Like Tree8Likes

New Schumacher KF2

    Hide Wikipost
Old 07-29-2016, 08:27 AM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech Forums Thread Wiki: New Schumacher KF2
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: MelKF2
Welcome to the KF2 Wiki!

Please feel free to add any Tips, Tricks, or anything that would be beneficial to the KF2 Family

Introduction and Pictures Introduction and Pictures

ElectronicsSetupElectronicsSetups

Setup SheetsSetup Sheets

EmulsionShocksEmulsion Shocks

Tony Newland Gear Diff BuildTony Newland Gear Diff Build

Suggested Gearing

6.5
7.5
8.5
9.5
10.5
13.5
17.5 I ran 69/31 at SRS Scottsdale Arizona and 72/30 at MHOR Aurora Co and Full Throttle ALB, NM RCM lockout worked excellent!


MIP pucks excellent upgrade! The new RCM lockout is an excellent piece as well! These options will greatly reduce weight throughout the drive line!

Print Wikipost

Reply

Old 05-22-2015, 01:52 PM
  #301  
Tech Master
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,414
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Jpdanger View Post
Yes. Race ready box stock with aluminum camber mounts and CF chassis weighed in at 1540g without a body. I believe if you remove the side rails and stiffeners you'll drop about 40g if memory serves???
My car ready to race, is 1599 right now with the side rails off. I wanted to try small bore shocks, titanium turnbuckles, and CF chassis to cut some more weight.
maizer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2015, 08:56 AM
  #302  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (50)
 
Tony Newland's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 5,837
Trader Rating: 50 (100%+)
Default

Carbon chassis is 60g lighter than alum if Im remebering correctly...

It add grip with more flex and raising cg slightly.. I didnt like the alum even on high bite
Tony Newland is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2015, 07:32 PM
  #303  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (27)
 
hanulec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: @ the post office
Posts: 8,684
Trader Rating: 27 (100%+)
Default

did a little weight balance measurements on Wednesday night with Maizer. the results might surprise you.

first my KF2


now the maizer-KF2
hanulec is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2015, 07:21 AM
  #304  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (50)
 
Tony Newland's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 5,837
Trader Rating: 50 (100%+)
Default

Its tough to get accurate reading on those scales unless you replace the shocks with turnbuckles.. preload can change the numbers alot
Tony Newland is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2015, 07:24 AM
  #305  
Suspended
iTrader: (61)
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,124
Trader Rating: 61 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Tony Newland View Post
Its tough to get accurate reading on those scales unless you replace the shocks with turnbuckles.. preload can change the numbers alot
As well as dirty tires. Remember, the rears will retain more dirt than the fronts, and throwing the numbers off.
Socket is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2015, 08:34 AM
  #306  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (27)
 
hanulec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: @ the post office
Posts: 8,684
Trader Rating: 27 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Tony Newland View Post
Its tough to get accurate reading on those scales unless you replace the shocks with turnbuckles.. preload can change the numbers alot
left to right "tweak" can be impacted for sure, but not front to rear balance --- which was my only analysis goal.

Originally Posted by Socket View Post
As well as dirty tires. Remember, the rears will retain more dirt than the fronts, and throwing the numbers off.
i can see this being impactful. maybe more impactful is that we have different tires.
hanulec is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2015, 01:09 PM
  #307  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (50)
 
Tony Newland's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 5,837
Trader Rating: 50 (100%+)
Default

I disagree... scales dont know which tire is on them
Tony Newland is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2015, 01:11 PM
  #308  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (50)
 
Tony Newland's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 5,837
Trader Rating: 50 (100%+)
Default

I always weighed my cars on the chassis.... tires are irrelvant for a weight distribution comparison since they are unsprung weight
Tony Newland is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2015, 04:29 PM
  #309  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Fly-over Country
Posts: 628
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

You don't race your car with turnbuckles instead of shocks, why weigh it that way? Stop cheating the scales to get certain percentages and focus on how the changes you make effect handling. Yes preload effects scale readings, it's called weight transfer... one big reason for tuning your suspension and the whole reason to use scales.
Banshee8530 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2015, 04:52 PM
  #310  
Tech Adept
 
UNSTABLE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 169
Default

Originally Posted by Banshee8530 View Post
You don't race your car with turnbuckles instead of shocks, why weigh it that way? Stop cheating the scales to get certain percentages and focus on how the changes you make effect handling. Yes preload effects scale readings, it's called weight transfer... one big reason for tuning your suspension and the whole reason to use scales.
Valid point if you already have your electronics/chassis layout balanced, but trying to do that with the variable of shock pre-load is not the best idea.
UNSTABLE is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2015, 05:02 PM
  #311  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (50)
 
Tony Newland's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 5,837
Trader Rating: 50 (100%+)
Default

Preload is unrelated to weight transfer, maybe you meant weight distribution? Anyhow... doesn't matter to me how you take the info I supply. Sounds like you guys have it all figured out, I'll leave you guys to the engineering.
Tony Newland is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2015, 03:54 AM
  #312  
Tech Adept
 
UNSTABLE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 169
Default

Originally Posted by Tony Newland View Post
Preload is unrelated to weight transfer, maybe you meant weight distribution? Anyhow... doesn't matter to me how you take the info I supply. Sounds like you guys have it all figured out, I'll leave you guys to the engineering.
Hmmm, I was actually agreeing with you but I guess you could read that either way.
UNSTABLE is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2015, 07:35 AM
  #313  
Tech Master
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,414
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default The scale Photo

Let me just say this, that will explain the front to rear weight readings. The yellow buggy has a small servo and all stock front running gear. The white car, my car has a full size servo, aluminum steering rack, and front link mount. Also I have removed a lot of weight from the transmission and moved it back on the chassis as fare as I could. The battery is now in the center. Overall I feel the car is better on wet clay running slicks or treaded tires, at Critters. At Cruzzin I well the same. Now that I have the transmission/motor were I feel is best, I will work on my setup, as I have been running 1.8 rear springs and 4.0 fronts and all the other adjustments to cause less steering and more rear grip. Im sorry for not answering questions or posting photos on how to do what im doing with this car. I cant give away to much information, and would not even be talking about it if that photo did not get posted.
maizer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2015, 10:56 AM
  #314  
Tech Regular
 
Jpdanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: TRCR
Posts: 390
Default

Why the secrecy?
Jpdanger is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2015, 09:31 PM
  #315  
Tech Adept
 
motorcitymatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 244
Default

Interesting. This is why I was very curious to see an actual measurement of this layout as eyeballing it does not always end up agreeing with the measured results, which in this case were counterintuitive (at least to me). But based on what Maizer is saying I do not think it was his intent for this design/experiment to be made public let alone scrutinized so I digress.

With regards to the comments about the method of measuring used my question to anyone is: What are you trying to measure? If you want to determine where the center of mass is on the car then the best way to do that is how Tony has been suggesting. Remove and/or account for all the unsprung mass and take the spring pre-load out of the equation by using struts to set the suspension level at ride height. Once you can see where the center of mass moves as you make changes then you can start answering questions about dynamic weight transfer and handling.

This is not to say that scaling a car on tires has no value. It is just not as accurate in determining the car's center of mass, which is the key element affecting the car's handling.

Last edited by motorcitymatt; 06-02-2015 at 05:58 AM.
motorcitymatt is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Terms of Service