Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Copying Stadium Super Truck suspension for RC? >

Copying Stadium Super Truck suspension for RC?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Copying Stadium Super Truck suspension for RC?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-2018, 09:22 PM
  #16  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,766
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Lots of weird things were tried back then. Paragon sold Jump Jets which were tapered pins that went through the piston holes. As shocks compressed the taper on the pin took up more and more area of the piston hole until it was nearly closed by the top. It varied pack with travel and speed. We ran light oil with them. The idea sounded neat but in practice they didn't work very well. We mostly used the little internal springs to help dissipate the rebound shock to the shock bottom when the shock fully extended again. The shock bottoms were soft by modern standards and were easy to strip out. It sucked having a shock blow apart.
fredswain is offline  
Old 02-16-2018, 09:45 PM
  #17  
Tech Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Zumbrota, MN
Posts: 585
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by urnotevenwrg2
Losi already tried the spring under the piston idea. I can't remember why they stopped running them, but I think the spring made the car do something weird.

A lot of pistons are now available that have 2 or 3 normal holes, and a single 1.0mm "transition" hole. At lower shaft speed the dampening is a little softer, then at higher shaft speeds the small hole packs up and the dampening slows down a little. I run 4 hole pistons. The holes are ovalized, and two of the holes are stepped. On bumpy tracks they are a definite advantage over standard pistons. I want to try some pistons with a transition hole, just to see the difference.

I only like the SST's on dirt. Pavement and ramps, no thanks.

I'm really curious about this, the reason for the springs, and the reason they stopped using them? Was it just a one time thing, or were there several models that used the internal springs?

My search found the Losi XX4 Worlds Edition, and the internal springs were just for the front.


I found pictures and videos of the car, but no comments about the front suspension.


(And I agree that running offroad trucks on pavement leaves a lot to be desired.)



*edit*

I just found online comments referring to the internal springs as "limiters". I guess that's simple enough. Same idea as what Fred said.

The comments also suggested that they were best suited for smooth tracks.

The idea of internal limiters is where I started. I was thinking about using internal limiters instead of droop screws. I modified my front A-arms to give me less caster (i.e. front uprights standing up straighter), but it moves the droop screws half way off of their perch. And the perch is already worn significantly, maybe half way through. It's just the steel screw against the aluminum chassis, so naturally the aluminum is going to wear first. (This is on my mbx7r eco.)

So I though about using shock o-rings as an internal bump stop. And then I realized that using a spring would effectively give me the kind of suspension performance I had been thinking about months ago when I started this thread.

Last edited by fredygump; 02-16-2018 at 11:22 PM.
fredygump is offline  
Old 02-19-2018, 11:37 AM
  #18  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (168)
 
ta_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,193
Trader Rating: 168 (100%+)
Default

Regarding SST setup, what I'd like to know is how to get my RC stadium truck on pavement to be lifting the inner front (like the SST) instead of the inner rear.

Anyone have suggestions for that?
ta_man is offline  
Old 02-19-2018, 01:46 PM
  #19  
Tech Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Zumbrota, MN
Posts: 585
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by ta_man
Regarding SST setup, what I'd like to know is how to get my RC stadium truck on pavement to be lifting the inner front (like the SST) instead of the inner rear.

Anyone have suggestions for that?
Remove the sway bars if you have them, and keep the springs and shock oil fairly light. And maximum suspension droop. I think part of it is a result of the rear straight axle w/ 4 link suspension.

(It's technically a bad thing from a speed and racing perspective, but it's the result of taking a pure offroad truck and making it run on pavement.)

I know the Yeti XL does this all the time. It's the thing about the truck that most people complained about, atleast from what I've seen. People were desperate to install sway bars, because the thing lifted a front wheel with full acceleration.



If you're lifting the inner rear...when turning, that means the front springs are soft--too much weight is transferring to the outside front.

To get it the other way around, you want stiff front springs and soft rear springs. And it's only going to on acceleration out of a turn, b/c that is when weight is transferred to the rear.

But the Yeti lifts a wheel on straight acceleration, which is what I was thinking first.

Last edited by fredygump; 02-19-2018 at 01:57 PM.
fredygump is offline  
Old 02-20-2018, 09:06 AM
  #20  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (21)
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,782
Trader Rating: 21 (100%+)
Default

Bypass shocks can't be scaled down for our use unfortunately. Now if anyone ever figures out how to make inerters for our scale, it's game over.
MX304 is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.