Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor Thread
|
|||
#751

You are right that it will not give more room in either of the b5's. I only mean to point out that it is worth trying pulling weight instead of adding weight, as davidka has tried to point out the problems of simply piling on weight. In short, The c4.2 seems to me to be more forgiving when coming on power with less weight up front. I'm wondering if we have to reconsider how weight transfer works on mm cars and not think only in terms of rm weight transfer.



#752
Tech Apprentice

Pure speculation, but I think this weight adding will not be the trend as we figure these cars out. I will note, however, that ae has plastic, aluminum, and brass pivots for the b5m.






#753

Half the price ..
Everyone will do soon.( short servo)
Don't think so ?
Ck Maifields C4..

#756
Tech Apprentice

http://www.teamassociated.com/pdf/ca...ield_CRCRC.pdf
http://2wdmod.com/2014/01/28/michael-schoettlersc42/


#761

Anyone care to comment as to how much the B5 series and the Yokomo appear to be twins serparated @ birth?

#763

- has has the front shocks front mounted, b5 rear mounted
- yok has pin and bearing wheels, b5 has front and rear hex
- Bmax rear mounts the rear shocks and the b5 front mounts the rear shocks.
- yok has ball cups and the b5 has captured ends
- yok uses c-hubs still, the b5 does not.
nope, sorry I dont see it.
