Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
protoform mazda6 vs speed6 >

protoform mazda6 vs speed6

protoform mazda6 vs speed6

Old 03-31-2007, 01:56 PM
  #1  
Tech Elite
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
J.Gonzalez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: connecticut
Posts: 2,445
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default protoform mazda6 vs speed6

Anyone run both bodies back to back? Any handling differences?

I have to pickup some bodies for the upcoming outdoor season I figure you warm weather guys must have some input.

Thanks

Jamie
J.Gonzalez is offline  
Old 03-31-2007, 02:01 PM
  #2  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (42)
 
John Tag's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Huntersville, NC
Posts: 8,925
Trader Rating: 42 (100%+)
Default

Hey Jamie.. I have only on the rug with rubber tires. I did notice the speed body a lot more aggressive on entry and mid corner while the 6 a lot more smooth all around with still good turn in. A great body to try is the Parma M body also,great ballance with awsome high speed turn in without loosing the rear..

So Speed lot less forgiving and more twitchy.. Mazda 6 more smooth..Parma M great turn in and smooth feel..
John Tag is offline  
Old 03-31-2007, 02:30 PM
  #3  
Tech Master
iTrader: (30)
 
PoLsKiE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 1,256
Trader Rating: 30 (100%+)
Default

i have 2 mazda 6's and 1 mazda speed 6....i use them both on my xxx-s i switch them around...i personally cant tell a diffrence between the 2....i run outdoor asphalt rubber tires 19t....maybe im not fast enough or not enough traction to notice a big diffrence either way youll be satisfied with any of the 6's
PoLsKiE is offline  
Old 03-31-2007, 03:04 PM
  #4  
Tech Master
 
Martin Hofer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,083
Default

i have tested both bodies now for about 2 months.

my result:

speed 6 more forgiving, little less steering, a bit more unprecise

m6 more steering, more precise

m6 ligthweight balance like m6 but a bit easier, less roll, my most favourit at the moment
Martin Hofer is offline  
Old 03-31-2007, 03:05 PM
  #5  
Tech Master
 
Martin Hofer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,083
Default

car was a yok bdm by the way with a 5cell gm brushless modified combo. 3,5T most of the time.
Martin Hofer is offline  
Old 03-31-2007, 03:09 PM
  #6  
Tech Master
iTrader: (96)
 
DIALED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,692
Trader Rating: 96 (100%+)
Default

I've run them both. The Speed 6 body does have more front d/f
than the old 6. I found that moving the wing back one or two notches
adjusted the balance nicely--even with cutting on the smaller lines.
Plus, use the cut outs, they increase the wing's effectiveness.
I've noticed the same w/ the DNA2

Rule of thumb: Small/technical track= wing forward, longer/flowing track= wing back

With these adjs, the bodies have way more overall "stick" than the std 6 or DNA.

...OR, if you're club racing, you could run the old 6 wing full size with the spill plates and above adjs...

Hope this helps!
DIALED is offline  
Old 03-31-2007, 03:12 PM
  #7  
Tech Master
 
Martin Hofer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,083
Default

i maybe have to add that i used the new pf hd wings on both bodies, as far back as possible
Martin Hofer is offline  
Old 03-31-2007, 03:23 PM
  #8  
Tech Master
iTrader: (96)
 
DIALED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,692
Trader Rating: 96 (100%+)
Default

There is a lot to be said for personal pref/driving styles...maybe the most
important factor (considering "proven bodies").

One additional thing to play with is mounting the body a little fore or aft..
The lip on the front of the Speed 6 is much longer and the grill is more abrupt, too--as well as the rear deck length...
This, in combo with the angle of the body, are significant...
DIALED is offline  
Old 03-31-2007, 03:48 PM
  #9  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (12)
 
RC MARKET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: HK
Posts: 6,287
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Martin Hofer
i have tested both bodies now for about 2 months.

my result:

speed 6 more forgiving, little less steering, a bit more unprecise

m6 more steering, more precise

m6 ligthweight balance like m6 but a bit easier, less roll, my most favourit at the moment
Yes me too !
RC MARKET is offline  
Old 03-31-2007, 03:48 PM
  #10  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (12)
 
RC MARKET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: HK
Posts: 6,287
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Martin Hofer
car was a yok bdm by the way with a 5cell gm brushless modified combo. 3,5T most of the time.
use which gear ratio ?
RC MARKET is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.