Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Tamiya TRF416 / TRF416WE / TRF416X >

Tamiya TRF416 / TRF416WE / TRF416X

Like Tree4Likes

Tamiya TRF416 / TRF416WE / TRF416X

Old 03-24-2009, 08:50 PM
  #4891  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: MI
Posts: 1,544
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Hebiki
what i would love to have is to have Kiyo Suzuki get on here..and explain some of the changes he does for Marc's car when Marc requests certain things... like if his car pushes mid corner.. or needs more entry steering.

that way we'll know what TRF's top mechanic does to get TRF drivers dialed in.
John St.Amant is offline  
Old 03-24-2009, 08:54 PM
  #4892  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (34)
 
CraigM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 7,009
Trader Rating: 34 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by JimmyMac
More angled links = Less Ackermann = tighter tracks/more steering = more off power steering.
More straight links = More Ackermann = flowing tracks/less steering = more on power steering.
Can someone stick their car on a setup station and confirm this? I would but my setup station doesn't do steering throw

Reason I ask is because I was reading the Paul Liemaux (however the hell he spells it) thread and he said more ackerman = more off power, less on power. So I added some spacers and then one of my mates remarked how little ackerman I was running

... so I'm thinking Jimmy is right in his cause/effect but not the definition maybe?

More angled links = More Ackermann = tighter tracks/more steering = more off power steering.
More straight links = Less Ackermann = flowing tracks/less steering = more on power steering

would like to validate that though...
CraigM is offline  
Old 03-25-2009, 12:41 AM
  #4893  
Tech Adept
 
sagejyoung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: United Kingdom and South Africa
Posts: 175
Default

i am unable to explain how it works but i would think that you would want more off power steering on tight tracks and hence you would adjust the ackerman accordingly.... i wait with interest for someone with more experience to validate the ackerman issue.....


also i would like to know of ackerman is more of a lateral adjustment? like when the links are more horizontally angled or if you can adjust ackerman via the vertical adjustment of the links..??? or both?

Last edited by sagejyoung; 03-25-2009 at 01:19 AM. Reason: futher question
sagejyoung is offline  
Old 03-25-2009, 02:56 AM
  #4894  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 286
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Ok, first the definition. The Ackerman angle is the difference in angle between the inside and outside front wheel during cornering. For simplicity think full steering lock.

The bigger the difference in angle, the bigger the Ackerman angle.

Knowing this it is easy for you to test yourself that:

More angled links = Less Ackermann
More straight links = More Ackermann

And that tells you exactly nothing about the actual effect. So let's first think about the basics. During cornering the inside wheels follows a tighter arc then the outside wheel. To prevent the inside wheel from scrubbing this means it needs to make a bigger angle then the outside wheel since a bigger angle means a tighter arc. This is where the Ackerman angle comes in.

The tighter the corner, the bigger the difference in angle needs to be between inside and outside wheels. I.e. the bigger the Ackerman angle. So normally you would run more Ackerman on tight tracks and less on large flowing tracks. In both cases you do that to minimise wheel scrubbing (efficiency, cornering speed) and as a result maximise steering.

Hope this makes a bit more sense.
tonyv is offline  
Old 03-25-2009, 05:07 AM
  #4895  
Tech Adept
 
sagejyoung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: United Kingdom and South Africa
Posts: 175
Thumbs up

thats a solid explanation thanks. what im asking is could the ackerman angle change depending on the angle of the links horizontally or vertically? so in relation to the ground ackerman changes buy the more angled to the front or back of the car the links are, and also how angled the links are from the ground to the sky (vertical)?
sagejyoung is offline  
Old 03-25-2009, 05:12 AM
  #4896  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: MI
Posts: 1,544
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by CraigM
Can someone stick their car on a setup station and confirm this? I would but my setup station doesn't do steering throw

Reason I ask is because I was reading the Paul Liemaux (however the hell he spells it) thread and he said more ackerman = more off power, less on power. So I added some spacers and then one of my mates remarked how little ackerman I was running

... so I'm thinking Jimmy is right in his cause/effect but not the definition maybe?

More angled links = More Ackermann = tighter tracks/more steering = more off power steering.
More straight links = Less Ackermann = flowing tracks/less steering = more on power steering

would like to validate that though...

Achermann does not effect on or off power... but slip angle and mid corner. If you want more on or off power you need to adjust caster or center shock.

