Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Tamiya F104 Pro! >

Tamiya F104 Pro!

Like Tree12Likes

Tamiya F104 Pro!

Old 11-16-2010, 03:08 PM
  #3766  
Tech Master
iTrader: (19)
 
gsxr0311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San Francisco CA
Posts: 1,243
Trader Rating: 19 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Greg Sharpe View Post
53599?
54161
gsxr0311 is offline  
Old 11-16-2010, 04:49 PM
  #3767  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (15)
 
MikeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 5,670
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Oortael View Post
What equipment do you use to true your Tamiya tires down?
Are you trueing your tires after each race, or is there a need for new ones?
I Use Integy lathe with 1/12th coned shaped arbors- the cone shape centers the wheels. I only true to a certain size then run the foams until they are done.

I'm working on an nice F1 arbor set that should be here in Jan also...
MikeR is offline  
Old 11-16-2010, 05:27 PM
  #3768  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (48)
 
gashuffer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: RcVille
Posts: 5,230
Trader Rating: 48 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by InspGadgt View Post
The F104 upper arms that I put on my F109 are really tight on the pivot balls and was wondering what you guys were doing with the F104 about that. I have several runs on the car and still the front suspension is too tight.
Instead of sanding them in a dremel I use Mothers polish, works great even gives a mirror image. The pinch also works too but can bind back up over a run sometimes.
gashuffer is offline  
Old 11-16-2010, 06:24 PM
  #3769  
Tech Champion
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Hawaii, USA
Posts: 7,191
Default

Well I assumed after sanding them I would use Mothers on them...They do seem much too tight though for Mothers alone...some sanding will be needed.
InspGadgt is offline  
Old 11-17-2010, 03:21 AM
  #3770  
Tech Regular
 
mini696's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 304
Default

Is the stock chassis compatible with bullet style LIPO plugs?
mini696 is offline  
Old 11-17-2010, 04:26 AM
  #3771  
Tech Master
iTrader: (3)
 
miller tyme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,970
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

I see a few companies carrying the F104 pro and then Ferrari kit on an F104 chassis and a Type 79 F104w can any one tell me difference and advantages one way or the other.
miller tyme is offline  
Old 11-17-2010, 06:13 AM
  #3772  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (19)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Perth, West Australia
Posts: 471
Trader Rating: 19 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by miller tyme View Post
I see a few companies carrying the F104 pro and then Ferrari kit on an F104 chassis and a Type 79 F104w can any one tell me difference and advantages one way or the other.
F104 Pro has carbon fibre chassis, turnbuckles, carbon drive shaft, alloy diff housing, kit foam tyres, body based on 2008 F1 cars, hex screw set.

F104 F60 (or ferrari as you refer to it) has an FRP chassis, stainless steel drive shaft, resin diff housing, body based on the 2009 f1 cars, rubber kit tyres, phillips head screws all around.

The Lotus 79 (F104W as you call it) looks to me like an F104 F60, with a standard F103 front end bolted onto it. From the pics it looks like it has a piss poor shock dampner too. I am not very farmiliar with this car but this is all i have gathered from the limited things ive seen of it online. Why would someone build a car liek this? Looks mainly, nothing else.

What car should you buy? I'd go the 104Pro all the way. The kit is jsut so much more refined. Price may be an issue though, and to be honest, id jsut save up for longer and the get the pro. The F60 you'll get cheaper, but then jsut spend the same amount upgrading it in any case.

That's my opinion anyway.
LordAnubis is offline  
Old 11-17-2010, 06:29 AM
  #3773  
Tech Master
iTrader: (3)
 
miller tyme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,970
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Thank-you...that's what I wanted to know.
miller tyme is offline  
Old 11-17-2010, 07:01 AM
  #3774  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (34)
 
RedBullFiXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Intergalactic Planetary
Posts: 6,542
Trader Rating: 34 (100%+)
Default

The Lotus 79' is the second in a series of F-104W cars. They do have the 103 front arms with 103 wheels, and are aimed at a scale late 70's F1 appearance, when F1 cars were wide and low with ground effects. It's a style that could be quite popular with the F1 crowd in the future, and has no issues keeping up with any 103 or 104 on the track now.

This chassis is quite capable, in fact a driver put one into 2nd in our UF1 series opener.

The kit rubber tires are for looks, so you may want to look at the RIDE or Shimizu tires for racing.

The upper FRP deck is an improvement on the the 104pro upper deck.
It has more flex and room for bullet connectors at the back of the battery box.
As you can see from the picture it has an FRP chassis which may work better than the carbon pro parts.




http://www.tamiyausa.com/product/ite...oduct-id=84122
RedBullFiXX is offline  
Old 11-17-2010, 09:27 AM
  #3775  
Tech Champion
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Hawaii, USA
Posts: 7,191
Default

Problem is I don't think any of those tire companies make a tire the same size as the rear and the normal 103 or 104 tires won't look right with the body.
InspGadgt is offline  
Old 11-17-2010, 10:25 AM
  #3776  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (34)
 
RedBullFiXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Intergalactic Planetary
Posts: 6,542
Trader Rating: 34 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by InspGadgt View Post
Problem is I don't think any of those tire companies make a tire the same size as the rear and the normal 103 or 104 tires won't look right with the body.
Shimizu are working on tires for it, and my guess is RIDE are too...
RedBullFiXX is offline  
Old 11-17-2010, 10:50 AM
  #3777  
Tech Master
 
NiMo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Luton, England
Posts: 1,704
Default

Originally Posted by InspGadgt View Post
Problem is I don't think any of those tire companies make a tire the same size as the rear and the normal 103 or 104 tires won't look right with the body.
Have to agree.
Got the P34, and the F103 rear look far too small, in both Foam and Rubber.

Hoping someone will make Historic sized Rubbers for lotus 79 and Tyrrell P34 type models
NiMo is offline  
Old 11-17-2010, 11:06 AM
  #3778  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 66
Default

Im new to this site and just wanted to contribute, I read every page in this thread and wanted to put some pics up.
My F104 Pro F60:
Tekin R1 pro
Team Checkpoint 13.5 brushless
Duratrax 4000 stick pack lipo
Futaba R603FF Fasst Reciever






I just have to finish a few details and it will be complete!
Mk2 16v-t is offline  
Old 11-17-2010, 02:16 PM
  #3779  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (48)
 
gashuffer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: RcVille
Posts: 5,230
Trader Rating: 48 (100%+)
Default

^^ Did you have to grind down the battery clip to hold in that Li-po or does it just fit directly? Are you going to run the spliter? Nice car.
gashuffer is offline  
Old 11-17-2010, 02:45 PM
  #3780  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
rc_square24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 924
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by gashuffer View Post
^^ Did you have to grind down the battery clip to hold in that Li-po or does it just fit directly? Are you going to run the spliter? Nice car.
I'm not using his brand but I had to grind it down for one of my HK lipos and even more for a reedy 2400 lipo.

I think the clip was sized for sub-c cells, not sure why they did that though.
rc_square24 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.