Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Lipo "C" difference >

Lipo "C" difference

Lipo "C" difference

Old 04-21-2011, 06:33 PM
  #31  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 609
Default

The key to choosing a Lipo battery pack is getting one that has the highest C rating and capacity you can afford. Not only will the car be faster, but the battery will be under less stress with a really good pack meaning it will last a long time.

Also I recommend not choosing the really light Lipos that look a little like the old stick packs we used to use as these are really light weight making balancing of the car a problem and also are not as powerful probably due to how they have been made to be the same size as the old stick packs.

For me the IP5600 50C and IP6200 60C are awesome for any application.

Mike
ixlr8nz is offline  
Old 04-22-2011, 04:14 AM
  #32  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (20)
 
kcunamay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 392
Trader Rating: 20 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by ixlr8nz View Post
The key to choosing a Lipo battery pack is getting one that has the highest C rating and capacity you can afford. Not only will the car be faster, but the battery will be under less stress with a really good pack meaning it will last a long time.

Also I recommend not choosing the really light Lipos that look a little like the old stick packs we used to use as these are really light weight making balancing of the car a problem and also are not as powerful probably due to how they have been made to be the same size as the old stick packs.

For me the IP5600 50C and IP6200 60C are awesome for any application.

Mike
I've experienced the same thing.

I have done back to back testing with a T3'11 running boosted 17.5 equipped with a 3400 25c orion pack and then my thunder power 50/100c 5200mah pack. With the 3400 25c, the car was much slower everywhere on the track and after a 5 min heat motor temps were above 180. During the next qualifier, I swapped in my TP 5200 50/100c and not only was the car MUCH FASTER, motor temps were much lower as well. In the 140 range.

The only swap was the battery and there was 0 binding on the car.
kcunamay is offline  
Old 04-22-2011, 05:15 AM
  #33  
Tech Elite
 
Skiddins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Windsor, UK
Posts: 4,911
Default

It doesn't explain that there is no standard for measuring the 'c' rating so you can't compare between manufactures.
The reason we want all the numbers as high as possible is so that we finish a run with as higher voltage as possible.
In theory, it would be ideal if the voltage at the end of a run was exactly the same as at the beginniing.
Skiddins is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.