Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Would anyone buy a revised XXX-S? >

Would anyone buy a revised XXX-S?

Would anyone buy a revised XXX-S?

Old 11-08-2009, 08:54 AM
  #46  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
Yeti35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SL, UT
Posts: 2,804
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by RCknight View Post
I'm thinking something closer to T3 with XXX-S prototype hinge pin blocks and Pro 4 arms. Those blocks would make it easier to shim.

John Stranahan made some great points about the XXX-S that I just read. I guess the question is can it be a good stock car? I think brushless has changed that some, but will people think they need the shaft drive free wheel. lol I wish we could see a revised tub car as well as a plate car, but that will never happen. I want something with sealed drive train and I don't understand why Losi took the XXX-S off the market. It's a great all around car that's not costing them anything. I wish they would continue the graphite parts. Losi doesn't have to mill the chassis.
Losi did not take anything off the market, it was Horizon that ended the XXXS's life. They are pretty much a toy company now and not that concerned with racing onroad really anymore.
Yeti35 is offline  
Old 11-08-2009, 09:46 AM
  #47  
Company Representative
iTrader: (6)
 
SweepRacingUSA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: www.SweepRacingUSA.com
Posts: 1,855
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Yeti35 View Post
Losi did not take anything off the market, it was Horizon that ended the XXXS's life. They are pretty much a toy company now and not that concerned with racing onroad really anymore.

I kinda disagree, XXX-S was reaching it's liife spent and also had problem on the carpet racing, the team wanted a car that can do good on both surface also they wanted to have a ground up on-road car not an offroad 4wd buggy with shorter arms.

IMO Losi created a JRXS Pro(front moto) and realised later the car don't have enough grip, the horizon allowed the team to spent another huge amount of mony to create a Type-R which came out on end of touring era.

I can imagine JRXS pro/type-R was huge lost in finance department at the horizon so they went to where all the people/money is, 1/8th offroad.

if you been watching the team closley you know they sold alot of eight kit and won so many races around, therefore of cos they have new parts for the car almost every month!

if the touring ever make come back in this hobby I know horizon will allow team to spend there effort for the touring cars again.

bottom line we need more surpport for this class!

thats my 2cents.
SweepRacingUSA is offline  
Old 11-08-2009, 07:08 PM
  #48  
Tech Addict
 
KDagh1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 520
Default

I had a XXXS (still do) and it ran perfectly. The handling was smooth, steering was great, and it was basically a dream to drive on carpet. I never raced it on asphalt. Nothing wrong with the chassis at all.
KDagh1 is offline  
Old 11-08-2009, 07:31 PM
  #49  
Tech Master
iTrader: (15)
 
Keith Billanti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: BUFFALO
Posts: 1,794
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

When i ran for losi- I often WISHED i could still run the XXXS. I thought many times about making my own XXXS like car, out of Type-R parts. Its all there. It can be done.

Dump the wide diffs, do a little math/drawing and anyone could make there own revised XXXS.

I would make it two belts. One belt was not a good setup.
Keith Billanti is offline  
Old 11-08-2009, 09:15 PM
  #50  
Tech Elite
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
RCknight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,294
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default Why not...

Originally Posted by Keith Billanti View Post
When i ran for losi- I often WISHED i could still run the XXXS. I thought many times about making my own XXXS like car, out of Type-R parts. Its all there. It can be done.

Dump the wide diffs, do a little math/drawing and anyone could make there own revised XXXS.

I would make it two belts. One belt was not a good setup.
Just wondered why not one belt? I always thought the XXX-S was so smooth under power for mod and even more so for large tracks. I would think a revised XXX-S plate car would make a great worlds race car. Large open flowing track. At this point I just wish Losi would keep making the G+. I mean what does it cost them? There's not good belted car with an enclosed drivetrain when the Drift is gone. lol
RCknight is offline  
Old 11-08-2009, 10:43 PM
  #51  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (22)
 
robk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
Posts: 8,155
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by da_John_wee View Post
I kinda disagree, XXX-S was reaching it's liife spent and also had problem on the carpet racing, the team wanted a car that can do good on both surface also they wanted to have a ground up on-road car not an offroad 4wd buggy with shorter arms.
The XXXS was designed specifically as a sedan. The offroad car was based on the sedan later.
robk is offline  
Old 11-09-2009, 06:58 AM
  #52  
Tech Master
iTrader: (15)
 
Keith Billanti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: BUFFALO
Posts: 1,794
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by RCknight View Post
Just wondered why not one belt? I always thought the XXX-S was so smooth under power for mod and even more so for large tracks. I would think a revised XXX-S plate car would make a great worlds race car. Large open flowing track. At this point I just wish Losi would keep making the G+. I mean what does it cost them? There's not good belted car with an enclosed drivetrain when the Drift is gone. lol

I just thought it was over thinking things. It got better when they made the larger idler= but i would still take a two belt setup over one.
Keith Billanti is offline  
Old 11-09-2009, 08:08 AM
  #53  
Tech Addict
 
imjonah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 704
Default

There are almost always some XXX-S and XXX-S G+ for sale on Ebay.

