Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
TC Euros 2008, Spain >

TC Euros 2008, Spain

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

TC Euros 2008, Spain

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-02-2008, 11:12 AM
  #46  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
c1 racin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Gulfport, MS
Posts: 608
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

This is the Amain list that they have up on their site.

Final qualifying order

1. Ronald Volker (DE) [Hot Bodies] - 2pts
2. Marc Rheinard (DE) [Tamiya] - 4pts
3. Viktor Wilck (SE) [Tamiya] - 5pts
4. Andy Moore (GB) [Hot Bodies] - 6pts
5. Teemo Leino (FI) [Xray] - 6pts
6. Jilles Groskamp (NL) [Tamiya] - 7pts
7. Marc Fischer (DE) [Corally] - 8pts
8. Steven Weiss (DE) [Xray] - 9pts
9. Alexander Hagberg (SE) [Xray] - 11pts
10. Elliott Harper (GB) [Xray] - 15pts
c1 racin is offline  
Old 08-02-2008, 12:06 PM
  #47  
Tech Elite
 
Skiddins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Windsor, UK
Posts: 4,952
Default

Manufacturer numbers (reported on RedRC);

Xray - 46
Tamiya - 25
Corally - 18
Schumacher - 16
Hot Bodies - 15
Yokomo - 7
Associated - 6
Kyosho - 4
TOP - 2
Losi - 2
Team Magic - 1
Serpent - 1
Robitronic - 1
Skiddins is offline  
Old 08-02-2008, 01:54 PM
  #48  
Tech Regular
 
RocketRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Durban South Africa
Posts: 337
Default

excellent numbers for XRAY with 4 in the top 10! Ronald seems to have commanded the qualifiers. pretty much like Lewis Hamilton did at the F1 qualifier today! it's great when you have a car that works so well. you can go in with so much of confidence. and that's great, 'cos it allows you to race with a clear head!

Last edited by RocketRacer; 08-02-2008 at 01:55 PM. Reason: spelling
RocketRacer is offline  
Old 08-02-2008, 03:31 PM
  #49  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (14)
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 257
Trader Rating: 14 (89%+)
Default

Exactlt Rocket, must make it so much easier to just drive..

Hey what on earth is the go with Viktor Wilck missing marshalling therefore front row spot? Surely these guys must have team managers/gophers etc to give them a gentle whack on the chops if they are going to run late

Alexander Hagberg has to be a dark horse for this, steady rise throughtout the weekend.. Now in the A. Well done.
autoset is offline  
Old 08-03-2008, 05:12 AM
  #50  
Tech Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 900
Default

Originally Posted by Steve Weiss
Amazing what happens when an industry stands behind something instead of tucking tail and running at the first sign of weakness... maybe we can learn a lesson from that over here?
Not quite, Steve, but a good point...

The European Federation (EFRA) changed the class from 6-cell to 5-cell in order to prevent the problems with tyre wear and improve motor reliability. It worked, in spades! Mod is now enjoying a huge renaissance in Europe, because the cars are driveable, and the reliability is high. Because of the 5-cell limit, LiPo plays no role, and because of the 5-cell limit, weight is down and that helps tyre wear and reliability. It's a virtuous circle...

Manufacturers want a healthy class to sell into, so they've done their bit to provide cars that work with the new Rules. That hasn't made things any less competitive, but because anyone can get a Mod car to go, it's done wonders for participation - everyone wins!

The impression we get over here is that the US is set against 5-cell, and that reflects in the IFMAR decision to run 6-cell at this year's Worlds. In Italy 2006, there were serious problems with speedos and motors, and that will be worse in the heat of Thailand. Japan run 4-cell, Europe runs 5-cell and both have high participation. US runs 6-cell...

For Stock classes (very popular in US compared to Europe) 6-cell seems OK, but it is very interesting to see the 12th and World GT entries at the IIC - large entry and using 4-cell!
SlowerOne is offline  
Old 08-03-2008, 06:40 AM
  #51  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (22)
 
robk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
Posts: 8,201
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

There's a lot of lipo people in the US who say 5 cell is a conspiracy against them don't ask me...