Last edited by John St.Amant; 03-25-2009 at 06:11 AM.
John St.Amant is offline  
Old 03-25-2009, 05:59 AM
  #4897  
Tech Master
iTrader: (34)
 
veecee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,454
Trader Rating: 34 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by John St.Amant
Achermann does not effecy on or off power... but slip angle and mid corner. If you want more on or off power you need to adjust caster or center shock.
So does more Ackermann give more or less mid corner steering?
veecee is offline  
Old 03-25-2009, 06:12 AM
  #4898  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: MI
Posts: 1,544
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by veecee
So does more Ackermann give more or less mid corner steering?
More Achermann means more mid corner... yes its measured at full lock too.
John St.Amant is offline  
Old 03-25-2009, 07:28 AM
  #4899  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
JimmyMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NC
Posts: 4,447
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

I guess it depends which chassis you apply this too. I know the more angled the steering links are, the more steering you get for tighter corners. This applies to both my 416 and my XRay. My quotes were from XRay manual/setup guide. But you can apply this to most chassis out there.
JimmyMac is offline  
Old 03-25-2009, 07:57 AM
  #4900  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
 
TryHard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 5,386
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Bear in mind that the links angle differently on the Xray compared to the Tam... I.e. moving it forward on the inner piviot on the Xray gives more of a link angle, moving it back less.

Adding more angle to the link is effectively the same as shortening at full lock. So adding more angle to them does two things... reduces the steering angle of the outer wheel, and increases the angle of the inner wheel. So putting more angle on the links (losing spacers on the Tam), will give a bigger Ackerman angle. Good guide to what ackerman does is here

http://www.rc-truckncar-tuning.com/ackerman.html

Ackerman is strictly a lateral change, if you change the ball studs in hieght, your adjusting the bump steer characteristics, i.e. how much the steering turns under suspension compression.

HiH
Ed
TryHard is offline  
Old 03-25-2009, 08:13 AM
  #4901  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 286
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by John St.Amant
More Achermann means more mid corner... yes its measured at full lock too.
Actually, that depends. In flowing corners increasing Ackerman would in fact decrease mid corner steering as the inside wheel will lose grip and start dragging. Either one of two things will occur at this point. Either the car will get understeer or it will snap oversteer due to the dragging inside wheel. In either case you lose momentum.

In tight corners on the other hand increasing the Ackerman will increase mid corner steering.
tonyv is offline  
Old 03-25-2009, 08:20 AM
  #4902  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (12)
 
RC MARKET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: HK
Posts: 6,279
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

weekend back in stock
Attached Thumbnails Tamiya TRF416 / TRF416WE / TRF416X-ta-9804388.jpg  
RC MARKET is offline  
Old 03-25-2009, 09:52 AM
  #4903  
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,326
Default

Originally Posted by tonyv
Actually, that depends. In flowing corners increasing Ackerman would in fact decrease mid corner steering as the inside wheel will lose grip and start dragging. Either one of two things will occur at this point. Either the car will get understeer or it will snap oversteer due to the dragging inside wheel. In either case you lose momentum.

In tight corners on the other hand increasing the Ackerman will increase mid corner steering.
wouldn't a spool make this worse since it will drag the fronts no matter what?
redbones is offline  
Old 03-25-2009, 11:54 AM
  #4904  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: MI
Posts: 1,544
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by redbones
wouldn't a spool make this worse since it will drag the fronts no matter what?
Dont go confusing the subject..
But if you think about it.... A spool pushes mid corner and more Achermann will help that . And the inside tire never diffs out. But excess yaw angle makes for inefficient turning and yes it scrubs of loads of speed.
John St.Amant is offline  
Old 03-25-2009, 01:58 PM
  #4905  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 286
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by redbones
wouldn't a spool make this worse since it will drag the fronts no matter what?
For the principle it makes no difference whatsoever. The only thing that may change is that the amount of Ackerman that is optimal for a given track will change. In fact several aspects of your setup may need updating due to the fact that the spool, as John indicates, will push off power compared to a front one-way. Depending on what you changed you may feel a bigger or possibly even a smaller Ackerman angle is needed compared to a one-way on the same track.

To put things in perspective, in one race I ran a one-way and spool setup back to back. With the one-way setup I managed to have the car understeer. Something that is quite difficult to achieve with rubber tyres on carpet in mod. With the spool I managed to get the car to turn in much better even with a touch of mid-corner oversteer. The latter possibly could have been solved by running a touch less Ackerman.
tonyv is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.