Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor & Rear Motor Thread
|
|||
#1651
Tech Regular
#1652
Different chassis's with different flex characteristics will be left for the aftermarket companies to deal with........
#1653
Tech Master
iTrader: (67)
Just cause I havent seen anyone post the link for the full article with the 3 videos from Rc Car Action here it is:
http://www.rccaraction.com/blog/2014...c10b5-and-b5m/
Regarding BRSracings statement about the B5M being under development for as long as the B5, the interview makes it sound as though the separate B5m platform came along a lot later.
I also feel that from the interview and the fact that they dont enough cars/parts to run at the Reedy Race that the posted dates on AMAIN for late Feb for b5 and march for b5m are probably pretty close
http://www.rccaraction.com/blog/2014...c10b5-and-b5m/
Regarding BRSracings statement about the B5M being under development for as long as the B5, the interview makes it sound as though the separate B5m platform came along a lot later.
I also feel that from the interview and the fact that they dont enough cars/parts to run at the Reedy Race that the posted dates on AMAIN for late Feb for b5 and march for b5m are probably pretty close
#1657
#1659
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
From all I have seen and read the MM was in the works long before the MM craze last year. The MM was planned right along with the RM, just as it was on the 22 and RB6. I have driven the B4's and the B4 with the centro kit. Both are capable of winning a race on any given day, but they drive like night and day difference in my opinion. I am no pro but I plan to give both RM and MM a try. I think the focus of the factory teams seems to be leaning more and more towards MM. It will be interesting to see if MM stays around as the go to chassis.
#1662
#1664
#1665
While watching the racing going on at the Reedy Race and seeing the two Ryan's leading the event with the C4.1's it's almost worth it to wonder why we need the B5M