Belt Sizes from Various Cars
|
|||
#1

Would I be able to get some help for belt sizes (teeth) from various cars?
(F/R)
HB Cyclone (169/62) (3.5mm)
HB Cyclone TC (170/63) (3.5mm)
Yokomo BD (172/63) (3.5mm)
Kyosho TF5 (149/74) (3.0mm)
TRF 415(169/59) (3.0mm)
TRF 416 (172/58) (3.0mm)
Xray T1/ T2 / 007 (169/60) (3.0mm)
Xray T2 008 (169/61) (3.0mm)
AE TC5 (172/64) (3.75mm)
RDX/Phi (169/62/70/71) (3.0mm)
Mi2/3 (171/60) (3.6mm)
S400 (167/59) (3.5mm)
Robitronics Avid (185/62)
(F/R)
HB Cyclone (169/62) (3.5mm)
HB Cyclone TC (170/63) (3.5mm)
Yokomo BD (172/63) (3.5mm)
Kyosho TF5 (149/74) (3.0mm)
TRF 415(169/59) (3.0mm)
TRF 416 (172/58) (3.0mm)
Xray T1/ T2 / 007 (169/60) (3.0mm)
Xray T2 008 (169/61) (3.0mm)
AE TC5 (172/64) (3.75mm)
RDX/Phi (169/62/70/71) (3.0mm)
Mi2/3 (171/60) (3.6mm)
S400 (167/59) (3.5mm)
Robitronics Avid (185/62)
Last edited by airborneranger; 03-27-2009 at 01:53 PM.
#2

(F/R)
Cyclone (169/62) and (170/63)
BD (172/63)
TRF 415/416 (169/170/59/60)
Xray (169/60/61/62)
TC5 (172/63)
RDX/Phi (169/62/70/71)
Mi2/3 (171/60)
S400 (167/59)
what???
Cyclone (169/62) and (170/63)
BD (172/63)
TRF 415/416 (169/170/59/60)
Xray (169/60/61/62)
TC5 (172/63)
RDX/Phi (169/62/70/71)
Mi2/3 (171/60)
S400 (167/59)
what???

#3

scary!

#4

wholly molly
Thanks
Are most of the belts 3mm?

Are most of the belts 3mm?
#5
#6
Tech Elite

iTrader: (102)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Far away from Covid19 but close to 20
Posts: 4,129
Trader Rating: 102 (100%+)

Holy Belt Crimes.
someone must go to Jeopardy
someone must go to Jeopardy
#7

Do you also happen to know the widths of each?
#8

well, duh.. 
i know the xray/corally belts are real narrow, whereas the schumacher/ae ones are a smidge wider. these are close estimates:
Cyclone (169/62) and (170/63) (3.5mm)
BD (172/63) (3.5mm)
TRF 415/416 (169/170/59/60) (3.5mm)
Xray (169/60/61/62) (3.0mm)
TC5 (172/63) (3.75mm)
RDX/Phi (169/62/70/71) (3.0mm)
Mi2/3 (171/60) (3.75mm)
S400 (167/59) (3.5mm)
are you at all concerned with the tooth profile?
(this is cracking me up).

i know the xray/corally belts are real narrow, whereas the schumacher/ae ones are a smidge wider. these are close estimates:
Cyclone (169/62) and (170/63) (3.5mm)
BD (172/63) (3.5mm)
TRF 415/416 (169/170/59/60) (3.5mm)
Xray (169/60/61/62) (3.0mm)
TC5 (172/63) (3.75mm)
RDX/Phi (169/62/70/71) (3.0mm)
Mi2/3 (171/60) (3.75mm)
S400 (167/59) (3.5mm)
are you at all concerned with the tooth profile?


#9



I guess that would be important too if I was trying to swap belts.
#11

Before I got rid of my xray t2's, I used tower to find a 169T belt. What I found was a cyclone belt at about half the cost. Not all of towers listed belts have tooth counts, but enough do.
When I was parking lost racing and needed a rear belt for my T2, I went to the local hobby shop and picked up a RS4 belt and narrowed it to 3mm. Not bad, I was able to fix my car the same day and not pay shipping, and since it was a 1/2 off sale item I only paid like $4 after tax.
When I was parking lost racing and needed a rear belt for my T2, I went to the local hobby shop and picked up a RS4 belt and narrowed it to 3mm. Not bad, I was able to fix my car the same day and not pay shipping, and since it was a 1/2 off sale item I only paid like $4 after tax.
#12

well, duh.. 
i know the xray/corally belts are real narrow, whereas the schumacher/ae ones are a smidge wider. these are close estimates:
Cyclone (169/62) and (170/63) (3.5mm)
BD (172/63) (3.5mm)
TRF 415/416 (169/170/59/60) (3.5mm)
Xray (169/60/61/62) (3.0mm)
TC5 (172/63) (3.75mm)
RDX/Phi (169/62/70/71) (3.0mm)
Mi2/3 (171/60) (3.75mm)
S400 (167/59) (3.5mm)
are you at all concerned with the tooth profile?
(this is cracking me up).

i know the xray/corally belts are real narrow, whereas the schumacher/ae ones are a smidge wider. these are close estimates:
Cyclone (169/62) and (170/63) (3.5mm)
BD (172/63) (3.5mm)
TRF 415/416 (169/170/59/60) (3.5mm)
Xray (169/60/61/62) (3.0mm)
TC5 (172/63) (3.75mm)
RDX/Phi (169/62/70/71) (3.0mm)
Mi2/3 (171/60) (3.75mm)
S400 (167/59) (3.5mm)
are you at all concerned with the tooth profile?


What about tooth profile ?
Which tooth type has less rolling resistance
The Rat
#13

I believe the urethane belts have the least drag on tight radius pullys. The Nylon Tooth belts have the least rolling resistance.
Either way, you want belts with low strech such as belts with kevlar or spectra
Either way, you want belts with low strech such as belts with kevlar or spectra
#14

Just some updates...
Cyclone (169/62) (3.5mm)
Cyclone TC (170/63) (3.5mm)
BD (172/63) (3.5mm)
TRF 415(169/59) (3.0mm)
TRF 416 (172/58) (3.0mm)
Xray T1/ T2 / 007 (169/60) (3.0mm)
Xray T2 008 (169/61) (3.0mm)
TC5 (172/63) (3.75mm)
RDX/Phi (169/62/70/71) (3.0mm)
Mi2/3 (171/60) (3.6mm)
S400 (167/59) (3.5mm)

Cyclone (169/62) (3.5mm)
Cyclone TC (170/63) (3.5mm)
BD (172/63) (3.5mm)
TRF 415(169/59) (3.0mm)
TRF 416 (172/58) (3.0mm)
Xray T1/ T2 / 007 (169/60) (3.0mm)
Xray T2 008 (169/61) (3.0mm)
TC5 (172/63) (3.75mm)
RDX/Phi (169/62/70/71) (3.0mm)
Mi2/3 (171/60) (3.6mm)
S400 (167/59) (3.5mm)
Last edited by Skitee; 02-28-2009 at 02:11 AM.
#15

If the belts are the same teeth, does that mean that they are the same length?