Lap times vs. weight of car
#1

Has anyone experimented with lap times vs. reducing the weight of your car?
I know reducing rotational weight is more critical than reducing static weight.
For example, if you reduced the weight of the drive train by 10g, 20g, ect, how much (if any) did your lap times change?
I know reducing rotational weight is more critical than reducing static weight.
For example, if you reduced the weight of the drive train by 10g, 20g, ect, how much (if any) did your lap times change?
#2

seaball.....would you like to feild this one?
"3300's are so much faster than 4200's!"
"Im runnin 33's till I Die...."
"3300's are so much faster than 4200's!"
"Im runnin 33's till I Die...."
#4
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (5)

that why they have a min weight rule at most clubs.
I do have different veiw on this subject. if the track is very flowing. what is in motion stay in motion. so if you and can flow around the track with very little breaking( what i have breaks
). a slightly heavier car might be faster as it doesn't have to accellerate has much. As it stay in motion easier. but if the track if full 180 and you have to break tons. a lighter car would be more benificail( Man I can spell today. but you get the jist of it)
I know when I finally got my car up to proper weight requirements I was doing fast lap times. Heck maybe I finally learned how to drive
. I also found out I was over weight too. by 25gm.
I do have different veiw on this subject. if the track is very flowing. what is in motion stay in motion. so if you and can flow around the track with very little breaking( what i have breaks


I know when I finally got my car up to proper weight requirements I was doing fast lap times. Heck maybe I finally learned how to drive

#5

I know most clubs have a weight limit, but is isn't always enforced. I guess no one did any testing to find out this information.
#6

Has anyone experimented with lap times vs. reducing the weight of your car?
I know reducing rotational weight is more critical than reducing static weight.
For example, if you reduced the weight of the drive train by 10g, 20g, ect, how much (if any) did your lap times change?
I know reducing rotational weight is more critical than reducing static weight.
For example, if you reduced the weight of the drive train by 10g, 20g, ect, how much (if any) did your lap times change?
#7

Last year at the KO Propo race, the minimum weight was 1525 grams. This year at the Reedy Race the minimum for 6 cell was 1525 grams, and 1450 for 5 cell. I try to keep my car at 1525 minimun and work with that. Reedy race cars with 5 cell didn't seem to have the same zip as 6 cell cars but were putting in the same lap times. I would guess having less weight to carry makes the car take turns easier.
#8

Thanks for the info. I don't race any large events so I don't worry about what roar says. I don't feel like racing every 6 hrs.
#9

that why they have a min weight rule at most clubs.
I do have different veiw on this subject. if the track is very flowing. what is in motion stay in motion. so if you and can flow around the track with very little breaking( what i have breaks
). a slightly heavier car might be faster as it doesn't have to accellerate has much. As it stay in motion easier. but if the track if full 180 and you have to break tons. a lighter car would be more benificail( Man I can spell today. but you get the jist of it)
I know when I finally got my car up to proper weight requirements I was doing fast lap times. Heck maybe I finally learned how to drive
. I also found out I was over weight too. by 25gm.
I do have different veiw on this subject. if the track is very flowing. what is in motion stay in motion. so if you and can flow around the track with very little breaking( what i have breaks


I know when I finally got my car up to proper weight requirements I was doing fast lap times. Heck maybe I finally learned how to drive

Well the unbalanced force here is gravity, and a heavier car will be more affected by gravity. I'm no scientist but it seems like a lighter car would be better.
#10

I think that's generally going to be true, but when you make a car lighter than the intended/designed weight, lots of other things need to be adjusted to compensate. Spring and damper rates, inserts, tires...lots of stuff.
It would definitely be faster, "apples to apples" no way around that...but it may take some work to get there, setup-wise.
It would definitely be faster, "apples to apples" no way around that...but it may take some work to get there, setup-wise.
#11
Tech Rookie

that why they have a min weight rule at most clubs.
I do have different veiw on this subject. if the track is very flowing. what is in motion stay in motion. so if you and can flow around the track with very little breaking( what i have breaks
). a slightly heavier car might be faster as it doesn't have to accellerate has much. As it stay in motion easier. but if the track if full 180 and you have to break tons. a lighter car would be more benificail( Man I can spell today. but you get the jist of it)
I know when I finally got my car up to proper weight requirements I was doing fast lap times. Heck maybe I finally learned how to drive
. I also found out I was over weight too. by 25gm.
I do have different veiw on this subject. if the track is very flowing. what is in motion stay in motion. so if you and can flow around the track with very little breaking( what i have breaks


I know when I finally got my car up to proper weight requirements I was doing fast lap times. Heck maybe I finally learned how to drive


#12
Tech Rookie

The less inertia the better. Inertia stores energy when accelerating, that will go into heat when braking.
#13

Has anyone experimented with lap times vs. reducing the weight of your car?
I know reducing rotational weight is more critical than reducing static weight.
For example, if you reduced the weight of the drive train by 10g, 20g, ect, how much (if any) did your lap times change?
I know reducing rotational weight is more critical than reducing static weight.
For example, if you reduced the weight of the drive train by 10g, 20g, ect, how much (if any) did your lap times change?
#14

This depends on the track and race conditions. In the oval racing that I do, the minimum weight is 42oz. At the short tracks I try to be as close to that as possible. On the velodrome tracks I give up some weight to add aerodynamics, high-speed caps, and durability. Last time I think the car weighed in close to 47oz. The cars with the smooth chassis that seals with the body are quicker through the air. This is an extreme example ... corner speed is almost the same at straightaway speed so the rotational weight and the static weight aren't a concern as much as aerodynamic drag. We also run large front bumpers - it is better to survive a wreck and keep racing than to gain .05 seconds per lap and not finish a race.
#15

Thanks for all the info. If I want to take .1 sec of my lap time; and the only thing I change is the weight of the car, I should remove _____ grams from the car. If no one has any hard data, educated guesses would be welcome.