Tamiya TA05MS
#781

I just finished transforming my 934 kit into a TA05MS. All that I needed was the top and bottom decks and the longer front MS belt!
I kept the short arms that came with the 934. I'm hoping that by using the rest of the stock MS settings as a starting point, the car won't be too twitchy like mentioned above. I know it's going to transition wieght better side-to-side.
I'll see how it drives compared to my Kawada/Penguin chassis TA05R that has been so solid all summer for me. By the winter racing season, I should have this car dialed! Then next year maybe I'll be in a 416
Any set-yp tips for the short suspension arms would be greatly appreciated.
FYI:
13.5 BL / LiPo
CS27 / RP30
4.5 FD
medium-sized asphalt
Thanks
I kept the short arms that came with the 934. I'm hoping that by using the rest of the stock MS settings as a starting point, the car won't be too twitchy like mentioned above. I know it's going to transition wieght better side-to-side.
I'll see how it drives compared to my Kawada/Penguin chassis TA05R that has been so solid all summer for me. By the winter racing season, I should have this car dialed! Then next year maybe I'll be in a 416

Any set-yp tips for the short suspension arms would be greatly appreciated.
FYI:
13.5 BL / LiPo
CS27 / RP30
4.5 FD
medium-sized asphalt
Thanks
#782

I've never tried those short arms before, so I too was wondering how it affects handling.
I think you won't have a problem with the car being too "twitchy", though. This car is extremely stable, but capable of turning on a dime when needed. redbones had to use 2 degree caster blocks, less rear toe in, a higher rear roll center, and more front inboard sweep to achieve the agility he desires.
I think you won't have a problem with the car being too "twitchy", though. This car is extremely stable, but capable of turning on a dime when needed. redbones had to use 2 degree caster blocks, less rear toe in, a higher rear roll center, and more front inboard sweep to achieve the agility he desires.
#783

I just finished transforming my 934 kit into a TA05MS. All that I needed was the top and bottom decks and the longer front MS belt!
I kept the short arms that came with the 934. I'm hoping that by using the rest of the stock MS settings as a starting point, the car won't be too twitchy like mentioned above. I know it's going to transition wieght better side-to-side.
I'll see how it drives compared to my Kawada/Penguin chassis TA05R that has been so solid all summer for me. By the winter racing season, I should have this car dialed! Then next year maybe I'll be in a 416
Any set-yp tips for the short suspension arms would be greatly appreciated.
FYI:
13.5 BL / LiPo
CS27 / RP30
4.5 FD
medium-sized asphalt
Thanks
I kept the short arms that came with the 934. I'm hoping that by using the rest of the stock MS settings as a starting point, the car won't be too twitchy like mentioned above. I know it's going to transition wieght better side-to-side.
I'll see how it drives compared to my Kawada/Penguin chassis TA05R that has been so solid all summer for me. By the winter racing season, I should have this car dialed! Then next year maybe I'll be in a 416

Any set-yp tips for the short suspension arms would be greatly appreciated.
FYI:
13.5 BL / LiPo
CS27 / RP30
4.5 FD
medium-sized asphalt
Thanks
when i run the normal length LW arms. i run B/A suspension blocks up front with XB/D in the rear (3 deg of rear toe with 0 deg hubs.)
with the short arms, i recommend you run D/D up front with X/E in the rear. you'll have the same track width, but you'll notice the car transitions faster with the shorter EvoV arms.

ive also ran the EvoV arms with the B/A, XB/D suspension blocks then added 1mm spacers on the hubs. i couldnt tell those if there was a difference btw this set up, and the D/D, X/E set up.
- chris
#784

quattro....
when i run the normal length LW arms. i run B/A suspension blocks up front with XB/D in the rear (3 deg of rear toe with 0 deg hubs.)
with the short arms, i recommend you run D/D up front with X/E in the rear. you'll have the same track width, but you'll notice the car transitions faster with the shorter EvoV arms.
ive also ran the EvoV arms with the B/A, XB/D suspension blocks then added 1mm spacers on the hubs. i couldnt tell those if there was a difference btw this set up, and the D/D, X/E set up.
- chris
when i run the normal length LW arms. i run B/A suspension blocks up front with XB/D in the rear (3 deg of rear toe with 0 deg hubs.)
with the short arms, i recommend you run D/D up front with X/E in the rear. you'll have the same track width, but you'll notice the car transitions faster with the shorter EvoV arms.

ive also ran the EvoV arms with the B/A, XB/D suspension blocks then added 1mm spacers on the hubs. i couldnt tell those if there was a difference btw this set up, and the D/D, X/E set up.
- chris
I didn't realize the point was to remain at the same overall track width. Now that I know, I feel a little better about this set-up. The way I have it now the car is too narrow so I'll try the D/D - X/E configuration you run.
Cheers!
#788
#789
Tech Addict
iTrader: (4)

http://www.rctech.net/forum/showpost...&postcount=718
I've needed to make an small mod to the bearing holders, to make everything fit, check that post....
cheers,
al
#794
Tech Adept

Nothing special. Some of the 17t carpet racing and i alredy won one club race and one big race i managed a-main 6th.
I just joy my MS ride.

#795

Is the TA05 line the replacement for the TB line?