:20 PM
  #122  
Tech Master
iTrader: (10)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lynnwood, Washington
Posts: 1,018
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Wouldn't you need access to the ESC manufacturers tools and software to hack the firmware? Firmware and software are different. You can't hack firmware as easily as you can software.
malkiy is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 12:35 PM
  #123  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (38)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 5,360
Trader Rating: 38 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by malkiy View Post
Wouldn't you need access to the ESC manufacturers tools and software to hack the firmware? Firmware and software are different. You can't hack firmware as easily as you can software.
Really? Google "iPhone jailbreak".

Plus firmware IS software. There is just a loose difference between them. Firmware is usually software sitting directly on the hardware used to control it.

That said, I doubt people are hacking ESCs and if they are they likely aren't doing anything to make it better.
or8ital is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 12:42 PM
  #124  
Tech Master
iTrader: (10)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lynnwood, Washington
Posts: 1,018
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Still doesn't make it as easy to hack as software.


Originally Posted by or8ital View Post
Really? Google "iPhone jailbreak".

Plus firmware IS software. There is just a loose difference between them. Firmware is usually software sitting directly on the hardware used to control it.
malkiy is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 12:46 PM
  #125  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (38)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 5,360
Trader Rating: 38 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by malkiy View Post
Still doesn't make it as easy to hack as software.
Firmware is software and I might argue it would be easier because "firmware" is usually an API to software that contains the true logic. Firmware is usually just access to commands of the hardware. Then another layer of software tells it the commands to run and logic to use.

The other definition of difference would be the storage RAM vs ROM but that definition is also blurred. Again see iPhone its all ROM.
or8ital is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 01:13 PM
  #126  
Tech Master
iTrader: (5)
 
Chaz955i's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 1,104
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by or8ital View Post
I'm not quoting this as a response but as an example.

I think that is some of the issue with this activity. There are so few that do it we have mixed those that do this as a hobby with those that do this as a sport. Take an activity such as playing tennis. Would you say Avg Joe plays tennis because they have dreams of becoming a professional tennis player? No. They do it because it is a fun activity. I guess where the analogy falls apart is that tennis has a bracket system so people of like abilities through the spectrum compete against each other.

I'm on my way out of the hobby to take a long break. It became overwhelming and no longer fun. I felt like I had to be competitive with people that took it much more serious than I did. I felt it necessary, right or wrong, to always keep up with equipment, etc. The whole sportsman thing became the final straw. I knew that I would get grief for racing in a sportsman class but was still off the pace of the top guys in stock. I didn't feel like there was a class left that I would enjoy.
Nice analysis of the situation. I couldn't agree more.

Don't let anyone else ruin the hobby for you. Just race Sportsman and have fun with it. We should all be thankful that anyone shows up to race against, not worrying about what classes other people are running.
Chaz955i is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 01:13 PM
  #127  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (32)
 
syndr0me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 5280 Raceway
Posts: 13,267
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

The ESC manufacturers could release a "tech" program that reads the firmware back out of the ESC and verifies that its checksum matches known, "legal" firmware. If the companies aren't able to provide that, you remove their ESC's off the list of allowed controllers until they can. It's easy.

There's a bunch of butt-hurt naysayers in this thread.
syndr0me is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 01:28 PM
  #128  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (22)
 
robk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
Posts: 8,008
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by syndr0me View Post
The ESC manufacturers could release a "tech" program that reads the firmware back out of the ESC and verifies that its checksum matches known, "legal" firmware. If the companies aren't able to provide that, you remove their ESC's off the list of allowed controllers until they can. It's easy.

There's a bunch of butt-hurt naysayers in this thread.
+1 for logic
robk is online now  
Old 09-16-2010, 02:25 PM
  #129  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 92
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

+2, best idea I've read in this thread.

Heck, +3 for not making incorrect statements about firmware...

Originally Posted by robk View Post
+1 for logic
BNiels707 is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 02:36 PM
  #130  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (32)
 
syndr0me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 5280 Raceway
Posts: 13,267
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

Since this blinky LED thing was my idea, I suppose I should help find the solution to problems that don't exist as well.
syndr0me is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 02:40 PM
  #131  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 332
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by syndr0me View Post
The ESC manufacturers could release a "tech" program that reads the firmware back out of the ESC and verifies that its checksum matches known, "legal" firmware. If the companies aren't able to provide that, you remove their ESC's off the list of allowed controllers until they can. It's easy.

