Who will be first?
#167
Tech Regular

Go Tigers!
#168
Tech Legend

iTrader: (51)
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Castle Mamba Max Pro. Feel its power!!!!!!!!!!
Posts: 21,220
Trader Rating: 51 (100%+)

Originally Posted by dawgmeat
true but that Marlins had a welfare roster
Hey even underdogs win sometimes. Hell not even Tiger Woods can win them all.
#170

Originally Posted by wyd
Very true but go back over the last 20 years. I would bet 17 of the last 20 years was won by teams with a top 5 payroll.
Hey even underdogs win sometimes. Hell not even Tiger Woods can win them all.
Hey even underdogs win sometimes. Hell not even Tiger Woods can win them all.
#171
Tech Legend

iTrader: (51)
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Castle Mamba Max Pro. Feel its power!!!!!!!!!!
Posts: 21,220
Trader Rating: 51 (100%+)

Originally Posted by dawgmeat
X-ray is the King of carpet but when the outdoors seasons begins the Yankees become TRF and Hotbodies
Yes Yankees might be the TRF and Hotbodies in outdoors.
#173

Originally Posted by Bobby Flack
WOW
I will say you dont see XRAY's team manager on here bashing other companys cars. I believe they let the results speak for themselves. Its funny to see Hodge, PW, and Adrian so bitter though. Why dont you guys do some work to try and catch up rather then just bash XRAY.
I will say you dont see XRAY's team manager on here bashing other companys cars. I believe they let the results speak for themselves. Its funny to see Hodge, PW, and Adrian so bitter though. Why dont you guys do some work to try and catch up rather then just bash XRAY.


Amazing how EA makes a funny about Xray and it's just that, but when I make a funny it's bashing

#174

Originally Posted by PW
Whooaa...Don't put me into this bashing stuff! EA "Xray" team driver was the first to make a joke about Xray coming out with new cars all the time; so I also made a joke about it...please note the
after my post!
Amazing how EA makes a funny about Xray and it's just that, but when I make a funny it's bashing


Amazing how EA makes a funny about Xray and it's just that, but when I make a funny it's bashing

http://www.rctech.net/forum/showpost...4&postcount=14
#175
Tech Regular

Originally Posted by PW
Whooaa...Don't put me into this bashing stuff! EA "Xray" team driver was the first to make a joke about Xray coming out with new cars all the time; so I also made a joke about it...please note the
after my post!
Amazing how EA makes a funny about Xray and it's just that, but when I make a funny it's bashing


Amazing how EA makes a funny about Xray and it's just that, but when I make a funny it's bashing

#176

Originally Posted by Marcos.J
Cardinals 


Later,

#177

Whew!!! I just read back three pages just to catch up for today.
Now my .02.
Every company continues to develop and improve their car. That's what they are supposed to do. At some point, you have to stop for a minute and release the car (Losi). You could continue to find new things that work better and spend eternity in development. Xray on the other hand, actually releases the car that they've developed but nothing they've done has been revolutionary.
Everyone says "looks like an Xray". When I think of "Xray", I think of the T1 chassis with 3/3 batts and the rear motor with that god awful 175 tooth spur gear stuck up in the air. Yokomo, Corally, Tamiya all come out with side mount, two belt cars and Xray follows. Yokomo releases easy access diffs and Xray follows. The T2 took the best of all worlds (yok diff access, Cyclone rear bulkheads, Corally low CG, Tamiya side mount motor) and produced what everyone was looking for. The T2 was supposed to be the car for all surfaces and they've proven themselves wrong and now release two seperate cars. Maybe they need to rethink their own engineering.
The TC5 prototype shows up with a long top deck and then Xray releases the '007 with a long top deck. Who's copying who?
I personnally can't wait to see the new Schumacher show up with the short top deck and see what happens.
I'm very happy with my T2 (thanks to the high quality parts and a lot of help from Jason at BMI), so I'm not trying to jump on the "trash Xray bandwagon". They've built a great team to support a great car. They may have even done themselves an injustice by allowing people to think that the car is only good because of the drivers they've hired. (Dumas didn't miss a beat after going to Losi.
Now back to the regularly scheduled thread:
1. MI3
2. Phi
3. TC5
4. Dawgmeat Edition Cyclone
5. Type R

Every company continues to develop and improve their car. That's what they are supposed to do. At some point, you have to stop for a minute and release the car (Losi). You could continue to find new things that work better and spend eternity in development. Xray on the other hand, actually releases the car that they've developed but nothing they've done has been revolutionary.
Everyone says "looks like an Xray". When I think of "Xray", I think of the T1 chassis with 3/3 batts and the rear motor with that god awful 175 tooth spur gear stuck up in the air. Yokomo, Corally, Tamiya all come out with side mount, two belt cars and Xray follows. Yokomo releases easy access diffs and Xray follows. The T2 took the best of all worlds (yok diff access, Cyclone rear bulkheads, Corally low CG, Tamiya side mount motor) and produced what everyone was looking for. The T2 was supposed to be the car for all surfaces and they've proven themselves wrong and now release two seperate cars. Maybe they need to rethink their own engineering.

