Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Tamiya mini cooper >

Tamiya mini cooper

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree288Likes

Tamiya mini cooper

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-20-2015, 02:42 AM
  #24871  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 290
Default

Does anyone have trouble with the Tamiya Mini Cooper Racing body not sitting square on the M05 chassis. I find that one of the rear wheel arches always rub, no matter how I mount it on the chassis. I've got a feeling its caused by the the leads coming out of the battery pushing the body to one side.

Any tips or tricks to make it sit right?
filippimini is offline  
Old 07-20-2015, 04:44 AM
  #24872  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
sakadachi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 2,354
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by filippimini
Does anyone have trouble with the Tamiya Mini Cooper Racing body not sitting square on the M05 chassis. I find that one of the rear wheel arches always rub, no matter how I mount it on the chassis. I've got a feeling its caused by the the leads coming out of the battery pushing the body to one side.

Any tips or tricks to make it sit right?
I use a velcro strap to pull the battery leads towards the center of the chassis and tie it down. My Rover Mini bodies sit even left to right and no rubbing on the rear arch.

If your battery leads still bulges the body, try shifting the battery towards the right side of the chassis by adding 3 or 5mm spacers to the battery holder end pieces (You will need to use longer screws).


BTW, as you all already know, I am very picky about scratches on the body. I place clear vinyl tape on the inside of the body where the leads and battery mount pieces might rub the body to prevent paint removal.

Last edited by sakadachi; 07-20-2015 at 04:58 AM.
sakadachi is offline  
Old 07-20-2015, 06:12 AM
  #24873  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (18)
 
axle182's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 3,785
Trader Rating: 18 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by monkeyracing
It's a little like American football, but for men.
lol this made me smile
axle182 is offline  
Old 07-20-2015, 06:27 AM
  #24874  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (18)
 
axle182's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 3,785
Trader Rating: 18 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Granpa
Trying to get the car to minimum weight is nuts. For me, they just don't handle under 1300 or so, on lo-grip asphalt.
Ive been saying this for years, and I race on Carpet. Even with silvercans, the minis would handle the corners much better with a little weight. My 03 has a line of lead in the middle where the chassis halves joined.
axle182 is offline  
Old 07-20-2015, 06:40 AM
  #24875  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (18)
 
axle182's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 3,785
Trader Rating: 18 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Granpa
Actually, I apologize for the M06 comment. Some of the best guys I know have worked on that chassis and have never made it competitive. We've bench raced that car a lot and the consensus is that it is a better carpet car than asphalt. I tend to, whenever I see one, make the sign of the cross and walk away as rapidly as possible. Danny Eggar, our current TCS Mini Champ, is playing with his. If anyone can figure out how to make it go, he can. He's making some progress, but the car is tough to get balanced for all the corners

Hope this was more informative.
Yeah the M06 isn't worth the headache on carpet IMHO. I loved working on it, as its a nig challenge. the FWD cars can be driven hard and put away wet. The M06 requires finesse, and a very very good setup. The issue I always found was the setup window, to get everything from the RWD, was so slim, and small change in track condition, tire wear, and good hit from Ivan, put you right back to square one, trying to figure what to change. So while it was challenging and very rewarding when you get it right, it wasn't worth it in the long run for me. With the FWD I could concentrate on racing and battling with the guys, the M06, I was constantly thinking chassis tweaks, to try to keep the chassis in the sweet spot. And that was when I went to the races with a large box of tires, three sets of shocks etc.....

The M06, when in the sweet spot, is quicker than the fwds for sure.
axle182 is offline  
Old 07-20-2015, 07:20 AM
  #24876  
Tech Elite
 
niznai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: All over the place
Posts: 2,974
Default

Originally Posted by axle182
Yeah the M06 isn't worth the headache on carpet IMHO. I loved working on it, as its a nig challenge. the FWD cars can be driven hard and put away wet. The M06 requires finesse, and a very very good setup. The issue I always found was the setup window, to get everything from the RWD, was so slim, and small change in track condition, tire wear, and good hit from Ivan, put you right back to square one, trying to figure what to change. So while it was challenging and very rewarding when you get it right, it wasn't worth it in the long run for me. With the FWD I could concentrate on racing and battling with the guys, the M06, I was constantly thinking chassis tweaks, to try to keep the chassis in the sweet spot. And that was when I went to the races with a large box of tires, three sets of shocks etc.....

The M06, when in the sweet spot, is quicker than the fwds for sure.
I have no racing experience with my M06 (not allowed here) but I would say you're not far from truth. However, I would place the accent elsewhere. I think the M06, like many of Tamiya's forays into left field is needlessly overcomplicated and ultimately disfunctional. Which is too bad, because Tamiya had the recipe right the first time around, when they made the M02 (incidentally, my first ever kit). That is a lot easier to set up and tune, and much easier to drive, almost as easy as the FWD cars. Perhaps that alongside the Goose (which I also have) should have provided the template for a RWD platform but with the motor in front of the rear wheels rather than hanging out the back. 1/12 pan cars are another source of inspiration that proves RWD can work very well on road. Maybe Tamiya will take another shot at it sometime.
niznai is offline  
Old 07-20-2015, 07:41 AM
  #24877  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (18)
 
