GT8 Class--buggy-based on road electric!
#2026
It's actually on the 19th. As a Dad myself, this is quality time and where I would want to spend my Father's Day. Just my .02.
#2027
#2028
They have another one of the Porsche at that LHS (Graves RC, Orlando) with a pink, green, and white paint scheme. I can take pics if anyone is interested.
#2029
#2030
I just happened to see the 3 hanging on the wall: the one I bought, the other Porsche, and a Viper painted black with a snake scales and eyes paint scheme at the front. It looks pretty cool, just not really my style.
Surprised they have the selection of GT bodies they do. When I went to Kissimmee Raceway I was the only one with a GT, and everyone I talked to said they didn't really know anyone else who ran them.
Surprised they have the selection of GT bodies they do. When I went to Kissimmee Raceway I was the only one with a GT, and everyone I talked to said they didn't really know anyone else who ran them.
#2031
I had an idea today. What do you guys think about replacing the rear chassis brace with a shock absorber? Like if you used a very firm spring, small hole piston, and heavy oil (diff oil?). The idea being to allow more flex and make it tunable.
Do you think it would be too weak and allow the chassis to get bent? Or in my case with a CF chassis, broken? Would the added flex even be beneficial, or is it better to have a stiffer chassis?
Do you think it would be too weak and allow the chassis to get bent? Or in my case with a CF chassis, broken? Would the added flex even be beneficial, or is it better to have a stiffer chassis?
#2032
There is not a GT body in any hobby shop in Houston... and probably never was.
*
*
#2033
Tech Adept
I had an idea today. What do you guys think about replacing the rear chassis brace with a shock absorber? Like if you used a very firm spring, small hole piston, and heavy oil (diff oil?). The idea being to allow more flex and make it tunable.
Do you think it would be too weak and allow the chassis to get bent? Or in my case with a CF chassis, broken? Would the added flex even be beneficial, or is it better to have a stiffer chassis?
Do you think it would be too weak and allow the chassis to get bent? Or in my case with a CF chassis, broken? Would the added flex even be beneficial, or is it better to have a stiffer chassis?
#2034
Tech Master
iTrader: (12)
Need a little help please.
I'm new to 1/8, not RC. Looking to pick up a Ofna GTP 2 E for my son and I to play around with.
I would like to ask advice on electronics, ESC, Motor and servo. Not looking for race grade, but not cheap crap either. Any recommendations?
Thanks
I'm new to 1/8, not RC. Looking to pick up a Ofna GTP 2 E for my son and I to play around with.
I would like to ask advice on electronics, ESC, Motor and servo. Not looking for race grade, but not cheap crap either. Any recommendations?
Thanks
#2035
Of course, this is just my theory, how it behaves may very well be totally different. I have a few of the older style Ofna 13mm shocks laying around, might experiment with them a bit and see how they behave.
#2036
Tech Adept
The way I'm picturing it, the shock might not even need a spring? I mean, the chassis is already wanting to return to it's normal shape after flexing (to a point of course), it acts like a heavy spring. Using a real thick diff oil (10k wt? 50-10k?) in the shock should allow (relatively) slow and small flex movements like in high speed cornering, but prevent the chassis from flexing too far, too fast like in a crash. Basically taking the damping effect of a shock absorber and making it extreme.
Of course, this is just my theory, how it behaves may very well be totally different. I have a few of the older style Ofna 13mm shocks laying around, might experiment with them a bit and see how they behave.
Of course, this is just my theory, how it behaves may very well be totally different. I have a few of the older style Ofna 13mm shocks laying around, might experiment with them a bit and see how they behave.
I think using the traxxas mod in the shock might be even a good idea, at least you control the return or compression?
#2037
Since that part of the chassis isn't a pivot point, Like say a pan car. IMHO the effect of the shock would be negligible. The chassis will flex there, but how much would it have to flex in order for the rebound of the shock (w/o a spring) to do anything? To try it, I believe the weight would be like 500k diff oil or something similar. There's f/r flex as well as side to side (twist).
I think an easier test is to remove the rear brace and drive it. Note the handling characteristics and see if it's better or worse.
I've never tried it, but it'd be interesting to hear your results. Good luck!
I think an easier test is to remove the rear brace and drive it. Note the handling characteristics and see if it's better or worse.
I've never tried it, but it'd be interesting to hear your results. Good luck!
#2038
Tech Adept
Since that part of the chassis isn't a pivot point, Like say a pan car. IMHO the effect of the shock would be negligible. The chassis will flex there, but how much would it have to flex in order for the rebound of the shock (w/o a spring) to do anything? To try it, I believe the weight would be like 500k diff oil or something similar. There's f/r flex as well as side to side (twist).
I think an easier test is to remove the rear brace and drive it. Note the handling characteristics and see if it's better or worse.
I've never tried it, but it'd be interesting to hear your results. Good luck!
I think an easier test is to remove the rear brace and drive it. Note the handling characteristics and see if it's better or worse.
I've never tried it, but it'd be interesting to hear your results. Good luck!
#2039
Cheap price would be the hobby wing. Alot of guys are using the castle system or the Tekin.
#2040
Here is my converted OFNA DM-1 Spec with parts listed if it helps.
http://www.rccoh.com/rc.how-to/dm-1....onversion.html
*