jo_er86

iTrader: (11)

Rumored adjusteable 5:5 to 6:4 config.

Billy Kelly

iTrader: (9)

Could be interested. Been using older models for my on road. Now running more regularly. Might be time to start with something completely new.

Dan

iTrader: (75)

Looks good, maybe this will be the first time a 3racing car will be stronger than an Xray (X4)

jo_er86

iTrader: (11)

might retire my 20M’s sooner than I thought. I have $$$ invested in parts too bu lt that x4/MTC2 copy is too tempting especially if priced just right.

Which chassis do you run?

Billy Kelly

iTrader: (9)

Currently a 2017 Xray T4 is primary chassis.

DavidNERODease

Looks like it uses screws instead of nuts to hold the wheels on.

robk

iTrader: (22)

Xtracrispy

The motor mount is interesting.
Looks like the spur will stay in the same spot, but you can shift weight balance by mounting the motor to either side of the layshaft.
The upper arms look to already be tooled and undergoing QA, plastic material.

moparSRT

Is it available yet ?? lol

Xrayray

Lol you tell me when I can buy this from you!

MikeO

knightrider

iTrader: (2)

20m going into retirement when this one comes out

jo_er86

iTrader: (11)

You can count on me preordering at racevta!

h2e

Looks interesting.
+ potentially shorter/narrower chassis than C4/MTC2 due to bulkhead mounted shock attachment.
+motor holder idea (looks more front flex biased)
+bulkheads looks solid
+short shocks

potentially weak spots:
- upper A-arms (inner ballcups seem thin plastic with huge inserts)
- hubs seem to have too thin material between wheel bearings and lower ballhead
-lower carbon arms seem heavy
-wheel bearings seem very close to each other
-potentially high unsprung mass due to very beefy camber adjustment.

Looking forward to hear more about this car, especially chassis shape and durability.

Lonestar

iTrader: (14)

low blow