Here are two Auctions which completed
this weekend
I am not sure if anyone mentioned this; but one of the "problems" people mentioned with this car was its weight relative to the carbon fiber chassis,
with lipos lower weight and people having to add weights to carbon fiber cars to meet min weight spec, this disadvantage disappears.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...:B:WNA:US:1123

LOSI XXX-S GRAPHITE ROLLER XXXS SEDAN TOURING DRIFT
Item condition: Used
Ended: Nov 08, 200919:41:04 PST
Bid history: 11 bids
Winning bid: US $56.00

RTR with radio and all electronics
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...:B:WNA:US:1123
LOSI XXX-S GRAPHITE PLUS TOURING CAR XXXS SEDAN
Item condition: Used
Ended: Nov 08, 200919:28:50 PST
Bid history: 15 bids
Winning bid: US $86.00
imjonah is offline  
Old 11-09-2009, 10:50 AM
  #54  
Company Representative
iTrader: (6)
 
SweepRacingUSA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: www.SweepRacingUSA.com
Posts: 1,855
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

or should I say a touring that don't share any part with a offroad vehichle, you know what I mean. JRXS pro/type-R is the first 100% sedan created by the team, IMO

Originally Posted by robk View Post
The XXXS was designed specifically as a sedan. The offroad car was based on the sedan later.

IMO biggest problem I have on XXX-S is those drop screws on the bumper, once you go spring little harder you get endless chnage on the droops,

Originally Posted by imjonah View Post
There are almost always some XXX-S and XXX-S G+ for sale on Ebay.

Here are two Auctions which completed
this weekend
I am not sure if anyone mentioned this; but one of the "problems" people mentioned with this car was its weight relative to the carbon fiber chassis,
with lipos lower weight and people having to add weights to carbon fiber cars to meet min weight spec, this disadvantage disappears.
SweepRacingUSA is offline  
Old 11-09-2009, 11:14 AM
  #55  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
Yeti35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SL, UT
Posts: 2,804
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

My understanding was the XXXS and XXX4 chassis were different. One was longer then the other, but I don't remember which one. We had a guy who ran XXXS sedans and tried to convert one to offroad use, but it did not work out as well. It was ok, but not as good as the XXX4 chassis.
Yeti35 is offline  
Old 11-09-2009, 01:32 PM
  #56  
Company Representative
iTrader: (6)
 
SweepRacingUSA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: www.SweepRacingUSA.com
Posts: 1,855
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Yeti35 View Post
My understanding was the XXXS and XXX4 chassis were different. One was longer then the other, but I don't remember which one. We had a guy who ran XXXS sedans and tried to convert one to offroad use, but it did not work out as well. It was ok, but not as good as the XXX4 chassis.
xxx4 is longer
SweepRacingUSA is offline  
Old 11-09-2009, 09:56 PM
  #57  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (101)
 
Big Midget's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lawrence, Ks
Posts: 4,368
Trader Rating: 101 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by da_John_wee View Post
IMO biggest problem I have on XXX-S is those drop screws on the bumper, once you go spring little harder you get endless chnage on the droops,
True, but you can adjust droop without droop screws by limiting the travel of the shock shaft.
Big Midget is offline  
Old 11-09-2009, 10:22 PM
  #58  
Company Representative
iTrader: (6)
 
SweepRacingUSA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: www.SweepRacingUSA.com
Posts: 1,855
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Big Midget View Post
True, but you can adjust droop without droop screws by limiting the travel of the shock shaft.
thats what I been doing when I race this car but its not only PITA to adjust it also decreaed the oil volume of shocks, especialy front shocks start with such a low volume, after few spacers inside you only can have few drops in a shock, that's with Low roll center, I only ran the car on Low roll center for front, because If I have a high roll center I will need to put more spacers and that will really messed up the car.

hate that droopscrews but still LOVE this XXX-S after all.
SweepRacingUSA is offline  
Old 11-09-2009, 10:45 PM
  #59  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (101)
 
Big Midget's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lawrence, Ks
Posts: 4,368
Trader Rating: 101 (100%+)
Default

Thought I'd post this link: http://www.rctech.net/forum/electric...n-mod-etc.html

Tuns of great info in here, Do you guys know who john stranahan is?
Big Midget is offline  
Old 11-10-2009, 05:55 PM
  #60  
Tech Master
iTrader: (9)
 
Super Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,179
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by academygaz View Post
That wasn't the only twin deck carbon chassis with a single belt, there was also the -

Kawada Sigma:



Robitronic ETC V2:



Corally Assassin with direct drive option:



The best design i think is Kyosho KX-one! Battery in the center. twin vertical plate main for super stiff chassis.
Super Steve is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.