Tekno RC EB410 Thread
|
|||
#4325
Tech Master
iTrader: (35)
the area of a circle is;
pi x R squared
Sucks I cant type the proper symbols for the equation on my computer.
That all being said here is what I came up with.
All my answers are in mm squared fyi.
4 x 1.7mm =9.0746mm
4 x 1.8mm =10.1736mm
4 x 2.0mm =12.56mm
4 x 2.1mm =13.8474mm
My bad for some reason I figured them as 4 hole.
2 x 1.7mm =4.54mm
2 x 1.8mm =5.09mm
2 x 2.0mm =6.28mm
2 x 2.1mm =6.92mm
pi x R squared
Sucks I cant type the proper symbols for the equation on my computer.
That all being said here is what I came up with.
All my answers are in mm squared fyi.
4 x 1.8mm =10.1736mm
4 x 2.0mm =12.56mm
4 x 2.1mm =13.8474mm
My bad for some reason I figured them as 4 hole.
2 x 1.7mm =4.54mm
2 x 1.8mm =5.09mm
2 x 2.0mm =6.28mm
2 x 2.1mm =6.92mm
Last edited by Tbuggy; 05-18-2018 at 07:08 PM.
#4326
I tested out the shocks forward mod tonight and noticed the car turned better and would hold a tighter line in the tighter sections of the track. This was on a hard packed dirt - indoor track with traction being down from where it normally was during our recent winter season. My lap times were more consistent tonight and I was able to run a bunch of laps that were only a couple hundredths off of my best ever lap when tracton had been higher.
I trimmed the rear A arms and added spacers to help lengthen the wheelbase to get closer to stock, but think I ended up 1mm shorter than the stock position. I'm unsure what to credit the improvement in handling to, but believe the shorter wheelbase might net similar results with the shocks out back. I'm going to swap it back around and see if a shorter wheelbase (arms have already been trimmed) with the shocks in the rear position nets similar results...
Anyone else with the shock forward mod go back to shocks in the rear with the trimmed a arms running a shorter wheelbase?
I trimmed the rear A arms and added spacers to help lengthen the wheelbase to get closer to stock, but think I ended up 1mm shorter than the stock position. I'm unsure what to credit the improvement in handling to, but believe the shorter wheelbase might net similar results with the shocks out back. I'm going to swap it back around and see if a shorter wheelbase (arms have already been trimmed) with the shocks in the rear position nets similar results...
Anyone else with the shock forward mod go back to shocks in the rear with the trimmed a arms running a shorter wheelbase?
#4328
#4330
I used the set screws that came with the kit and they seemed to have stayed put after a night of practice. If you don't have the set screws snugged up, you won't get the full effects of your sway bar - similar to running a thinner sway bar.
#4333
was using the Raceform swaybar holder and their new shock tower with camber link holes.
Last edited by suzukipro; 05-20-2018 at 05:11 PM.
#4334
Tech Legend
iTrader: (294)
I noticed the car turned and rotated and held a tighter line in the 180° turns and it felt more predictable, although I am unsure if these improvements were due to to the shorter wheelbase or the combination of shocks up front, shorter wheelbase & dogbone plunge?
was using the Raceform swaybar holder and their new shock tower with camber link holes.
was using the Raceform swaybar holder and their new shock tower with camber link holes.
#4335
Tech Master
iTrader: (35)
I will make it easy for you, use this to calculate a single hole and then multiply the answer by the number of holes; https://www.mathsisfun.com/geometry/circle-area.html
8 x 1.1mm= 7.6mm squared