XRAY T3
#2851
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (28)
Finally, managed to get round to some more practice last night, what a session, came to a perfect drivin setup for my likin.
http://forum.teamxray.com/xform/inde...=1715&setup=t3
Plenty of steering onpower and offpower and the rear end is really planted.
What you guys recommended on the QRC being one is spot on, the extra front width in the front helped alot.
http://forum.teamxray.com/xform/inde...=1715&setup=t3
Plenty of steering onpower and offpower and the rear end is really planted.
What you guys recommended on the QRC being one is spot on, the extra front width in the front helped alot.
#1 moving the inner ackerman post forward on the chassis. in this setting you will have less overall ackerman, but your ackerman settings will be more fine grained
#2 experiment with lowering the front arm mounts. you don't have to move both arm mounts at once, you could say lower the front arm mount and that would generate anti-dive --- something that could be very helpful when running such a high horsepower motor as you are.
#2852
Finally, managed to get round to some more practice last night, what a session, came to a perfect drivin setup for my likin.
http://forum.teamxray.com/xform/inde...=1715&setup=t3
Plenty of steering onpower and offpower and the rear end is really planted.
What you guys recommended on the QRC being one is spot on, the extra front width in the front helped alot.
http://forum.teamxray.com/xform/inde...=1715&setup=t3
Plenty of steering onpower and offpower and the rear end is really planted.
What you guys recommended on the QRC being one is spot on, the extra front width in the front helped alot.
#2853
I agree with hanulec anti dive works really well in mod. And the forward post as well, two things I always run!
#2854
i already have the forword post on my T2 but how will the anti dive help when running MOD?? when you say anti dive, front arm angeled toward the rear or front?? which side is lower?? i guess rear is lower??
#2855
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (28)
Anyway -- anti-dive will help the car from compressing the front suspension so quickly when you get on the brakes. I found it to be necessary when going from 13.5T to basically anything quicker. Also, w/ the T3 you don't have to just use the default +/- 0.75mm options, you can use shims to get less than 0.75mm pin height differences.
#2856
Shesha - i'm happy you've made progress with your setup. i think there is two more things you should try when you can..
#1 moving the inner ackerman post forward on the chassis. in this setting you will have less overall ackerman, but your ackerman settings will be more fine grained
#2 experiment with lowering the front arm mounts. you don't have to move both arm mounts at once, you could say lower the front arm mount and that would generate anti-dive --- something that could be very helpful when running such a high horsepower motor as you are.
#1 moving the inner ackerman post forward on the chassis. in this setting you will have less overall ackerman, but your ackerman settings will be more fine grained
#2 experiment with lowering the front arm mounts. you don't have to move both arm mounts at once, you could say lower the front arm mount and that would generate anti-dive --- something that could be very helpful when running such a high horsepower motor as you are.
Hanulec, am not sure about what you are referring to the ackerman post forward, you mean the plastic piece that slides back and forth from setting 1 to 5 or are you referring to the plastic which the bearings seat in?
I did not touch the post since I was not sure, but played with the antidive, my car initiall before setting up antidive was lacking a bit of on power steering, so when I put in antidive on the front being front plastic piece at 0 degree and rear +0.75 it felt really nice on the corner entry and very comfortable you can see the change on the first lap and corners.
however having lost the steering on mid corner and exit, i switched out the plastic to reverse the process and went with pro-kickup, it was perfect, but then you lost the previous effect but still it was good with the on-power steering which gave me just the right amount.
I could go back to the anti-dive and work on the onpower steering with some other feature on the car to compensate.
#2857
Example front at 0 and rear at +0.75 or -0.75 front and rear 0
Like hanulec said it really keeps the car balanced when you hit the brakes, front end does not squat down.
#2858
#2859
I may have missed this mentioned else where but if you're currently @ 4deg caster, go back to anti-dive then change to 6deg caster blocks to get your mid and exit steering back.
#2860
I know particular guy went through 4 of them in one session...
#2861
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (28)
i'd give anti-dive another try, but this time w/ 6 degree c-hubs. i think that will be the hot modified setup. you might be able to not do the 6 degree c-hubs if your running a lot of camber gain in the front or really stiff springs (have you tried past a 3.0 in the front yet... if not, please do).
#2862
Think I will beg tomorrow on the track for 6 degs of caster, am sure it will be the cherry topping on the setup.
It feels so nice as it is, will play with the plastic bearings seats and see how that goes once i get my hands on the 6 deg caster blocks.
It feels so nice as it is, will play with the plastic bearings seats and see how that goes once i get my hands on the 6 deg caster blocks.
#2864
Any suggestions for a good TC 17.5 setup to use for the no timing stock class at the IIC? We will be on Jaco Blues.
Thanks.
Thanks.