Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Sad story:  Cheating rampant at big races... >

Sad story: Cheating rampant at big races...

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Sad story: Cheating rampant at big races...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-05-2014, 06:58 PM
  #751  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (38)
 
Oasis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: * Sin Cal *
Posts: 11,010
Trader Rating: 38 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Dave H
Not allowseened. A couple snips:

5.2.3
The use of traction control sensing devices, active suspension devices, and steering control devices aided by gyroscopes or accelerometers (G-force sensors) of any kind is strictly prohibited. Sensors may be used for the purpose of passive data recording but not for adjusting the performance of the vehicle while in motion.

10.8.2
No onboard traction control or other electronic aids are allowed, other than fail-safe systems.
All very true..but I have never seen a radio go through tech....I've never personally used any electronic aid..but they would help me for sure....but I'm sure theirs racers using them..as in any form of racing some will cheat and most won't..
Oasis is offline  
Old 08-05-2014, 07:28 PM
  #752  
Tech Champion
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,342
Default

Originally Posted by Oasis
All very true..but I have never seen a radio go through tech....I've never personally used any electronic aid..but they would help me for sure....but I'm sure theirs racers using them..as in any form of racing some will cheat and most won't..
Little different and long age but I've seen radio frequency checks at some of the bigger races. Historical note, I believe the no aid rule came about when Jürgen Lautenbach (Mr. LRP) had a prototype traction control device at the '93 IFMAR Worlds I think it was.

Would it be checked for at a club race, no not likely. Unless it's noticed that someone has rather special car control and it's challenged I suppose. Developing technology presents both opportunity and new challenges no doubt.

I agree most don't cheat, well at least not knowingly. But the perception, or whatever the correct word is, that some may be can be corrosive as many have mentioned.
Dave H is offline  
Old 08-05-2014, 10:24 PM
  #753  
Tech Master
iTrader: (29)
 
3srcracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,931
Trader Rating: 29 (100%+)
Default

So if everyone thinks 17.5 buggy should be tech ed even at a club racing level, what is the best way to do it without spending a lot of time and breaking down each motor?

Because you can look at it and see it is legal and still has the 12.5 rotor in it, but what about the rest of the motor?
3srcracing is offline  
Old 08-05-2014, 11:31 PM
  #754  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (38)
 
Oasis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: * Sin Cal *
Posts: 11,010
Trader Rating: 38 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by 3srcracing
So if everyone thinks 17.5 buggy should be tech ed evif someonen at a club racing level, what is the best way to do it without spending a lot of time and breaking down each motor?

Because you can look at it and see it is legal and still has the 12.5 rotor in it, but what about the rest of the motor?
You can tell just by watching the cars on the track..no need to tech every car..if you pay attention you know..
Oasis is offline  
Old 08-06-2014, 12:45 AM
  #755  
Tech Champion
 
Zerodefect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 5,620
Default

The difference between a well tuned 17.5 2wd buggy and a 2wd buggy with a drop in, out of the package 17.5, and the book gear setup, is huge.

Once I found the sweet gear and timing setup, free'd up my drivetrain, shimmend my motor perfectly, and removed my slipper assembly, my car was so much faster it had to look like I was cheating. And that was off road on pottery clay.

I'd imagine it's even worse in on road.

Doesn't seem "fair" to me. There's a ton of racers in stock that'll never find that 17.5's sweet spot. Slowing the cars down further with 21.5, will only widen the gap between the "haves", and "have nots".

I think the stock guys just want a class where they can hang onto their unfair advantage. Stock is anything but fair and even. If you want equal power, run mod.

This thread is just like one of the "hacking" threads. Bunch of racers: "I run clean, i don't hack." Yet Rc is a 90% hackfest right now. 17.5 cheating is everywhere.
Zerodefect is offline  
Old 08-06-2014, 12:45 AM
  #756  
Tech Champion
 
Zerodefect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 5,620
Default

dupe
Zerodefect is offline  
Old 08-06-2014, 05:13 AM
  #757  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (33)
 
rcgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Blackfoot Idaho.
Posts: 3,464
Trader Rating: 33 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by 3srcracing
So if everyone thinks 17.5 buggy should be tech ed even at a club racing level, what is the best way to do it without spending a lot of time and breaking down each motor?

Because you can look at it and see it is legal and still has the 12.5 rotor in it, but what about the rest of the motor?
You can't tell whether the rotor is a stock 12.5 or mod 12.5 unless you tear it down and measure.
It's not the od that's different it's the id where it attaches to the shaft. Mod rotor has more magnet and is thicker.
rcgod is offline  
Old 08-06-2014, 04:33 PM
  #758  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,059
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Zerodefect
The difference between a well tuned 17.5 2wd buggy and a 2wd buggy with a drop in, out of the package 17.5, and the book gear setup, is huge.

Once I found the sweet gear and timing setup, free'd up my drivetrain, shimmend my motor perfectly, and removed my slipper assembly, my car was so much faster it had to look like I was cheating. And that was off road on pottery clay.

I'd imagine it's even worse in on road.

Doesn't seem "fair" to me. There's a ton of racers in stock that'll never find that 17.5's sweet spot. Slowing the cars down further with 21.5, will only widen the gap between the "haves", and "have nots".
Pretty much and despite the comments about blinky being easier for the average racer it is very hard to be fast.

To be fast in blinky it is quite complex and realistically requires a brushless motor tester.

The fastest guys here are mixing and matching sensor boards, rotors, stators whilst shimming sensor boards & rotors to get the best out of them. Not to mention the rezapping of rotors or using outlaw rotors.

They are also pushing the motors very hard going through lots of rotors and melting plenty stators. 8 shorted stators at a recent event which was blinky.

