Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
1/10 R/C F1's...Pics, Discussions, Whatever... >

1/10 R/C F1's...Pics, Discussions, Whatever...

Like Tree2928Likes

1/10 R/C F1's...Pics, Discussions, Whatever...

Old 05-23-2014, 05:47 PM
  #10291  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 187
Default

Originally Posted by Racer1984
I'm wondering, is there any reason apart from simplicity that there's so few double wishbone front suspensions on F1 cars?

I was looking for a decent front end for my F104 and couldn't find one that'd tick all the boxes for me so I'm tempted to build my own, but I'm not sure which route to take (double wishbone vs. solid lower arms vs. solid lower+upper).
If I had to guess, I'd say it was a couple of reasons. Durability for one thing. Real F1 suspension (and most open wheel racecars) are notoriously fragile and couldn't take the beating we put our cars through. You'd be replacing arms every couple of battery runs. Well I would at least. So sturdy bottom arms and (sometimes) movable upper wishbones is the name of the game.

Second, I'd say is the amount of travel in an F1 car's suspension, both 1:10 and 1:1. The real benefit of a double wishbone suspension is to manipulate camber gain throughout the suspension travel. With the suspension on an F1 car travelling so little and the tires taking up most of the "suspension" action, the arms (and their movement) ends up being secondary. So might as well make them as simple as possible, meaning camber is relatively static.

The Exotek upper arm set is pretty adjustable and would pretty much cover all you'd want in a "pan-style" F1 chassis. Other options that are more double wishbone-y are Tamiya's old F201 chassis or 3Racing F113.
viking44 is offline  
Old 05-23-2014, 06:56 PM
  #10292  
Tech Champion
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Hawaii, USA
Posts: 7,191
Default

Originally Posted by Racer1984
I'm wondering, is there any reason apart from simplicity that there's so few double wishbone front suspensions on F1 cars?

I was looking for a decent front end for my F104 and couldn't find one that'd tick all the boxes for me so I'm tempted to build my own, but I'm not sure which route to take (double wishbone vs. solid lower arms vs. solid lower+upper).
Simplicity is one reason, the others would be weight and durability. Double wishbone suspensions on pan cars, especially open wheel F1 cars, tend to be quite fragile. Also it is difficult finding a good place to mount the shocks with no room for a shock tower. Sure you could set up a push rod suspension but that is heavy and adds weight up high.
InspGadgt is offline  
Old 05-24-2014, 05:05 AM
  #10293  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3
Default

@viking44, @InspGadgt

Thanks for the answers - when I think about it it makes sense that simplicity and low weight beat a "perfect" geometry in an F1 car. The F113 front assembly looks pretty crowded and heavy..

The main reason I'm still looking and haven't got the Exotek front end yet is that it mounts on the original F104 posts which keeps the whole front assembly a bit too bulky for my liking - a quick meassure shows that it takes up around 9cm (or 3,5 in) front-to-back, which I see as a wasted space and if I can shave an inch or even more from that, I could shorten the whole chasis for better carpet action, lay out my electronics more cleverly, put in a better steering system, etc.

The closest to what I'm looking for is 3racing F109, but that's 200mm, I'm trying to keep within 190mm as various races here go by various rules, from 190 to 210mm width. My motivation is trying to get the best out of a (sub)190mm car even when others have the width advantage.

In any case, it looks like I'll get the Exotek front end if I fail to come up with a decent design of my own.
Racer1984 is offline  
Old 05-24-2014, 05:28 AM
  #10294  
Tech Master
 
heretic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: europe
Posts: 1,110
Default

Apparently Exotek has been working on a narrow front end la F113.
heretic is offline  
Old 05-24-2014, 11:03 AM
  #10295  
Tech Champion
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Hawaii, USA
Posts: 7,191
Default

The F103 chassis is much shorter than the F104 but it runs the battery crosswise instead of in-line. But the F104 bodies look not so good mounted on a F103 chassis because the body is too long for the wheelbase.
InspGadgt is offline  
Old 05-24-2014, 06:07 PM
  #10296  
Tech Regular
 
Luppi Stefano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Italy
Posts: 490
Default

Originally Posted by J-PaP




Thought I would share what I consider to be the proper way to widen the F104.. The set up is slightly different because I use a Exotek F1R2. Car is 10mm wider at the front as a result and using the rsector widening kit to widen the back. Result allows for a more stable car with higher cornering speed but a lot less compromised steering response due to retaining the pivot point at the same point as the standard.
is very similar to our Fenix S5 Ultra front arm....


