Like Tree3Likes

Tamiya M05 Pro

Old 05-12-2009, 11:48 AM
  #106  
Tech Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 957
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Tamiya M05-Pro




Last edited by Hyde; 05-12-2009 at 04:23 PM.
Hyde is offline  
Old 05-12-2009, 12:40 PM
  #107  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
monkeyracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 6,291
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Just a little OCD, huh?
monkeyracing is offline  
Old 05-12-2009, 01:14 PM
  #108  
Tech Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 957
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by monkeyracing View Post
Just a little OCD, huh?
No Obsessive Compulsive Disorder here. Do you suffer from the Disorder?

I'm just a little excited
Hyde is offline  
Old 05-12-2009, 04:39 PM
  #109  
Tech Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 957
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Some ideas for those who want to off road there minis


MONSTER MINIS!




(Pics from fordmike)
Hyde is offline  
Old 05-12-2009, 04:42 PM
  #110  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (28)
 
fordmike65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: LOS ANGELES. CA
Posts: 902
Trader Rating: 28 (97%+)
Default

I think that's the perfect way to combine my love for Mini's & 1.9 scale crawlers!!!! That's it. I'm leaving work early so I can get started
fordmike65 is offline  
Old 05-12-2009, 04:55 PM
  #111  
Tech Fanatic
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 814
Default

Originally Posted by Hyde View Post
Tamiya M05-Pro



Can you post the link to the site where you found the pictures? Need bigger photos for my old peepers.
Crashby is offline  
Old 05-12-2009, 10:35 PM
  #112  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
monkeyracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 6,291
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

So, how about a little analysis? Sure it's premature, but we're all a little obsessive here, aren't we?

A:Looks like the steering knuckles might rise a little higher to meet the new style steering linkage.

B: Does it look like there's room in there for the same gears we use now? Hard to tell.

C: Why the raised rails here? Nothing really attaches to them, except for the transponder on the left side. Strength? Protection for the servo and electronics?

D: It appears they've changed the way the body posts mount. Hopefully they're sticking with some standard that already exists.

E: I'd really like a better look at the upper and lower control arms, both front and rear.

F: As mentioned in an earlier post, we'll probably be able to use current battery mounts. Let the lipos run free!!!

As for other stuff...I'm still not sure if I like the steering setup. Yes the old system was twitchy, but this introduces a lot more failure points and areas where slop might occur. I absolutely love that they've finally provided a proper place to mount electronics. It does make one wonder why they didn't go with a tub chassis, though. It would have been easier to incorporate, and likely stronger.

I also like the low profile body potential offered by this design. Sure, we all like those cute little fat bodied mini cars, but a teeny Ford GT would make me even happier.

Just my two cents.

Jim

Last edited by monkeyracing; 08-10-2011 at 11:29 PM.
monkeyracing is offline  
Old 05-12-2009, 11:46 PM
  #113  
Tech Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 957
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by monkeyracing View Post
So, how about a little analysis? Sure it's premature, but we're all a little obsessive here, aren't we?
Agreed


Originally Posted by monkeyracing View Post
A:Looks like the steering knuckles might rise a little higher to meet the new style steering linkage.
From the look of it thebell-crank system looks even hieght with the direct link stearin like the M3...might be wronge tho

Originally Posted by monkeyracing View Post
B: Does it look like there's room in there for the same gears we use now? Hard to tell.
the motor looks to be the same distance back as the M3... might be wronge as well. Hope it uses the same gears. I have spares so that would be sweet.

But the casing looks a little lower..so it looks like there's some different size gears...we dunno tho..


Originally Posted by monkeyracing View Post
C: Why the raised rails here? Nothing really attaches to them, except for the transponder on the left side. Strength? Protection for the servo and electronics?
I think for strength man. Look at the M3..it has the same rails in the front but they just stuck a servo under it and called it a night..


Originally Posted by monkeyracing View Post
D: It appears they've changed the way the body posts mount. Hopefully they're sticking with some standard that already exists.
I haven't even thought about that! But they wouldn't make new mini bodys with new mounting holes or make us ream some new ones. They look a little different but nah


Originally Posted by monkeyracing View Post
E: I'd really like a better look at the upper and lower control arms, both front and rear.
I wanna see something like the FF01. Something lighter and sleeker. But if its the same o'wells. Its a cool car anyways lol


Originally Posted by monkeyracing View Post
F: As mentioned in an earlier post, we'll probably be able to use current battery mounts. Let the lipos run free!!!
not much of a lipo guy but most of you guys are and I hope there's a bigger verity of cells to use.