For club day racing it appears to be run what you like regardless of the rules. At a recent club day 4 out of 10 cars were running blinky the other 6 were not. 3 were happy to admit to running boost with the justification that they were slow and used boost to keep up. The other 3 denied running boost although the ESCs clearly indicated they were not running blinky.

Happy for guys to try boost on club days as club days are all about practice and testing but at some point club day racing becomes pointless if guys are cheating to try and get the win.
frozenpod is offline  
Old 08-06-2014, 05:05 PM
  #759  
Tech Champion
 
Zerodefect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 5,620
Default

Originally Posted by frozenpod
Pretty much and despite the comments about blinky being easier for the average racer it is very hard to be fast.

To be fast in blinky it is quite complex and realistically requires a brushless motor tester.

The fastest guys here are mixing and matching sensor boards, rotors, stators whilst shimming sensor boards & rotors to get the best out of them. Not to mention the rezapping of rotors or using outlaw rotors.

They are also pushing the motors very hard going through lots of rotors and melting plenty stators. 8 shorted stators at a recent event which was blinky.

For club day racing it appears to be run what you like regardless of the rules. At a recent club day 4 out of 10 cars were running blinky the other 6 were not. 3 were happy to admit to running boost with the justification that they were slow and used boost to keep up. The other 3 denied running boost although the ESCs clearly indicated they were not running blinky.

Happy for guys to try boost on club days as club days are all about practice and testing but at some point club day racing becomes pointless if guys are cheating to try and get the win.
And stock racers like this better than mod? Weird, isn't it?


Stock.
-it ain't fair
-it ain't slow
-it ain't for beginners
-it ain't cheaper

What's the point of all this again?
Zerodefect is offline  
Old 08-06-2014, 06:28 PM
  #760  
Suspended
iTrader: (12)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,990
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by frozenpod
Pretty much and despite the comments about blinky being easier for the average racer it is very hard to be fast.

To be fast in blinky it is quite complex and realistically requires a brushless motor tester.

The fastest guys here are mixing and matching sensor boards, rotors, stators whilst shimming sensor boards & rotors to get the best out of them. Not to mention the rezapping of rotors or using outlaw rotors.

They are also pushing the motors very hard going through lots of rotors and melting plenty stators. 8 shorted stators at a recent event which was blinky.

For club day racing it appears to be run what you like regardless of the rules. At a recent club day 4 out of 10 cars were running blinky the other 6 were not. 3 were happy to admit to running boost with the justification that they were slow and used boost to keep up. The other 3 denied running boost although the ESCs clearly indicated they were not running blinky.

Happy for guys to try boost on club days as club days are all about practice and testing but at some point club day racing becomes pointless if guys are cheating to try and get the win.
This is b.s. I know plenty of fast stock guys and none of them do any of this. Heck, they arent even smart enough to do any of this
PFKAOG is offline  
Old 08-06-2014, 06:39 PM
  #761  
Suspended
iTrader: (12)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,990
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Zerodefect
And stock racers like this better than mod? Weird, isn't it?


Stock.
-it ain't fair
-it ain't slow
-it ain't for beginners
-it ain't cheaper

What's the point of all this again?
What isnt fair about it? It takes work to be fast in stock. If you're lazy, you'll be slow.

It aint cheaper than what? Why do so many people think it cost a lot more than mod?
PFKAOG is offline  
Old 08-06-2014, 06:59 PM
  #762  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,059
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Mod uses more tyres, more wear on drive line but blinky stock costs more in motors and for some battery.

I will let you know in a few months after I run mod which is cheaper. Two guys that have run both locally say mod is cheaper than blinky.
frozenpod is offline  
Old 08-06-2014, 07:00 PM
  #763  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,059
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by PFKAOG
This is b.s. I know plenty of fast stock guys and none of them do any of this. Heck, they arent even smart enough to do any of this
I guess it depends on the level of competition and what the competitors are doing.

Unless they go lucky with a great motor out of the box they would be slow here.
frozenpod is offline  
Old 08-06-2014, 07:33 PM
  #764  
Suspended
iTrader: (12)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,990
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by frozenpod
I guess it depends on the level of competition and what the competitors are doing.

Unless they go lucky with a great motor out of the box they would be slow here.
Because they are slow there doesnt mean that's how it is for everyone
PFKAOG is offline  
Old 08-06-2014, 07:35 PM
  #765  
Suspended
iTrader: (12)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,990
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by frozenpod
Mod uses more tyres, more wear on drive line but blinky stock costs more in motors and for some battery.

I will let you know in a few months after I run mod which is cheaper. Two guys that have run both locally say mod is cheaper than blinky.
How so?

Im really trying to understand people's logic and thinking because I just dont see it at my local tracks and we have quite a few fast people.

The kid that won 17.5 buggy at this years Cactus Classic doesnt spend money on a fancy charger ( his is somebody's used hand me down ), new batteries regularly ( his is somebody's used hand me down 60c ) or a hand full of new motors ( he has 1 that is more than 6 months old ). Also he doesnt have a bunch of light weight after market parts on his car but yet he is very fast. I believe this same kid ( Ashe Deering ) was just the T.Q. at last weekends Surf City race at OCRC in 17.5 buggy.
Aslo..
The kid that got 2nd at this years Cactus Classic ran a used B4 ( not a B5 ) That was a hand me down from another racer that moved to a B5.

With this being said, where is this added cost to run 17.5 blinky everyone keeps mentioning when these 2 kids that dont have all the stuff people think they need to have to be fast are fast and wins without it?

Last edited by PFKAOG; 08-06-2014 at 09:36 PM.
PFKAOG is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.