new F1 !!!

Reply

Old 06-23-2010, 01:48 PM
  #1  
Tech Adept
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: italy
Posts: 109
Default new F1 !!!

After having launched their 1/8 2WD "classic" car in both gas powered and electric powere versions, at WRC are preparing a new 1/10 electric powered F1....

Here are some photos of a prototype (still sharing some Tamiya parts)...

http://www.rc-elettrico.it/Forum/vie...php?f=57&t=393

more news in the future at:

http://www.wrc-racing.com/
il-gufo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 02:00 PM
  #2  
Tech Master
 
FREAKAH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,389
Default

Looks great! Like the front wing idea. Also looks like it's going to be expensive.

Keep us updated.
FREAKAH is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 03:51 PM
  #3  
Tech Adept
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: italy
Posts: 109
Default

Originally Posted by FREAKAH View Post
Looks great! Like the front wing idea. Also looks like it's going to be expensive.

Keep us updated.
rolling chassis will be sold for about 250 euros in Italy...

It is likely that WRC will be looking for distributors/dealers outside Itlay...
il-gufo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 08:40 AM
  #4  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
bakaguyjean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Atsugi Japan
Posts: 823
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

You can tell that a Nitro guy designed this. Too much alloy.All of that alloy need to go away and be replace by FRP or carbon. With the alloy, the first hit and the whole chassis will permently tweak beyound use. Even then using pivoting upper arms with a flat material for the lower arms will allow the arms to flex more than the springs. For very low grip circuits this might be ok, but average circuits will require you to run very hard springs to make up for the flexable lower and upper arms of this design.It looks like they tried to help out the arm flex with the front wing,but I dont see it helping much. The front wing in the picture is 3D printed,but if it made from plastic it looks to thin to help the arms and if it made from re-inforced carbon plastic it looks like it just would break. Tech Racing had a chassis like this but they didnt use the pivot ball upper arms and they also but a large block of plastic between the upper and lower arms towards the knuckles. With the Tech Racing Chassis it works but both the FRP and Carbon arms wear from the flexing. Flat piece of composite are not made to flex as much as suspension arms do. The plates wear out and you end up with flexable arms that are not the same on both sides. So you either have to balance the with different springs or just replace the arms. Tamiya F103 arms are around $6,the Tech Racing arms are around $15 just for the top of bottom.



The more I look at this the more it looks like a very bad Idea. Looks as though the steering servo is mounted flat, but upside down? That could have huge issues with bodies,requireing a low profile servo only.

The lowest chassis plate needs a bumper,oh wait the servo saver is there to protect the chassis?

From what I can see in the two picture the rear looks good. Im guessing they are planing on useing the Tamiya F104 ESC and reciever mounts.

Hopefully they think this through a bit more as its nice to have more F1 chassis around but not poorly thought out cars. Its just bad for F1.
bakaguyjean is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 10:30 AM
  #5  
Tech Adept
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: italy
Posts: 109
Default

Originally Posted by bakaguyjean View Post
You can tell that a Nitro guy designed this. Too much alloy.All of that alloy need to go away and be replace by FRP or carbon. With the alloy, the first hit and the whole chassis will permently tweak beyound use. Even then using pivoting upper arms with a flat material for the lower arms will allow the arms to flex more than the springs. For very low grip circuits this might be ok, but average circuits will require you to run very hard springs to make up for the flexable lower and upper arms of this design.It looks like they tried to help out the arm flex with the front wing,but I dont see it helping much. The front wing in the picture is 3D printed,but if it made from plastic it looks to thin to help the arms and if it made from re-inforced carbon plastic it looks like it just would break. Tech Racing had a chassis like this but they didnt use the pivot ball upper arms and they also but a large block of plastic between the upper and lower arms towards the knuckles. With the Tech Racing Chassis it works but both the FRP and Carbon arms wear from the flexing. Flat piece of composite are not made to flex as much as suspension arms do. The plates wear out and you end up with flexable arms that are not the same on both sides. So you either have to balance the with different springs or just replace the arms. Tamiya F103 arms are around $6,the Tech Racing arms are around $15 just for the top of bottom.