The TC5 prototype shows up with a long top deck and then Xray releases the '007 with a long top deck. Who's copying who?
I personnally can't wait to see the new Schumacher show up with the short top deck and see what happens.

I'm very happy with my T2 (thanks to the high quality parts and a lot of help from Jason at BMI), so I'm not trying to jump on the "trash Xray bandwagon". They've built a great team to support a great car. They may have even done themselves an injustice by allowing people to think that the car is only good because of the drivers they've hired. (Dumas didn't miss a beat after going to Losi.

Now back to the regularly scheduled thread:
1. MI3
2. Phi
3. TC5
4. Dawgmeat Edition Cyclone
5. Type R
Last edited by stiltskin; 01-29-2007 at 05:27 PM.
#179

Originally Posted by Marcos.J
here is where it all began!
http://www.rctech.net/forum/showpost...4&postcount=14
http://www.rctech.net/forum/showpost...4&postcount=14
#180

Originally Posted by stiltskin
Whew!!! I just read back three pages just to catch up for today.
Now my .02.
Every company continues to develop and improve their car. That's what they are supposed to do. At some point, you have to stop for a minute and release the car (Losi). You could continue to find new things that work better and spend eternity in development. Xray on the other hand, actually releases the car that they've developed but nothing they've done has been revolutionary.
Everyone says "looks like an Xray". When I think of "Xray", I think of the T1 chassis with 3/3 batts and the rear motor with that god awful 175 tooth spur gear stuck up in the air. Yokomo, Corally, Tamiya all come out with side mount, two belt cars and Xray follows. Yokomo releases easy access diffs and Xray follows. The T2 took the best of all worlds (yok diff access, Cyclone rear bulkheads, Corally low CG, Tamiya side mount motor) and produced what everyone was looking for. The T2 was supposed to be the car for all surfaces and they've proven themselves wrong and now release two seperate cars. Maybe they need to rethink their own engineering.
The TC5 prototype shows up with a long top deck and then Xray releases the '007 with a long top deck. Who's copying who?
I personnally can't wait to see the new Schumacher show up with the short top deck and see what happens.
I'm very happy with my T2 (thanks to the high quality parts and a lot of help from Jason at BMI), so I'm not trying to jump on the "trash Xray bandwagon". They've built a great team to support a great car. They may have even done themselves an injustice by allowing people to think that the car is only good because of the drivers they've hired. (Dumas didn't miss a beat after going to Losi.
)
Now back to the regularly scheduled thread:
1. MI3
2. Phi
3. TC5
4. Dawgmeat Edition Cyclone
5. Type R

Every company continues to develop and improve their car. That's what they are supposed to do. At some point, you have to stop for a minute and release the car (Losi). You could continue to find new things that work better and spend eternity in development. Xray on the other hand, actually releases the car that they've developed but nothing they've done has been revolutionary.
Everyone says "looks like an Xray". When I think of "Xray", I think of the T1 chassis with 3/3 batts and the rear motor with that god awful 175 tooth spur gear stuck up in the air. Yokomo, Corally, Tamiya all come out with side mount, two belt cars and Xray follows. Yokomo releases easy access diffs and Xray follows. The T2 took the best of all worlds (yok diff access, Cyclone rear bulkheads, Corally low CG, Tamiya side mount motor) and produced what everyone was looking for. The T2 was supposed to be the car for all surfaces and they've proven themselves wrong and now release two seperate cars. Maybe they need to rethink their own engineering.

The TC5 prototype shows up with a long top deck and then Xray releases the '007 with a long top deck. Who's copying who?
I personnally can't wait to see the new Schumacher show up with the short top deck and see what happens.

I'm very happy with my T2 (thanks to the high quality parts and a lot of help from Jason at BMI), so I'm not trying to jump on the "trash Xray bandwagon". They've built a great team to support a great car. They may have even done themselves an injustice by allowing people to think that the car is only good because of the drivers they've hired. (Dumas didn't miss a beat after going to Losi.

Now back to the regularly scheduled thread:
1. MI3
2. Phi
3. TC5
4. Dawgmeat Edition Cyclone
5. Type R
very good post.cant forget that the T1 platform was a carbon copy of the Tamiya 414.that blew me away.