axle182's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 3,785
Trader Rating: 18 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by niznai
I have no racing experience with my M06 (not allowed here) but I would say you're not far from truth. However, I would place the accent elsewhere. I think the M06, like many of Tamiya's forays into left field is needlessly overcomplicated and ultimately disfunctional. Which is too bad, because Tamiya had the recipe right the first time around, when they made the M02 (incidentally, my first ever kit). That is a lot easier to set up and tune, and much easier to drive, almost as easy as the FWD cars. Perhaps that alongside the Goose (which I also have) should have provided the template for a RWD platform but with the motor in front of the rear wheels rather than hanging out the back. 1/12 pan cars are another source of inspiration that proves RWD can work very well on road. Maybe Tamiya will take another shot at it sometime.
I know others have complained about the M06 design, but I don't see it myself. I'm sure there are ways to simplify the design, but for the most part, having the motor behind the back axle, actually made for a decent handling car. The M04 was like driving the M06, but it had a mind of its own. Even when your within the perfect setup window, it can still step out, over rotate, or just plain go crazy on a whim. The M06 was well behaved in this regard. The issue I had with it came when trying for consistent super quick laptimes. There is one guy up here who can win consistently with the M06, but he also wins easily in Stock and Mod touring. Hes a damn robot.

For me, the downfall when running it on the edge, was the braking and corner entry. You needed the perfect amount of brake to get the corner entry, and this was so hard to find consistently. Adjust your line, and the car would swap ends. This didn't make it good for close racing IMHO. If you going to attempt a pass, you cant leave the fastest clean racing line, for fear the car will swap ends under braking, or loose the front on a dirty racing line. Now this is all due to the RWD, I don't feel its due to a design fault. But you really can lay down a quick lap every now and then. Get the braking right, and its a monster on carpet
axle182 is offline  
Old 07-20-2015, 07:48 AM
  #24878  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
sakadachi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 2,354
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by niznai
Perhaps that alongside the Goose (which I also have) should have provided the template for a RWD platform but with the motor in front of the rear wheels rather than hanging out the back. 1/12 pan cars are another source of inspiration that proves RWD can work very well on road. Maybe Tamiya will take another shot at it sometime.
My M04 that's been sitting on the shelf has the motor in front of the rear axle. Thing is fun to drive when the rear tires hook up real well. Otherwise on most surfaces, I am driving slow and careful as if I'm driving on snow/ice. I thought the rear motor setup on the M06 would fix this problem... Guess it's only FWD and 4WD for me?
sakadachi is offline  
Old 07-20-2015, 07:49 AM
  #24879  
Tech Master
iTrader: (6)
 
kwkride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,171
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

I agree Axle, I love my M06R, it works great on the carpet track here in Omaha. I never even have to touch the setup. It works far better than my M03 that I converted to rear wheel drive.

kwkride is offline  
Old 07-20-2015, 07:56 AM
  #24880  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
sakadachi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 2,354
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by kwkride
I agree Axle, I love my M06R, it works great on the carpet track here in Omaha. I never even have to touch the setup. It works far better than my M03 that I converted to rear wheel drive.

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8246/8...f051e85b_c.jpg
Holy cow! Nice set up you go there!
sakadachi is offline  
Old 07-20-2015, 08:02 AM
  #24881  
Tech Master
iTrader: (6)
 
kwkride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,171
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by sakadachi
Holy cow! Nice set up you go there!
Thanks! It doesn't look near that pretty anymore after 2 1/2 years of racing it.
kwkride is offline  
Old 07-20-2015, 08:05 AM
  #24882  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
sakadachi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 2,354
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by kwkride
Thanks! It doesn't look near that pretty anymore after 2 1/2 years of racing it.
sakadachi is offline  
Old 07-20-2015, 08:48 AM
  #24883  
Tech Elite
 
niznai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: All over the place
Posts: 2,974
Default

Originally Posted by axle182
I know others have complained about the M06 design, but I don't see it myself. I'm sure there are ways to simplify the design, but for the most part, having the motor behind the back axle, actually made for a decent handling car. The M04 was like driving the M06, but it had a mind of its own. Even when your within the perfect setup window, it can still step out, over rotate, or just plain go crazy on a whim. The M06 was well behaved in this regard. The issue I had with it came when trying for consistent super quick laptimes. There is one guy up here who can win consistently with the M06, but he also wins easily in Stock and Mod touring. Hes a damn robot.

For me, the downfall when running it on the edge, was the braking and corner entry. You needed the perfect amount of brake to get the corner entry, and this was so hard to find consistently. Adjust your line, and the car would swap ends. This didn't make it good for close racing IMHO. If you going to attempt a pass, you cant leave the fastest clean racing line, for fear the car will swap ends under braking, or loose the front on a dirty racing line. Now this is all due to the RWD, I don't feel its due to a design fault. But you really can lay down a quick lap every now and then. Get the braking right, and its a monster on carpet
The rear end of the M06 is a maze of bits and pieces and a ton of screws, the middle is sacrificed to put the battery lengthwise, the front again overcomplicated.

M04 is too long.

Try an M02 and you'll see what I am talking about.
niznai is offline  
Old 07-20-2015, 08:53 AM
  #24884  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
32819toon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: North of England
Posts: 580
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

I want a 4wd Mini. I've had the TT01 conversion, the Xpress and the ABC aswell but have sold them. The only one I can see available now is the Tamiya M-Four and noticed some talking about it here. Is it any good and could I use it against FWD ones ?
32819toon is offline  
Old 07-20-2015, 09:06 AM
  #24885  
Dan
Tech Champion
iTrader: (75)
 
Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,327
Trader Rating: 75 (100%+)
Default

Don't get the Tamiya M-four, it was not really designed around normal 1/10 brushless motors and batteries. Get the Top Sabre 4wd mini instead.
Dan is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.