The more I look at this the more it looks like a very bad Idea. Looks as though the steering servo is mounted flat, but upside down? That could have huge issues with bodies,requireing a low profile servo only.

The lowest chassis plate needs a bumper,oh wait the servo saver is there to protect the chassis?

From what I can see in the two picture the rear looks good. Im guessing they are planing on useing the Tamiya F104 ESC and reciever mounts.

Hopefully they think this through a bit more as its nice to have more F1 chassis around but not poorly thought out cars. Its just bad for F1.
it's just a protopype.... carbon fiber will pop up shortly, I suppose...
abiut the servo... yes it must be a "low profile" one!
The guy who designed the car wants a car with a real "high nose" front like real F1s...
il-gufo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 10:40 AM
  #6  
Tech Champion
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Hawaii, USA
Posts: 7,192
Default

Additionally I would suggest you use the same wing and body mounting as Tamiya so that replacement bodies and wings are easy to find.
InspGadgt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 03:16 PM
  #7  
Tech Adept
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: italy
Posts: 109
Default

Originally Posted by InspGadgt View Post
Additionally I would suggest you use the same wing and body mounting as Tamiya so that replacement bodies and wings are easy to find.
I think it will be done only for the rear wing...
il-gufo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 07:37 PM
  #8  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
MaxSp97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Camarino
Posts: 458
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by il-gufo View Post
it's just a protopype.... carbon fiber will pop up shortly, I suppose...
abiut the servo... yes it must be a "low profile" one!
The guy who designed the car wants a car with a real "high nose" front like real F1s...
Here are the pictures of the HPI EXOTEK F10. This car is look like real F1 than others.
Awesome job you did Mike.
Attached Thumbnails new F1 !!!-exotek_f10front.jpg   new F1 !!!-exotek_f10underchassis.jpg   new F1 !!!-exotek_f10.jpg  
MaxSp97 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2010, 01:07 PM
  #9  
Tech Adept
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: italy
Posts: 109
Default

more photos

http://www.rc-elettrico.it/Forum/vie...3&p=2820#p2820
page two

Production cars should be available by november.... Christmas gift?


.

.
il-gufo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2010, 03:42 PM
  #10  
Tech Master
iTrader: (33)
 
M03Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Great Lakes
Posts: 1,187
Trader Rating: 33 (100%+)
Default

Not impressed we have better stuff here in the U.S.
M03Racer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2010, 04:11 PM
  #11  
Tech Adept
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: italy
Posts: 109
Default

Originally Posted by M03Racer View Post
Not impressed we have better stuff here in the U.S.
Time will tell....


.
il-gufo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2010, 04:21 PM
  #12  
Tech Fanatic
 
vabroom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: dark side of the moon
Posts: 935
Default

Originally Posted by M03Racer View Post
Not impressed we have better stuff here in the U.S.
Who or What?

Last edited by vabroom; 08-04-2010 at 06:22 PM.
vabroom is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2010, 04:27 PM
  #13  
avs
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
 
avs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,175
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by M03Racer View Post
Not impressed we have better stuff here in the U.S.
i am impressed, i am particularly interested in the 1/8 treads. that is a very interesting idea for a 1/8 2wd rubber tire class

i am unaware of anything like this whatsoever here in the US. M03Racer, maybe you could enlighten us all?
avs is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2010, 06:32 AM
  #14  
Tech Initiate
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 43
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

unless the rear pod pivots on a ball joint for up/down action (or something similar), the back end of the car is going to be super stiff on compression (not roll).
boro92 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2010, 09:26 AM
  #15  
Tech Adept
 
Sauber F1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 107
Default

Originally Posted by vabroom View Post
Who or What?
I am interested as well. I have seen some 3D drawings but nothing real so far.
Sauber F1 is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Terms of Service