Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Xpress Arrow AT1 >

Xpress Arrow AT1

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree701Likes

Xpress Arrow AT1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-14-2022, 03:52 AM
  #421  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Czech republic
Posts: 464
Default

Originally Posted by gigaplex
Attempting a rudimentary drivetrain efficiency test, using a motor analyser.

At the RPM tested (21.5 motor geared at around 3.335, ballpark 18k RPM) the shaft car was shown to be more efficient.
FInally some proof that shaft drive is more efficient - atleast at low load.
Test with varying load would be more interesting, but it's impossible without specialised tools...
gigaplex likes this.
Papi is offline  
Old 08-14-2022, 04:50 AM
  #422  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Medina, Ohio
Posts: 1,839
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Papi
FInally some proof that shaft drive is more efficient - atleast at low load.
Test with varying load would be more interesting, but it's impossible without specialised tools...
Chassis dyno!
To add. Free rev amp draw is a single indication of efficiency. There is still drive train inertia. That is what does it take to accelerate the drive train from zero. Both are very important to performance. I am a retired mechanical engineer. I designed drive trains on manufacturing equipment and in some cases we were looking for those numbers and design got interesting. Most of the time just give it enough HP to turn it fast enough.
gigaplex likes this.

Last edited by old_dude; 08-15-2022 at 04:42 AM.
old_dude is offline  
Old 08-14-2022, 03:06 PM
  #423  
Tech Initiate
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 20
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

I ran a similar test to Gigaplex but with standard and low loss (white) belts in my Xray T4 with a 21.5T Reedy S Plus motor. I can't remember the figures but the white belts gave a better result than the standard belts. It would be interesting if someone could compare the white belts to the Arrow AT1.
NZDave is offline  
Old 08-14-2022, 05:24 PM
  #424  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (239)
 
Marcos.J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Semper Fi
Posts: 32,994
Trader Rating: 239 (100%+)
Default


Hmm interesting
Horatio, dawgmeat, gwhiz and 3 others like this.
Marcos.J is offline  
Old 08-14-2022, 05:25 PM
  #425  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (32)
 
STLNLST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 9,940
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Marcos.J

Hmm interesting
😱😱😱
Marcos.J likes this.
STLNLST is offline  
Old 08-14-2022, 07:31 PM
  #426  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 733
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Well I got its virgin run in the books and Im gonna be honest, it didnt start out so well but by the end of the day I was very impressed.

I started with basically a kit setup.
7k in the diff - 400cst in the shocks - mugen 7p front and 6.5p rear springs (its all i had)
Every round was changes .... by the end of the day I ended up with this to make it work with minimal time between 2 classes.

The car def pushed on exit and power - not may driving so I swapped springs front to rear. Figured let it stand on the harder spring a bit more with exit.
I went to the 40mm rear camber plate and 38mm front camber plate. It helped a lot doing both of those things.

I put 1.2 bars on it front and rear instead of the kit 1.3 to let it roll more and that seemed to free it up quite a bit for me.
I also went to .5mm above each hub instead of raising the inner ball - quicker and easier then pulling the camber plates.
I did the front first and noticed I had better bite on exit on power and the rear got a little loose so I copied to the rear.

The big swing I didnt have time for and hate doing is playing with the pills.
I was center dot kit and think .5 down or even 1 down would have been very favorable. Ill try that next time.

I took some pretty good hits during the day too and broke nothing. Their kit plastics are pretty top line for their arms and hubs Ill say.

By the end of my day I had gotten the car after about a dozen runs down to the same lap times as my Mi8 on the same layout.
My personal opinion is dont give up out of the gate with this car. Work the track time with it, its gonna be great for its price and the stock classes.
I cant speak for mod just because I dont run it but I think the right driver and setup this car will surprise people.

One thing I did notice and forgot from the shaft days .... I had to increase my drag brake.
Im old school and favor using it but this car just wanted to roll when I lifted.
Hammer that throttle though and if you have traction it just gos.
I didnt notice anything weird with the torque, def not like the old shafties and mod motors.


Last edited by Robbob; 08-15-2022 at 06:04 AM.
Robbob is offline  
Old 08-14-2022, 09:59 PM
  #427  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 7,762
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Nice way to test efficiency with the motolyser...
Horatio likes this.
bertrandsv87 is offline  
Old 08-15-2022, 03:03 AM
  #428  
h2e
Tech Fanatic
 
h2e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 868
Default

Originally Posted by STLNLST
😱😱😱
Love to see these "best of" remixes!
h2e is offline  
Old 08-15-2022, 08:46 AM
  #429  
Bar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 626
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Papi
FInally some proof that shaft drive is more efficient - atleast at low load.
Test with varying load would be more interesting, but it's impossible without specialised tools...
That was the reason we nearly all used to run shaft cars back before lipo and brushless tech took over.
Bar is offline  
Old 08-15-2022, 10:14 AM
  #430  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
chinamonkey7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: F.L.
Posts: 671
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

After some initial testing, having the optional camber plate such as 40 or 38 for sure beneficial to the chassis handling.
chinamonkey7 is offline  
Old 08-15-2022, 10:27 AM
  #431  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 733
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by chinamonkey7
After some initial testing, having the optional camber plate such as 40 or 38 for sure beneficial to the chassis handling.
I used the ones that Krazed Builds makes, def helped with the car.

Marcos.J likes this.
Robbob is offline  
Old 08-15-2022, 10:33 AM
  #432  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (239)
 
Marcos.J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Semper Fi
Posts: 32,994
Trader Rating: 239 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Robbob
I used the ones that Krazed Builds makes, def helped with the car.
https://www.krazedbuilds.com/shop/at1?fs=e&s=cl
Robbob likes this.
Marcos.J is offline  
Old 08-16-2022, 01:01 AM
  #433  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: Geneva
Posts: 54
Default

Originally Posted by Robbob
I used the ones that Krazed Builds makes, def helped with the car.
Could you all describe how the camber plates have been helping? How have you used them to get what benefit? Thanks!
busman likes this.
4k4m3 is offline  
Old 08-16-2022, 09:53 AM
  #434  
OVA
Tech Lord
iTrader: (86)
 
OVA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: WASHINGTON
Posts: 10,305
Trader Rating: 86 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by 4k4m3
Could you all describe how the camber plates have been helping? How have you used them to get what benefit? Thanks!
from what I seeing ..there are two option camber 38mm and 40mm
so the stock must be 39mm between two available option camber plates
38mm plate allow to run longer camber link which will get less camber gain and easy to drive /40mm plate just the opposite..most likely used for carpet set up
OVA is offline  
Old 08-16-2022, 04:04 PM
  #435  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
gigaplex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 6,248
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by OVA
from what I seeing ..there are two option camber 38mm and 40mm
so the stock must be 39mm between two available option camber plates
38mm plate allow to run longer camber link which will get less camber gain and easy to drive /40mm plate just the opposite..most likely used for carpet set up
Stock is 42 on the front and 46 on the rear.
gigaplex is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.