Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Kyosho's New Ride!!!!!!!!!!!!! >

Kyosho's New Ride!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Kyosho's New Ride!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Old 05-13-2004, 12:53 PM
  #16  
Tech Master
 
forty6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,922
Default

Well, how many ways can you design a shaft car? Batteries on the left or on the right, shaft in the middle, blah blah.
forty6 is offline  
Old 05-13-2004, 01:19 PM
  #17  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (47)
 
Randy Caster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 16,716
Trader Rating: 47 (100%+)
Default

Originally posted by forty6
Well, how many ways can you design a shaft car? Batteries on the left or on the right, shaft in the middle, blah blah.
Exactly, all of the shaft cars look alike because they are proven to perform in that layout.

Is it just me, or does it look like there is very little room for electronics?
Randy Caster is offline  
Old 05-13-2004, 01:24 PM
  #18  
Tech Master
 
forty6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,922
Default

Originally posted by Randy Caster
Exactly, all of the shaft cars look alike because they are proven to perform in that layout.

Is it just me, or does it look like there is very little room for electronics?
Maybe that is why they didn't put a speedo and rx on the display model. No place to put it. Seriously though, it does look tight in there.
forty6 is offline  
Old 05-13-2004, 01:25 PM
  #19  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (8)
 
rc-zombies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: NorCal. Napa area
Posts: 7,222
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Originally posted by Randy Caster
Exactly, all of the shaft cars look alike because they are proven to perform in that layout.

Is it just me, or does it look like there is very little room for electronics?
You're right...compared to the Pro4...there's very little room for the electronics...
rc-zombies is offline  
Old 05-13-2004, 01:38 PM
  #20  
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
 
RandyB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Columbus OH.
Posts: 1,176
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

nice japanese look to it design wise with parts support!!!
RandyB is offline  
Old 05-13-2004, 02:51 PM
  #21  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
eeyan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: California
Posts: 3,945
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

I'd give it a try if the price doesn't go beyond the KX-1's when it first came out ($400 for a car isn't consumer friendly at all!)

Or maybe wait 2 yrs and see the price plummet down at Tower Hobbies from "only for the rich guys can afford" to "here take it... it's practically FREE!"
eeyan is offline  
Old 05-13-2004, 02:59 PM
  #22  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ridin my Harley
Posts: 707
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

I do like the really thick carbon chassis. I would love to see one in person.
Adam Hartzell is offline  
Old 05-13-2004, 03:40 PM
  #23  
Tech Regular
 
RcMonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Philly burbs
Posts: 389
Red face

B,

I agree with there. Also, I wished they designed new streering knuckles instead of re-using the goofy ones with those alum extenders (see shs04070.jpg) from the previous KX-One. That was one of my gripes when I had the KX-One.

Originally posted by B
heh, kyosho's policy of "reuse and recycle" is back again.

That gearbox looks awfully similar to that on the FW05R
RcMonk is offline  
Old 05-13-2004, 04:10 PM
  #24  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (17)
 
Jon Kerr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 9,659
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default

Originally posted by Cole Trickle
Excuse me, but I find it boring. Yet another typically shaft car. And it aint adjustable in the camber links compartment at all.
Actually, if you look close at the camber link, it looks like there may be a second hole on the bulkhead and they're vertical mounting. That'll give you a ton of roll center adjustments. But I do agree, it's boring.
Jon Kerr is offline  
Old 05-13-2004, 04:14 PM
  #25  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (9)
 
seaball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,304
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Post

wow. i was probably more excited over this thread than any other "new chassis" thread to date. well, it's accurate to say that the excitement vanished quickly.

after seeing what they were toying with last year, i was optimistic that they would have been extremely innovative with this offering. i have had three kxone's, and not at the "rich guys only" price. they are so fun to look at. that was something to be proud of, if not from it's performance, but from it's originality.

cole - i have made the same observation about the conservativism that follows unsuccessful originality. too bad.

i wouldn't even think of using this car over the new evo4 to be released. currently i have a barracuda and i would only consider trading it in for another shaft car if it had aluminum bulkheads. just my thoughts. then again, i don't run outdoors. that's a big difference.

oh well, props to those who found the pics. rctech is on top of it!
seaball is offline  
Old 05-13-2004, 04:19 PM
  #26  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (9)
 
seaball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,304
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Thumbs down

yep, upon mild scrutiny, the most boring on-road car ever to be released.
seaball is offline  
Old 05-13-2004, 04:58 PM
  #27  
Tech Master
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
gijoe64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Corona, Ca
Posts: 1,458
Trader Rating: 30 (100%+)
Default

I can't beleve I am hearing this, a car has to look good to run good. I have seen a lot of good looking chassis and they handle like [email protected]###t may be the simplicty of this chassis will work? or not ? but you guys fall for anything make it shine and it's fine.
gijoe64 is offline  
Old 05-13-2004, 05:08 PM
  #28  
Tech Elite
 
jeffreylin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Traction Roll!
Posts: 2,564
Default

Folks, I think this was more of a experiment/prototype than anything else. The website that provided these pictures mentioned using parts from the FW-05 chassis and it being a "reference product." I think they just raid the parts bin and put something together to gage interest out there.
jeffreylin is offline  
Old 05-13-2004, 05:31 PM
  #29  
Tech Elite
 
AMGRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,939
Default

Yeah too much window shopping going on here. I posted a pre-production picture of the FW05R into the NTC3 forum and the hating began. Too ugly, etc, etc. But when the car became available the winning began. At least give it a chance guys. A pretty or innovative car is good for chassis lovers, a fast car is what sells units.
AMGRacer is offline  
Old 05-13-2004, 05:43 PM
  #30  
Tech Elite
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,828
Default

When BMI came out with tc3 Convo Kit people Flamed it saying it wouldn't work. Look now, BMI is one of the Top after Market Company with tons of great driver.
True R/C Racing is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.