Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Offical Mi3 Photos >

Offical Mi3 Photos

Offical Mi3 Photos

Old 01-30-2007, 04:51 PM
  #121  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (217)
 
Marcos.J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Semper Fi
Posts: 31,207
Trader Rating: 217 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by rcnewb2004
one more small question (due to my poor understanding of mechanics),

how do you change the shock angles on this car?

hehe waiting for pics with the anti-roll bars on it too!

Thanks for the explanations!
look at the pictures there are a few mounting holes on the towers
Marcos.J is offline  
Old 01-30-2007, 04:58 PM
  #122  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
OSherman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: o0O In the FishBowl O0o
Posts: 3,499
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Alex Lopez
By looking at the pictures of the MI3, can you be serious to ask those questions. This car was built from the ground up by Schumacher and iin no way, shape, or form resembles an MI2 EC. The only that are transferable to the new kit from the MI2 EC are:

Steering block
castor blocks
Arms( New arms will have new holes for sway bars, so old arms might be useless)
ball cups
turnbuckles
shocks
springs
diffs( But like Pw stated earlier, the new MI3 diff will have locked rings which will allow you to run a looser diff without it slipping).
I think you mis-understood his question..
OSherman is offline  
Old 01-30-2007, 05:03 PM
  #123  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (39)
 
A Ilievski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: A.C.T (Australia)
Posts: 2,717
Trader Rating: 39 (100%+)
Default

Will the diff mounts and motor mount be anodised purple? It already looks sweet as is
A Ilievski is offline  
Old 01-30-2007, 05:07 PM
  #124  
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 34
Default

Originally Posted by Alex Lopez
By looking at the pictures of the MI3, can you be serious to ask those questions. This car was built from the ground up by Schumacher and iin no way, shape, or form resembles an MI2 EC. The only that are transferable to the new kit from the MI2 EC are:

Steering block
castor blocks
Arms( New arms will have new holes for sway bars, so old arms might be useless)
ball cups
turnbuckles
shocks
springs
diffs( But like Pw stated earlier, the new MI3 diff will have locked rings which will allow you to run a looser diff without it slipping).

I think you didnīt get my point Alex. I can very clearly see the obvious changes on the car, like lower CG, different parts used and so on....

I was asking about other major changes on the geometry like narrower wheelbase, different angles of shock position compared to the EC, difference in weight distribution left-right, front-rear and so on..., battery moved foreward or backward compared to the EC.....

Just the changes which one cannot figure out from the pics only.

Maybe you get it right this time............
joamu is offline  
Old 01-30-2007, 05:08 PM
  #125  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (13)
 
protc3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Spring Hill,Florida
Posts: 10,867
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

from speaking with paul and adrian it is quite different.
protc3 is offline  
Old 01-30-2007, 05:12 PM
  #126  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
 
AdrianM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,915
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by joamu
I think you didnīt get my point Alex. I can very clearly see the obvious changes on the car, like lower CG, different parts used and so on....

I was asking about other major changes on the geometry like narrower wheelbase, different angles of shock position compared to the EC, difference in weight distribution left-right, front-rear and so on..., battery moved foreward or backward compared to the EC.....

Just the changes which one cannot figure out from the pics only.

Maybe you get it right this time............
The wheelbase and battery position is the same as on the EC...it works very well.

The width of the car can be anything from 190mm until the the drive shafts bottom out in the drive cups arount 185mm.

As far as suspension geomerty the general dimensions of the lower arms are the same as on the EC but everything else (roll center, camber link angle and length, etc...) is unlimited.

The shock angle range is the same as on the EC (whick works quite well) but the towers have 1/2 holes in them so you have finer adjustments.

The Mi2EC is one of the best handling sedans available today. The Mi3 starts where the Mi2EC leaves off and has the capability to go even faster.
AdrianM is offline  
Old 01-30-2007, 05:14 PM
  #127  
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 34
Default

Originally Posted by AdrianM
The inner camber link blocks come off with one screw per side. Its really easy to change anything you want.

As far as suspension geomerty the general dimensions of the lower arms are the same as on the EC but everything else (roll center, camber link angle and length, etc...) is unlimited.

The shock angle range is the same as on the EC (whick works quite well) but the towers have 1/2 holes in them so you have finer adjustments.

The Mi2EC is one of the best handling sedans available today. The Mi3 starts where the Mi2EC leaves off and has the capability to go even faster.
This is the kind of answer I can appreciate, thanks Adrian
joamu is offline  
Old 01-30-2007, 05:16 PM
  #128  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
 
AdrianM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,915
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by joamu
This is the kind of answer I can appreciate, thanks Adrian
I edited my post to better answer your questions.
AdrianM is offline  
Old 01-30-2007, 05:27 PM
  #129  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
stuey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 393
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

it may look the part but i dont know about you guys when you look a the photos do youfeel you wanna stick a random piece of ally on your self it looks to me they have sifted through the pot of bits and come up with the mi3.

we shall have to wait and see if its any good when the average racers get hold of it.
stuey is offline  
Old 01-30-2007, 05:34 PM
  #130  
Tech Master
iTrader: (45)
 
Scott B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NOR-CAL
Posts: 1,287
Trader Rating: 45 (100%+)
Default

My only question is when will Jason "MO" Moberly be getting one so he can start racing again??
Scott B is online now  
Old 01-30-2007, 05:45 PM
  #131  
Tech Master
iTrader: (10)
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,131
Trader Rating: 10 (92%+)
Default

PW or Adrian: Hows the weight of the MI3? With or without electronics.

Looks like a solid car.
Johnny Carey is offline  
Old 01-30-2007, 05:45 PM
  #132  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: M-I-A
Posts: 591
Default

Originally Posted by joamu
I think you didnīt get my point Alex. I can very clearly see the obvious changes on the car, like lower CG, different parts used and so on....

I was asking about other major changes on the geometry like narrower wheelbase, different angles of shock position compared to the EC, difference in weight distribution left-right, front-rear and so on..., battery moved foreward or backward compared to the EC.....

Just the changes which one cannot figure out from the pics only.

Maybe you get it right this time............
Whoops!! Sorry about that man. I was doing hw and reading the thread at the same time. Not a very good idea. I edited my post and it shows an actual answer to your question. Sorry If i came off as an A$$.
Alex Lopez is offline  
Old 01-30-2007, 05:50 PM
  #133  
PW
Tech Elite
Thread Starter
 
PW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Groveland, FL
Posts: 4,576
Default

Originally Posted by stuey
it looks to me they have sifted through the pot of bits and come up with the mi3.
We can accept constructive criticism and doubts about handling, but that quote couldn't be further from the truth

Just to let everyone know...The arms in the photo are from the Mi2 and the Mi3 will have updated arms
PW is offline  
Old 01-30-2007, 05:50 PM
  #134  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (10)
 
Brian McGreevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,081
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by MR JOLLY
is it easier then it looks to get shims under the inner camber link loc for roll centre adjustment
or does it look diffulcult & fumbly like in the pic
To me, it looks like you detatch the purple aluminum camber link piece from the bulkhead (very easy to do), and change the shimming then.
Brian McGreevy is offline  
Old 01-30-2007, 05:58 PM
  #135  
PW
Tech Elite
Thread Starter
 
PW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Groveland, FL
Posts: 4,576
Default

The spacing for camber and track width is very straight forward and easy, but I will admit roll-center spacing is a little more fumbly
PW is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright Đ 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.