Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
"Official" Speed Record 134.4mph >

"Official" Speed Record 134.4mph

"Official" Speed Record 134.4mph

Old 08-04-2006, 08:34 AM
  #1  
Tech Master
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
XrayFK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,463
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default "Official" Speed Record 134.4mph

"Given the aerodynamic forces at play and the power required to go from 134mph to 160mph (the power requirement goes up exponentially, not in direct proportion to speed), I'm afraid that if there is an error we may have a record that will be unapproachable even by the guy who set it! And so, the OFFICIAL record will be set at 134.4."
-PeterV RCCA

See the run:
http://www.racers-haven.com/videos/1...%20run-big.wmv
XrayFK is offline  
Old 08-04-2006, 08:39 AM
  #2  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
itchy b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: In My Man Cave
Posts: 4,144
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by XrayFK
"Given the aerodynamic forces at play and the power required to go from 134mph to 160mph (the power requirement goes up exponentially, not in direct proportion to speed), I'm afraid that if there is an error we may have a record that will be unapproachable even by the guy who set it! And so, the OFFICIAL record will be set at 134.4."
-PeterV RCCA

See the run:
http://www.racers-haven.com/videos/1...%20run-big.wmv
wow peter, that is bloody hooting along
would'nt like to be hit in the leg with that car
itchy b is offline  
Old 08-04-2006, 12:30 PM
  #3  
Tech Master
iTrader: (8)
 
PitNamedGordie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Highwood, IL
Posts: 1,789
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

YIKES! What kind of car was it??
PitNamedGordie is offline  
Old 08-04-2006, 01:02 PM
  #4  
Tech Regular
 
thecrow2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 451
Default

A Nitro TC3, converted to electric
thecrow2k is offline  
Old 08-04-2006, 03:19 PM
  #5  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
fatbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 812
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Love the sound the car is making.
fatbear is offline  
Old 08-04-2006, 04:45 PM
  #6  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
tbeardmore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: aka "Rock Star"...!
Posts: 879
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

eeeeeeeyyyyyyyooooowwwwww......!
tbeardmore is offline  
Old 08-04-2006, 05:26 PM
  #7  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (6)
 
lem2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: OC
Posts: 3,061
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default Wow!!

How many cells was it runing on? Could someone post pictures of the car or longer video?

Congratulations on that insane speedrun!!!
lem2 is offline  
Old 08-04-2006, 07:07 PM
  #8  
Moderator
iTrader: (8)
 
StephenSobottka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 3,267
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

I almost defecated myself...eegad!
StephenSobottka is offline  
Old 08-04-2006, 08:36 PM
  #9  
Tech Addict
 
That0neguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 551
Default

http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/niccas...cd.jpg&.src=ph
That0neguy is offline  
Old 08-04-2006, 11:46 PM
  #10  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (6)
 
Fred Hubbard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Inglewood, CA
Posts: 2,721
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by XrayFK
"Given the aerodynamic forces at play and the power required to go from 134mph to 160mph (the power requirement goes up exponentially, not in direct proportion to speed), I'm afraid that if there is an error we may have a record that will be unapproachable even by the guy who set it! And so, the OFFICIAL record will be set at 134.4."
-PeterV RCCA

See the run:
http://www.racers-haven.com/videos/1...%20run-big.wmv
This was the correct decision. Especially since the guy didn't want to attempt to reproduce the 160 run. And considering he was able to complete SEVERAL 130+ runs.
Fred Hubbard is offline  
Old 08-05-2006, 05:48 AM
  #11  
Tech Adept
 
jo90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 125
Default

It's a shame that this is not the official world record. Get guiness involved !!
jo90 is offline  
Old 08-05-2006, 08:21 AM
  #12  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (9)
 
Mr. Shookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Wilderness
Posts: 4,711
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

Well its a shame that he didn't get the 160mph as the record...
From what I heard, he was attempting a second pass and messed up the throtting up and it got squirly, bumped a wall, had a small break and well they have rules that you have to have a drivable car after your speed is recorded. Shame though.
160 is now the mark for next year. If you can't get your car near that mark you might as well stay home.

-Shookie <><
Mr. Shookie is offline  
Old 08-05-2006, 10:51 PM
  #13  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (9)
 
SWTour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Central Coast...CALIF.
Posts: 2,959
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

"Given the aerodynamic forces at play and the power required to go from 134mph to 160mph (the power requirement goes up exponentially, not in direct proportion to speed), I'm afraid that if there is an error we may have a record that will be unapproachable even by the guy who set it! And so, the OFFICIAL record will be set at 134.4."
-PeterV RCCA
I see a couple FLAWS in this thinking PeterV, and hopefully Nic will come on the help explain them.

"The aerodynamic forces and the power required" idea may be true, IF these 2 runs were both made with the same car. However, the less efficient 4wd NTC3 converted to Electric ran 134 mph correct? The 160 mph run was done with a much more powertrain efficient 2wd DIRECT DRIVE car. Probably 35 - 40 % more powertrain efficient than a multi-geared gear box, shaft driven 4wd car.

If the claim of the "RADAR" gun not being accurate is being used, then NONE of the times should be declared accurate and all the results should be NULL and VOID~ and a proper speed trap to measure Feet per Second should be used. Or..the 160 mph run should stand as clocked~
SWTour is offline  
Old 08-08-2006, 09:02 PM
  #14  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
TPhalen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 2,894
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

FYI. He had one 109mph pass, one 12xmph pass, and his 134.4mph pass....with the same car. I would give him the 134.4mph pass since he did, I guess, 'build up' to that speed.

The 160mph was with a different car....different setup. His 2nd pass to 'back it up' was only a 95ish mph pass. I really, really, really don't think he did 160mph....I saw both and it didn't look that much faster than his 134mph pass. Plus, he ran foam tires. I also don't think foams would hold up to 160mph speeds....

Now, don't get me wrong. 134.4 is an amazing speed. He came, with homework done and pencil sharpened, and laid it down! I have no problem saying he deserved this record....

Last edited by TPhalen; 08-09-2006 at 01:11 PM.
TPhalen is offline  
Old 08-09-2006, 04:00 AM
  #15  
Tech Rookie
 
CARPET ROCKET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: WISCONSIN
Posts: 8
Default

Looks ike the massive power, and less weight of the LIPO stuff is going to help re work all the old speed records.. I remeber when guys needed 20 cells to hit 100 mph... imagine 20 lipo cells.. or even 40.. motor meltdown..
CARPET ROCKET is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.