Like Tree8Likes

New Schumacher KF2

    Hide Wikipost
Old 07-29-2016, 08:27 AM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech Forums Thread Wiki: New Schumacher KF2
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: MelKF2
Welcome to the KF2 Wiki!

Please feel free to add any Tips, Tricks, or anything that would be beneficial to the KF2 Family

Introduction and Pictures Introduction and Pictures

ElectronicsSetupElectronicsSetups

Setup SheetsSetup Sheets

EmulsionShocksEmulsion Shocks

Tony Newland Gear Diff BuildTony Newland Gear Diff Build

Suggested Gearing

6.5
7.5
8.5
9.5
10.5
13.5
17.5 I ran 69/31 at SRS Scottsdale Arizona and 72/30 at MHOR Aurora Co and Full Throttle ALB, NM RCM lockout worked excellent!


MIP pucks excellent upgrade! The new RCM lockout is an excellent piece as well! These options will greatly reduce weight throughout the drive line!

Print Wikipost

Reply

Old 06-02-2015, 06:07 AM
  #316  
Tech Master
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,414
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by motorcitymatt View Post
Interesting. This is why I was very curious to see an actual measurement of this layout as eyeballing it does not always end up agreeing with the measured results, which in this case were counterintuitive (at least to me). But based on what Maizer is saying I do not think it was his intent for this design/experiment to be made public let alone scrutinized so I digress.

With regards to the comments about the method of measuring used my question to anyone is: What are you trying to measure? If you want to determine where the center of mass is on the car then the best way to do that is how Tony has been suggesting. Remove and/or account for all the unsprung mass and take the spring pre-load out of the equation by using struts to set the suspension level at ride height. Once you can see where the center of mass moves as you make changes then you can start answering questions about dynamic weight transfer and handling.

This is not to say that scaling a car on tires has no value. It is just not as accurate in determining the car's center of mass, which is the key element affecting the car's handling.
I made the changes to the car to make it more 17.5 friendly, and after testing feel it is. The car has more rear grip regardless of the scales. The true test is coming as i have put my mod motor back in.
maizer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2015, 05:28 PM
  #317  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: surprise arizona
Posts: 549
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

does the chassis U4613 fit the kf 2 with low grip kit?
psycho02 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2015, 09:30 PM
  #318  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (50)
 
Tony Newland's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 5,837
Trader Rating: 50 (100%+)
Default

No... rear arm mounts are different between KF/KF2
Tony Newland is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2015, 07:15 AM
  #319  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: surprise arizona
Posts: 549
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

[QUOTE=Tony Newland;14053815]No... rear arm mounts are different between KF/KF2

Is there a cf chassis for the kf2 with low grip kit?
psycho02 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2015, 02:34 PM
  #320  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (50)
 
Tony Newland's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 5,837
Trader Rating: 50 (100%+)
Default

Not that im aware of
Tony Newland is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2015, 03:52 PM
  #321  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (27)
 
hanulec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: @ the post office
Posts: 8,666
Trader Rating: 27 (100%+)
Default

U4687
Just installed it last night. 86g vs 150g
Stock buggy dropped from 1565 to 1499
hanulec is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2015, 03:57 PM
  #322  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (50)
 
Tony Newland's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 5,837
Trader Rating: 50 (100%+)
Default

Aha there ya go... no pic on Schu site so I didnt see it
Tony Newland is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2015, 05:25 PM
  #323  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (27)
 
hanulec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: @ the post office
Posts: 8,666
Trader Rating: 27 (100%+)
Default

the boys at discountrc know all about it--
http://www.discountrcstore.com/Schum...mm_p/u4687.htm
hanulec is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2015, 11:29 PM
  #324  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 768
Trader Rating: 9 (91%+)
Default

Saw a big price drop on the SV2. A new mid-motor release soon?
KM.....
leongkc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2015, 09:29 AM
  #325  
Tech Regular
 
Jpdanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: TRCR
Posts: 390
Default

Originally Posted by leongkc View Post
Saw a big price drop on the SV2. A new mid-motor release soon?
KM.....
I've heard a rumor of a new Cougar SV. SV3 maybe?
Jpdanger is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2015, 10:49 AM
  #326  
Tech Adept
 
Mustrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 105
Default

I wish belt drive..!
Mustrum is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2015, 08:39 PM
  #327  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (27)
 
hanulec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: @ the post office
Posts: 8,666
Trader Rating: 27 (100%+)
Default

After graphite chassis swap I lost some roll. Gotta adjust shims next time out.
hanulec is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2015, 10:36 PM
  #328  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 768
Trader Rating: 9 (91%+)
Default

One question, if I remove the 2 side braces, is it going to be a durability issue?
leongkc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2015, 10:41 AM
  #329  
Tech Regular
 
Jpdanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: TRCR
Posts: 390
Default

Originally Posted by leongkc View Post
One question, if I remove the 2 side braces, is it going to be a durability issue?
I know this is a late reply, but I run without the side braces/plastic and no battery hold down braces either (tape battery in place) and I've seen no change in durability. I also noticed little change in the flex of the chassis too. The aluminum chassis by itself is pretty rigid. I race on hard pack clay.
Jpdanger is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2015, 10:52 AM
  #330  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (27)
 
hanulec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: @ the post office
Posts: 8,666
Trader Rating: 27 (100%+)
Default

I run cf chassis in shorty batt/rear motor config without any plastic sides or top deck
hanulec is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Terms of Service