Xray T1
#8238
Tech Lord
iTrader: (13)
having your car underweight is a big advantage if you look at it the right way.you can add weight where it is needed and use it as a tuning option.if you make it heavy,you are stuck with what you are given.also,if your car is lighter at a club race or some non sanctioned event,you will be at a big advantage and at the same time have a car that is extremely rigid.my main concern with my chassis was to eliminate twist.the compression was a given being that it is a double deck chassis.now if you are lighter and more rigid,that leads to more speed going into a corner and more speed through and out of the corner.the car will change directions faster and square up much easier.
#8239
Originally posted by litespeed-dom
Hmm, ok this just created a dilemna for me..... which chassis for me? New XRAY or BMI?
Can someone maybe give some input on both the chassis?
Dom
Hmm, ok this just created a dilemna for me..... which chassis for me? New XRAY or BMI?
Can someone maybe give some input on both the chassis?
Dom
When you have the upper deck and bulkheads installed, the longitudinal stifness of the chassis has less effect than the torsional stiffness (twist) of the chassis, this is the area where the BMI wins over the Xray 3.5mm
#8240
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
Originally posted by protc3
i can offer a more than stiff enough chassis with minimal weight gain.a lighter car is a faster car
i can offer a more than stiff enough chassis with minimal weight gain.a lighter car is a faster car
So in terms of car weight there is no difference. However the thicker XRay chassis does put the weight as low as possible. Can't get lower than the chassis level itself. Low CG means faster car too.
#8241
Has anyone got the new front shock tower?
My question is, compared to the current FK tower (i got a 4 hole one not the 3 hole as in the instructions), do the shock and roll-centre holes line up? are the different hights/angles? Of course i reliaze the new outer camber link mounts, just woundering about the others?
My question is, compared to the current FK tower (i got a 4 hole one not the 3 hole as in the instructions), do the shock and roll-centre holes line up? are the different hights/angles? Of course i reliaze the new outer camber link mounts, just woundering about the others?
#8243
Tech Regular
protc3-
Raced with John Fontaine this weekend. He showed me a adjustable upper plate for the X-ray you had made. Can I get one and how much? I also race with WYD.
Thanks Allen
Raced with John Fontaine this weekend. He showed me a adjustable upper plate for the X-ray you had made. Can I get one and how much? I also race with WYD.
Thanks Allen
#8244
Originally posted by tonyv
So in terms of car weight there is no difference. However the thicker XRay chassis does put the weight as low as possible. Can't get lower than the chassis level itself. Low CG means faster car too.
So in terms of car weight there is no difference. However the thicker XRay chassis does put the weight as low as possible. Can't get lower than the chassis level itself. Low CG means faster car too.
I would think that adding weight where it is needed is alot better then just adding weight.
#8245
Dominic-What's up man this is Mike A from Florida....
just an F.Y.I the chassis that I used during the Nats was the BMI 350 chassis. Not really wanting to get into a discussion about torsional or longitudinal flex...my opinion is that the battery placement is by far the most crucial difference (benefit) to the BMI chassis. While at the nats, Alex and I tied for the fastest lap on the track in stock (16.4) while I was using the BMI and he was running the current Xray chassis.
The fact that the BMI chassis is lighter is in fact a tuning aid because as Jason said it allows you to place weight exactly where it is needed.
My recommendation is to go with the BMI chassis!
If you have any other questions you can post here or PM me...
Hope that helped a little...
Mike A
just an F.Y.I the chassis that I used during the Nats was the BMI 350 chassis. Not really wanting to get into a discussion about torsional or longitudinal flex...my opinion is that the battery placement is by far the most crucial difference (benefit) to the BMI chassis. While at the nats, Alex and I tied for the fastest lap on the track in stock (16.4) while I was using the BMI and he was running the current Xray chassis.
The fact that the BMI chassis is lighter is in fact a tuning aid because as Jason said it allows you to place weight exactly where it is needed.
My recommendation is to go with the BMI chassis!
If you have any other questions you can post here or PM me...
Hope that helped a little...
Mike A
#8247
Tech Elite
iTrader: (4)
Just ordered my XRAY chassis from BMI (Thanks to Team Butter!!!) in GOLD color, since black isn't available for another several days, why not try a different color! Jason was real cool to talk to and Keira's customer service was great! Can't wait to try out the new chassis this week.
Dom
Dom