Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
TC design question >

TC design question

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

TC design question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-27-2009, 05:14 AM
  #16  
Tech Champion
 
tc3team's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 6,151
Default

Originally Posted by TRF415boy
It's wider as a result of the pickup points in the arms and the shocks angle, nothing else.
If you made a touring car, you'd be pretty damn sharp on the geometry of it!!!
tc3team is offline  
Old 07-27-2009, 05:34 AM
  #17  
Tech Master
 
TRF415boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,857
Default

Originally Posted by tc3team
If you made a touring car, you'd be pretty damn sharp on the geometry of it!!!
And as I made 2...
TRF415boy is offline  
Old 07-27-2009, 05:38 AM
  #18  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 18
Default

there is weight transfer to be consider under acceleration. controlling how the rear end loads and unloads is key to a proper setup. Thus the longer travel and extra setup pts
ennioc is offline  
Old 07-27-2009, 05:48 AM
  #19  
Tech Elite
 
niznai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: All over the place
Posts: 2,974
Default

Originally Posted by TRF415boy
If you don't know what wheel rates are then I'm sorry but you should look it up before anything as it is the base of everything that relates to suspension settings.

Once you understand it everything will be clear.
I think understanding the physics and using clear language is more important than mastering the lingo. Whatever you call it, any spring in the world is going to be harder to compress as you compress it further. It is a law of physics no matter what you call it.

And it is the same law of physics that says springs compress following a linear relation to force.

Don't worry, I understand these things very well and I agree that the upper mounting point needs to be along the shock shaft otherwise the compressing force imparted by the suspension arm is only partially going to contribute to compressing the shock. And I do agree the more laid down the shock the less of that force is going to compress the shock as the arm sweeps up. The way it was explained initially by sosidge didn't make sense and was wrong, that was my comment.
niznai is offline  
Old 07-27-2009, 05:52 AM
  #20  
Tech Champion
 
tc3team's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 6,151
Default

Originally Posted by TRF415boy
And as I made 2...


Say no more.... I have mystic meg mind I guess?!

I'll stick to strength testing mine, because i'm good at that
tc3team is offline  
Old 07-27-2009, 06:48 AM
  #21  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 265
Default

The RClab has identical front/rear shock towers. Is it a great car?
hermanchauw is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.