ROAR Brushless construction rules - where?
#1

I want to see the ROAR construction rules for brushless motors that everyone claims their motors meet.
However I cannot find mention of them anywhere on the ROAR website (www.roarracing.org), only brushed specs.
Are they published anywhere online? Or can someone cut and paste them here?
Thanks.
However I cannot find mention of them anywhere on the ROAR website (www.roarracing.org), only brushed specs.
Are they published anywhere online? Or can someone cut and paste them here?
Thanks.
#3

Thanks for that, had already scanned through that section but totally missed them!
#4

A question for the techies now...
To make the fastest possible motor for a given wind, would the brushed theory of a short stack/stator (ie less wire) be the way to do it - ie. wound around a 19.3mm stator.
And as far as rotor diameter, would a larger diameter rotor give more power due to the increased magnetic material, but maybe also less rip due to the greater weight and inertia?
To make the fastest possible motor for a given wind, would the brushed theory of a short stack/stator (ie less wire) be the way to do it - ie. wound around a 19.3mm stator.
And as far as rotor diameter, would a larger diameter rotor give more power due to the increased magnetic material, but maybe also less rip due to the greater weight and inertia?
#5

Originally Posted by sosidge
A question for the techies now...
To make the fastest possible motor for a given wind, would the brushed theory of a short stack/stator (ie less wire) be the way to do it - ie. wound around a 19.3mm stator.
And as far as rotor diameter, would a larger diameter rotor give more power due to the increased magnetic material, but maybe also less rip due to the greater weight and inertia?
To make the fastest possible motor for a given wind, would the brushed theory of a short stack/stator (ie less wire) be the way to do it - ie. wound around a 19.3mm stator.
And as far as rotor diameter, would a larger diameter rotor give more power due to the increased magnetic material, but maybe also less rip due to the greater weight and inertia?
