protoform mazda6 vs speed6
#2

Hey Jamie.. I have only on the rug with rubber tires. I did notice the speed body a lot more aggressive on entry and mid corner while the 6 a lot more smooth all around with still good turn in. A great body to try is the Parma M body also,great ballance with awsome high speed turn in without loosing the rear.. 
So Speed lot less forgiving and more twitchy.. Mazda 6 more smooth..Parma M great turn in and smooth feel..

So Speed lot less forgiving and more twitchy.. Mazda 6 more smooth..Parma M great turn in and smooth feel..
#3
Tech Master
iTrader: (30)

i have 2 mazda 6's and 1 mazda speed 6....i use them both on my xxx-s i switch them around...i personally cant tell a diffrence between the 2....i run outdoor asphalt rubber tires 19t....maybe im not fast enough or not enough traction to notice a big diffrence either way youll be satisfied with any of the 6's
#4

i have tested both bodies now for about 2 months.
my result:
speed 6 more forgiving, little less steering, a bit more unprecise
m6 more steering, more precise
m6 ligthweight balance like m6 but a bit easier, less roll, my most favourit at the moment
my result:
speed 6 more forgiving, little less steering, a bit more unprecise
m6 more steering, more precise
m6 ligthweight balance like m6 but a bit easier, less roll, my most favourit at the moment
#5

car was a yok bdm by the way with a 5cell gm brushless modified combo. 3,5T most of the time.
#6

I've run them both. The Speed 6 body does have more front d/f
than the old 6. I found that moving the wing back one or two notches
adjusted the balance nicely--even with cutting on the smaller lines.
Plus, use the cut outs, they increase the wing's effectiveness.
I've noticed the same w/ the DNA2
Rule of thumb: Small/technical track= wing forward, longer/flowing track= wing back
With these adjs, the bodies have way more overall "stick" than the std 6 or DNA.
...OR, if you're club racing, you could run the old 6 wing full size with the spill plates and above adjs...
Hope this helps!
than the old 6. I found that moving the wing back one or two notches
adjusted the balance nicely--even with cutting on the smaller lines.
Plus, use the cut outs, they increase the wing's effectiveness.
I've noticed the same w/ the DNA2
Rule of thumb: Small/technical track= wing forward, longer/flowing track= wing back
With these adjs, the bodies have way more overall "stick" than the std 6 or DNA.
...OR, if you're club racing, you could run the old 6 wing full size with the spill plates and above adjs...
Hope this helps!
#7

i maybe have to add that i used the new pf hd wings on both bodies, as far back as possible
#8

There is a lot to be said for personal pref/driving styles...maybe the most
important factor (considering "proven bodies").
One additional thing to play with is mounting the body a little fore or aft..
The lip on the front of the Speed 6 is much longer and the grill is more abrupt, too--as well as the rear deck length...
This, in combo with the angle of the body, are significant...
important factor (considering "proven bodies").
One additional thing to play with is mounting the body a little fore or aft..
The lip on the front of the Speed 6 is much longer and the grill is more abrupt, too--as well as the rear deck length...
This, in combo with the angle of the body, are significant...
#9

Originally Posted by Martin Hofer
i have tested both bodies now for about 2 months.
my result:
speed 6 more forgiving, little less steering, a bit more unprecise
m6 more steering, more precise
m6 ligthweight balance like m6 but a bit easier, less roll, my most favourit at the moment
my result:
speed 6 more forgiving, little less steering, a bit more unprecise
m6 more steering, more precise
m6 ligthweight balance like m6 but a bit easier, less roll, my most favourit at the moment
#10

Originally Posted by Martin Hofer
car was a yok bdm by the way with a 5cell gm brushless modified combo. 3,5T most of the time.