NOTE: new people in the hobby jump in using nimh, cad cells so I'm sure tamiya made this newbie friendly and old timer friendly as well.


Originally Posted by monkeyracing View Post
As for other stuff...I'm still not sure if I like the steering setup. Yes the old system was twitchy, but this introduces a lot more failure points and areas where slop might occur.
the stearing setup is not that bad...they did move back words in there steps...but how else would they get the weight off the top without making an all new bell crank? There goal was to take off the goofy servo...how else could it be done...


Originally Posted by monkeyracing View Post
I absolutely love that they've finally provided a proper place to mount electronics. It does make one wonder why they didn't go with a tub chassis, though. It would have been easier to incorporate, and likely stronger.
And I absolutely love that also..there was no "real" place to mount anything on the M3! There's a place for everything and a transponder...

It would have been cool if Tamiya would have made this new chassis look like the old HPI Pro3 chassis... simple, stronge, good looking..but that's my honest opinion..
Hyde is offline  
Old 05-13-2009, 09:13 AM
  #114  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Jam-ehz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 592
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

At least this model will address the M-03's problem of having to little weight in the rear.. it'll be distributed much more evenly front to back..

To keep things equal across all the models, they'd have to keep the same gears and ratios, as well as relative shape.. you can't change the geometry too much, 'cause that's what makes the Mini's so cool and fun!

I have a feeling the M and L extensions will just attach right between the servo and the rear bulkhead.. there's nowhere else to plausibly separate it, otherwise you'd have to buy different length steering rods.

Wow, those steering rods at the front are short! What will that do to the ackerman, since they're all sliding equally along one steering brace now?
Jam-ehz is offline  
Old 05-13-2009, 06:12 PM
  #115  
Tech Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 957
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Jam-ehz View Post
At least this model will address the M-03's problem of having to little weight in the rear.. it'll be distributed much more evenly front to back..
I never really ran my eletronics in there rear...but I'm glad they have a home for once lol


Originally Posted by Jam-ehz View Post
To keep things equal across all the models, they'd have to keep the same gears and ratios, as well as relative shape.. you can't change the geometry too much, 'cause that's what makes the Mini's so cool and fun!
well the M1 had a quicker gear ratio, so but them changing this wouldn't be suprizing.. But more linkly there the same gears.


Originally Posted by Jam-ehz View Post
I have a feeling the M and L extensions will just attach right between the servo and the rear bulkhead.. there's nowhere else to plausibly separate it, otherwise you'd have to buy different length steering rods.
That's super true and another thing I haven't thought of... lol I only like this chassis for the 210 wheelbase mini I'm not a huge fan of the 224mm 239mm.... but yeah seems the rod would have to extend further...

Originally Posted by Jam-ehz View Post
Wow, those steering rods at the front are short! What will that do to the ackerman, since they're all sliding equally along one steering brace now?
The ackerman looks pretty basic like all there other models...where do you see a problem?
Hyde is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 05:51 AM
  #116  
Tech Master
iTrader: (15)
 
Big Daddy Cool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Makati, Philippines
Posts: 1,725
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default



Nice!!! But I still wish they designed a front bumper for this new chassis.
Big Daddy Cool is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 06:06 AM
  #117  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
monkeyracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 6,291
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Good morning!

Thanks for the pic!
monkeyracing is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 07:55 AM
  #118  
Tech Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 957
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Big Daddy Cool View Post


Nice!!! But I still wish they designed a front bumper for this new chassis.
I got an email from Chee Yong from Tamiya I'm Guessing and he said it will be at the Shizuoka Show and there it is!!!!

Yeah front bumber would've been a huge upgrade but can't complain.. There's always ways to make one or for them to hear us and make one!

It looks VERY much like the M1....Updated M1 to me...all the other pics makes the car look 100% different but thid veiw looks a little fishy.... still going to buy some and peep it out

Who's buying one...or two?

P.S. Thanks for the morning pic B.D.C. if you can get more pics it new info please post
Hyde is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 09:47 AM
  #119  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
monkeyracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 6,291
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Ask and ye shall receive.

Last edited by monkeyracing; 08-10-2011 at 11:29 PM.
monkeyracing is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 09:57 AM
  #120  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (8)
 
rccardr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Secret Underground Laboratory
Posts: 2,353
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Huh. Looks to me like the chassis may be unitized from the front all the way to the rear arm mounts/shock tower area. If so, gearbox maintenance could be very complex. Anybody able to give us a shot of the bottom?
rccardr is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.