19 Turn Spec Thread
#167
Tech Adept
I think that the Fantom 19T is just the same thing as the Trinity C2. They look completely similar to me, somewhat like the 2PK can, with a different color. I will get both the Fantom 19T and the Reedy Quad Mag to compare.........
#168
Tech Elite
Originally posted by Erlend
I think that the Fantom 19T is just the same thing as the Trinity C2. They look completely similar to me, somewhat like the 2PK can, with a different color. I will get both the Fantom 19T and the Reedy Quad Mag to compare.........
I think that the Fantom 19T is just the same thing as the Trinity C2. They look completely similar to me, somewhat like the 2PK can, with a different color. I will get both the Fantom 19T and the Reedy Quad Mag to compare.........
as far as the differance between the quad mag and the C2 is the quad will have more torque and less RPM. the C2 will have a ton of Rpm and so so torque. If you are running on a tight track I would sugjest (sp) the quad geared very tall. A large open track the C2.
#169
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
Question
Sorry if this has been asked a million times but i need to know whats a good motor setup for a small but fast track.
I am currently running either whatever came with the Reedy Quad, and i am also trying 767+ 766- both with holes with red/purple springs.
Please let me know some new setups, or if i have to change my setups, thanks
Jon
I am currently running either whatever came with the Reedy Quad, and i am also trying 767+ 766- both with holes with red/purple springs.
Please let me know some new setups, or if i have to change my setups, thanks
Jon
#170
I like 4499's with the edges slightly sanded...
for me they ran cooler than 767's.
for me they ran cooler than 767's.
#171
I thought quad mags were more rpm based? Anyway, I know the Fantom motors are based on an existing motor, but whatever it is, the winding has created a great motor. I'm going to start comparing lap times with a Reedy quad mag.
#172
Tech Elite
Originally posted by edseb
I thought quad mags were more rpm based? Anyway, I know the Fantom motors are based on an existing motor, but whatever it is, the winding has created a great motor. I'm going to start comparing lap times with a Reedy quad mag.
I thought quad mags were more rpm based? Anyway, I know the Fantom motors are based on an existing motor, but whatever it is, the winding has created a great motor. I'm going to start comparing lap times with a Reedy quad mag.
#173
O kay, that makes sense, since I've found that the Reedy's seem to work best geared around 6.12 ish.
#174
Tech Elite
Originally posted by edseb
O kay, that makes sense, since I've found that the Reedy's seem to work best geared around 6.12 ish.
O kay, that makes sense, since I've found that the Reedy's seem to work best geared around 6.12 ish.
#175
Originally posted by howard hudson
try the 5.4 to 5.7 range little harder on the brushes and com but tons O ripp
try the 5.4 to 5.7 range little harder on the brushes and com but tons O ripp
maybe with 64 pitch?
#177
Ok.... As JD's been saying we went 19 turn.... I've had nothing but grief with the Reedy.... I'm in the ballpark of 27mm rollout.... I ran the motor for the first time last weekend, it was fine... Cut the comm, replaced the brushes went back this weekend and the motor sucked... Using 767's purple/Red.... I was getting 164-168 watts on my dyno compared with 144 on the Chameleon.... The motor had no torque, no power and even stopped a few times... brushes weren't hanging up, went so far as to put new brushes and springs on it.... Not a happy camper here... When's the V2 hitting our shores???
#179
On my dyno I actually liked the Red/stock silver combo....
I tried the 769's which are 767's w/a hole in them.....
I'm think the purples are too much for the motor....
I tried the 769's which are 767's w/a hole in them.....
I'm think the purples are too much for the motor....