There's a bunch of butt-hurt naysayers in this thread.
Look at F1 when the banned traction control. You could physically see traction control being applied on the Audi cars but extensive searches of their ECU's and programing turned up nothing but it was there. I saw a program about it a few years back, of course they denied everything but it was painfully obvious. That is in a multi million dollar organization, not hobby races. The point being made is that anything electronic with software can be circumvented and hacked. Is it an issue right now, unknown but the potential is there and the ease of doing it is great making it even more likely. Of course this only matters in spec classes, as stated before, no issues in MOD. Of course none of this matters to me until I stop getting marshaled.
Chip73 is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 03:07 PM
  #132  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (32)
 
syndr0me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 5280 Raceway
Posts: 13,267
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Chip73 View Post
Look at F1 when the banned traction control. You could physically see traction control being applied on the Audi cars but extensive searches of their ECU's and programing turned up nothing but it was there. I saw a program about it a few years back, of course they denied everything but it was painfully obvious. That is in a multi million dollar organization, not hobby races. The point being made is that anything electronic with software can be circumvented and hacked. Is it an issue right now, unknown but the potential is there and the ease of doing it is great making it even more likely. Of course this only matters in spec classes, as stated before, no issues in MOD. Of course none of this matters to me until I stop getting marshaled.
There's a lot of far-fetched "what if" scenarios that could circumvent any level of tech and allow people to cheat. I think the best we can hope for is to try and tech away anything racers can do on their own. If the manufacturers want to facilitate cheating, which will always be possible, then you give them the death penalty and ban their products from sanctioned racing.

Probably the best option is to keep the "spec" classes slow, like non-sponsored slow so there's not much incentive to cheat. Then make super stock open esc (with spec motor) and mod open for both. Yes, 3 classes.
syndr0me is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 03:11 PM
  #133  
Tech Champion
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,242
Default

Can't we just specify a slower motor, 21.5, 25.5. 40.5, whatever is needed to slow stock down appropriately? Then the boosted ESC is a non issue. About everybody already has it, the ESCs seem to be only getting closer, another year or less and I suspect they will all be quite close.

Either way, I think for most they are already much closer than brushed ever was, at least for most club racing.
Dave H is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 03:20 PM
  #134  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
housey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: ENGLAND
Posts: 232
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Isn't some common sense teching all we need. If some guy is faster down the straight or has more punch on the infield than anyone else in the class then the dude is cheating, its obvious, why would only he have this extra power? Get the tech guys to go with him and they can all then see the proper spec firmware uploaded onto his esc, job done.

Boosted vs non-boosted is so obvious. Stop bleeting about flashing lights and use your eyes.

The dude has more power, he is cheating, get it fixed, bish bash bosh, cheating stopped.

The whole point of spec is everyone has the same speed, if someone is faster with speedo's and motors being so similar its cheating, easy peasy.
housey is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 03:21 PM
  #135  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (6)
 
EddieO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,417
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

While I am sure the ESC companies could have a check some program with some type of special interface...last I looked at the approved speed control list, there was 20+ on there.....so thats 20+ units a track would need to interface with, every track or big race has to have a laptop setup ready to plug in every approved speed control to tech it, yeah good luck with that! Most tracks have a tough time getting the proper ride height tech stuff.....now we want them all to be running software tech? A blinking light was doable....

And the slower you make the class.....the more likely they will want to cheat in it.....people always wanna go faster Look no further than silver can....people have been cheating in that since the dawn of time....

Dave H has probably the best solution in going to a super slow motor, so that even boosted, its SLOW.....40.5!

Housey, so guilty before proven innocent. If the person was slick enough, and made the boost very subtle, it would just look like his car was better through certain parts of the track....it doesn't always have to be a straight away speed.

Call me a naysayer all ya want.....I told you this would happen. Brushless is fine, but a lot of you went to great reaches to make all these claims why it was the savior of RC racing.......should of stuck to pretty much the only true one, they are way less to take care of.....

All I know is, recession or not......we sure had bigger turn outs when everything was brushed

Later EddieO
EddieO is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.