Still even 5 cell would not increase mod racing here. Very few people want to leave stock motor racing.
robk is offline  
Old 08-03-2008, 06:48 AM
  #52  
Tech Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
academygaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 754
Default

Without wanting to go waaaaay offtopic, US tracks appear to be a lot smaller and more tight/twisty/technical than Euro or Asian tracks, mod cars on smaller tracks are tough to drive for the best guys, never mind the ''less ability-blessed''.
academygaz is offline  
Old 08-03-2008, 10:26 AM
  #53  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (26)
 
Hebiki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 12,922
Trader Rating: 26 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by academygaz
Without wanting to go waaaaay offtopic, US tracks appear to be a lot smaller and more tight/twisty/technical than Euro or Asian tracks, mod cars on smaller tracks are tough to drive for the best guys, never mind the ''less ability-blessed''.
very true, our local track here doesnt have a huge straight like that Vila Real track does.
Hebiki is offline  
Old 08-03-2008, 12:52 PM
  #54  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
c1 racin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Gulfport, MS
Posts: 608
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Final results (Official)
1. Marc Rheinard (DE) [Tamiya] - 3pts (1:1 / 2:10 / 3:2)
2. Vikor Wilck (SE) [Tamiya] - 4pts (1:4 / 2:1 / 3:3)
3. Ronald Volker (DE) [Hot Bodies] - 5pts (1:10 / 2:4 / 3:1)
4. Andy Moore (GB) [Hot Bodies] - 7pts (1:5 / 2:2 / 3:8)
5. Teemo Leino (FI) [Xray] - 9pts (1:2/ 2:9 / 3:7)
6. Alexander Hagberg (SE) [Xray] - 9pts (1:3 / 2:7 / 3:6)
7. Jilles Groskamp (NL) [Tamiya] - 9pts (1:6 / 2:3 / 3:10)
8. Steven Weiss (DE) [Xray] - 9pts (1:7 / 2:5 / 3:4)
9. Elliott Harper (GB) [Xray] - 11pts (1:9 / 2:6 / 3:5)
10. Marc Fischer (DE) [Corally] - 16pts (1:8 / 2:8 / 3:9)
c1 racin is offline  
Old 08-03-2008, 02:16 PM
  #55  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (24)
 
wallstreet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,020
Trader Rating: 24 (93%+)
Default

Originally Posted by academygaz
Without wanting to go waaaaay offtopic, US tracks appear to be a lot smaller and more tight/twisty/technical than Euro or Asian tracks, mod cars on smaller tracks are tough to drive for the best guys, never mind the ''less ability-blessed''.


I dont think that arguement holds water ..


They come here to the states and dont seem to have any problems cleaning house at our national events on tracks alot smaller than the ones they run on in europe.
wallstreet is offline  
Old 08-03-2008, 11:47 PM
  #56  
Tech Master
iTrader: (18)
 
over gear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,160
Trader Rating: 18 (100%+)
Default

Anyone have more info as to why Rheinard was disqualified in A2? i read redrc and it said his battery was too long??? what's happening? i didn't know battery will grow like plants.
over gear is offline  
Old 08-04-2008, 02:00 AM
  #57  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10
Default

It's a certain make of cells that are not the correct measurements. I know exactly what cells they are, my son had taken some brand new ones of the same make, and all his were deemed illegal so he had to borrow off other teammates all meeting. Totally ruined his racing.
I'm not prepared to say which make of cells they were though.
I'll leave that to other people
xrayracer2 is offline  
Old 08-04-2008, 02:04 AM
  #58  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 286
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Over the past few years many battery companies have resorted to both increasing the size of cells and making the cell housing thinner in order to maximise the cell capacity. This happened to the extent that even new cells were larger than the industry-standard sub-C specification which is what we are supposed to be running. Moreover when charged at higher amps the pressure within the cells builds up and due to the thinner housing the cells expand (both become longer and thicker), causing them to be even further outside the Sub-C cel specification. In addition this is contributing to the safety issues of the past 2 years.

In an effort to halt this unwanted trend EFRA informed all battery makers that starting April 1st the measures of the sub-C cel specification would be included in the EFRA rules and would be teched at major EFRA events. Marc's battery from the 2nd final was apparantly slightly longer than the sub-C cel spec (even after it cooled down) costing him his 2nd final result in accordance with the improved EFRA rules.
tonyv is offline  
Old 08-04-2008, 02:07 AM
  #59  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 286
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by xrayracer2
It's a certain make of cells that are not the correct measurements. I know exactly what cells they are, my son had taken some brand new ones of the same make, and all his were deemed illegal so he had to borrow off other teammates all meeting. Totally ruined his racing.
I'm not prepared to say which make of cells they were though.
I'll leave that to other people
Actually, I believe most makes are, at best, very close to the edge anyway and charging at high amps even once can cause those to be illegal. To the best of my knowledge only one company actually used 2007 to develop a true EFRA spec cel that is guaranteed to stay within the sub-C size limits.
tonyv is offline  
Old 08-04-2008, 05:38 AM
  #60  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
lignum vitae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 317
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

so tell people what cells they were so they dont purchase them, witch might make the company adress the problem.
lignum vitae is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.