R/C Tech Forums - The Speed Passion Thread

Hey guys

I have a speed passion 2.0 coming in. should be here in the middle of the week.

was curious any one has a program and profile that would be great in

12 scale single cell lipo. 17.5. (duo can i believe.)

thanks.

Also a generall ball park area for roll out we run a tight track only 5 feet lanes. and technical.

Thanks in advance.

shaun207

03-22-2010 12:56 AM

hi :) i have been reading this thread , and am interested in updating my sp lpf 2.0 ..

ive down loaded the v1.31 and v1.32 , im still waiting for my program box to turn up, but im just trying to get it all ready for my next meeting ...

im having trouble downloading the supercharger software / firmware etc , basicly it wont let me download it ...

plus has anyone got anygood set ups for a tight , twisty and a fast ish track please , it will have a novak 10.5t motor ...

cheers for any help .... :nod:

razzor

03-22-2010 01:31 AM

was briefly at the track and a buddy was trying different combinations on the 231 with a LRP x12 13.5 but we just found it to be lacking.
We run on a gas track with a +- 60m back and infield straight.
The 110 felt and looked noticeably faster as well has having much more bottom end punch.
Looking at his setup sheets it looked like he went through plenty of combinations.
I couldnt do my own testing but will be this coming weekend.

defcone

03-22-2010 02:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by razzor (Post 7168313)

If you read the manual on the x12 motors it'll tell you to not use it with timing advanced speedies.

razzor

03-22-2010 03:59 AM

well its what he had.
He tried it with 0 deg timing and 10 deg.
I still prefer my SP motors.

ronaldo-1234

03-22-2010 04:32 AM

How to find FDR ?

Use the lowest FDR that does not overheat the motor?

Also, which comes first? Setting FDR or ESC?

san.	03-22-2010 05:33 AM

Has anyone noticed that Supercharger v230STOCK and v231STOCK does not like high AMTS values? Had to lower mine to 3.75deg of timing so I can feel the Timing Boost kick in.

Motor was a SP v3 17.5T on a TC.

Cain	03-22-2010 07:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyrrus (Post 7167788)

curious as well as the pre beta stuff like the 110 and 107 didn't work well at all for 1/12 1S versus the tekins.

mac853

03-22-2010 07:14 AM

Could somebody tell me if anyone ran with GT2.1 before then tell me if is really good for stock motors, please?
If somebody could also tell me if its firmware could be upgrade and tuned with Brushless Analysis System, please?

Best regards

merlin_341

03-22-2010 09:05 AM

Hey everybody ! I have been reading here for a while to get some tips.
Now i have some of my own that i would like to share but i cant seem to upload the setup sheet becuse its to large. i can se that some of you guys have posted it here so what am i doing wrong ?
I got my T3 to go ballistic with a 17,5 sp 3.0 and the *231* sw on our small track so i would like to share the settings so somebody else could try them out.

altreyx

03-22-2010 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mac853 (Post 7169018)

Could somebody tell me if anyone ran with GT2.1 before then tell me if is really good for stock motors, please?

I have a 2,1, i tested it last weekend and my impression (with the original firmware), is much faster than my old SPX. Punch and speed is much better with the 2,1
I used it with a SP 10,5 V3 and the car was really fast on the stright and the torque at low speed was very good.
For me it is a really good esc and for sure with the next firmware will be better, but at the same time the original firmware is working really well.
What i found is that the original firmware inside the 2,1 is different respect what there is inside the 1,32 software; i don't know which is the difference but it is working really well.;)

@tomino

03-22-2010 01:45 PM

Hi I'm new into the forum; I'm Italian and also I'm testing the beta firmware with not exceptional results. I'm tested the firmware 230 and 231 with novak ballistic 10,5. I have used FDR 6,7 and 8,4 with same result; much velocity on the straight, but little punch on the corner exit, with motor temp between 65 and 80 degrees C.

Forgive me, but who tells us that the FW 230 and 231 have actually the highest performers with motors 10,5 ?? in the programming software list seems there are a dozen firmware and all with supercharger functions.
No one can tell us which ones are tested (because I imagine that the driver test have tested all firmware in the list) with the greatest satisfaction?

regards @tomino

firecat

03-22-2010 03:26 PM

I have a SP LPF2.0. what firm ware is in it and is there anything new for it and if so where mite i find it thanks

JdogL

03-22-2010 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by @tomino (Post 7170441)

Hi I'm new into the forum; I'm Italian and also I'm testing the beta firmware with not exceptional results. I'm tested the firmware 230 and 231 with novak ballistic 10,5. I have used FDR 6,7 and 8,4 with same result; much velocity on the straight, but little punch on the corner exit, with motor temp between 65 and 80 degrees C.

Forgive me, but who tells us that the FW 230 and 231 have actually the highest performers with motors 10,5 ?? in the programming not thetware list seems there are a dozen firmware and all with supercharger functions.
No one can tell us which ones are tested (because I imagine that the driver test have tested all firmware in the list) with the greatest satisfaction?

regards @tomino

novaks have a soft start to them and they run hotter then tekins or sp's. you would need to get a torque rotor if you want more rip. during the run the novaks will go soft and loose there punch. its not the software thats the prob its the motor. try a speed passion. they have the rip your looking for.

@tomino

03-22-2010 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JdogL (Post 7172947)

good morning (in Italy are 7.45 am)

very grateful for your response;
is really important to have feedback from a team driver SP; doubt that the engine could be the problem, not the software, already come after the first test, and I had already decided to do some test with engine SP.
I never imagined, however, that the Novak, who like so many do RPM, could lose much.
I reasoned that a FW that develops many RPM combined with a Novak would give top performance. Obvious I'm wrong.
Last question: with 10.5 continue testing with the 230 or 231?

All times are GMT -7. It is currently 03:09 PM.

Page 229 of 896

229

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page