Luppi Stefano is offline  
Old 05-24-2014, 10:32 PM
  #10297  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (12)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 572
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Luppi Stefano
is very similar to our Fenix S5 Ultra front arm....
Funnily enough I tried to contact Fenix racing a number of times this year to purchase the front arm to suit an F104. I got a response to my first email saying it was due in a few weeks and then never got any further responses back when I followed up asking for pricing and if it was available yet.

Figured why wait anymore when I can come up with a solution myself. I don't agree it is very similar. The only thing that is the same is that both use the Schumacher Mi5 wishbone sockets. Apart from that the kingpin holder is totally different(Yokomo) and the overall shape is based on the original Tamiya plastic arms, adjusted to suit pre-existing holes in the Exotek F1R2 chassis. Plus it's been made to be 10mm wider than the factory Tamiya arms.
J-PaP is offline  
Old 05-25-2014, 06:14 AM
  #10298  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (22)
 
robk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
Posts: 8,204
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

The nice part is the TRF101W or whatever they are calling it has this same type of lower arm for a 190mm setup. When the car comes out the lower arm should be available to make a setup like this.
robk is offline  
Old 05-25-2014, 10:07 PM
  #10299  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 14
Default

Just finished putting together this FGX.



It's my first onroad car so car park bashing for now, but will consider racing it in the near future once I get a feel for it.
tails is offline  
Old 05-26-2014, 01:06 AM
  #10300  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
G-rem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Belgium
Posts: 785
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Very nice! What kind of colour did you use to paint wings?
G-rem is offline  
Old 05-26-2014, 08:11 AM
  #10301  
Tech Adept
 
Acid_CZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Valachian Kingdom
Posts: 204
Default

Originally Posted by robk
The nice part is the TRF101W or whatever they are calling it has this same type of lower arm for a 190mm setup. When the car comes out the lower arm should be available to make a setup like this.
Is there any guess when will be TRF101W available?
Acid_CZ is offline  
Old 05-26-2014, 12:08 PM
  #10302  
Tech Regular
 
Luppi Stefano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Italy
Posts: 490
Default

Originally Posted by J-PaP
Funnily enough I tried to contact Fenix racing a number of times this year to purchase the front arm to suit an F104. I got a response to my first email saying it was due in a few weeks and then never got any further responses back when I followed up asking for pricing and if it was available yet.

Figured why wait anymore when I can come up with a solution myself. I don't agree it is very similar. The only thing that is the same is that both use the Schumacher Mi5 wishbone sockets. Apart from that the kingpin holder is totally different(Yokomo) and the overall shape is based on the original Tamiya plastic arms, adjusted to suit pre-existing holes in the Exotek F1R2 chassis. Plus it's been made to be 10mm wider than the factory Tamiya arms.
I'm very sorry, but apparently there was some communication problem
there is no S5 Ultra for 104, this arms is only fit our FENIX Chassis
compliments for your front arms, really well done!
Luppi Stefano is offline  
Old 05-27-2014, 04:01 PM
  #10303  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1
Default

Looking to paint my F104 F60 body the recommended Tamiya color, but it looks like the 89922 recommended color by Tamiya is no longer available. Is PS-60 86060 the only other alternative. However, looking at the Tamiya site, the two colors are vastly different. Any idea where to get something close to 89922 in the US? Thanks,
flyingmachine is offline  
Old 05-27-2014, 10:10 PM
  #10304  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
josecarlo1129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Las Vegas/ Bahrain
Posts: 437
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

How about these gorgeous bodies?

josecarlo1129 is offline  
Old 05-27-2014, 10:25 PM
  #10305  
Tech Champion
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Hawaii, USA
Posts: 7,191
Default

Very cool...who is making them?
InspGadgt is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.