Dan

iTrader: (75)

Thread for Schumacher's first ever F1

Double D Donuts

iTrader: (15)

Cool - Always wanted to try an F1 and keep it in the family

1/8 IC Fan

iTrader: (102)

Nice, i hope this marks a more aggressive entry into the ETS series and support classes as well.

qcrc

iTrader: (11)

I hope that this is going to be released. I've always thought that pod design would be fantastic for F1. I was real close to having a chassis made but I couldn't decide which front end I was going to use. I put it on the back burner as I moved away from F1. This will definitely bring me back.

Scott_T

iTrader: (5)

Should make for a simple rear wing mount.

BullFrog

iTrader: (4)

under the current rules the front supension has to be the Tamiya 2 different versions.

photeckk

iTrader: (21)

What makes the car different?

OVA

iTrader: (86)

Like the TRF102? don't know never saw any pic

BullFrog

iTrader: (4)

the two frontends : basically CRC is like the orginal Tamiya frontend and the rest like xray is the other. look at the ROAR rules.Both have been modified alittle but the basic design.

Airwave

iTrader: (1)

CRC design is a little bit different from Tamiya, as you can have adaptative camber and reactive caster, it is quite important.

BullFrog

iTrader: (4)

Really- it is the same basic Tamiya orginal frontend on the CRC. The orginal CRC F1 had the Tamiya frontend. All version present is just a modified version of the F103 frontend.I still have some of the orginal F1 chassis by CRC when we raced on foam tires.Most everyone use the newer Tamiya frontend .

purplerain

iTrader: (3)

there’s no reactive caster on the CRC front end.

robk

iTrader: (22)

If you shim the rear screw between the lower and upper bulkhead, you can get some reactive caster in there.

ptrhahn

Funny thing is, there could easily be by just molding alternate top caps (1543) for the front end.

BullFrog

iTrader: (4)

you mean the part I believe 3racing made years ago . Got part if it just sitting around (base).