Hot Bodies D413 1/10 4WD Buggy
#4951
yeah if its smooth reds would be ok for you. i think yellow is the stiffest i can get away with cause its rarely ever smooth. lol
#4952
But bottom line that really does suck that you had that issue.
#4954
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
Wow really that sucks. You should have contacted him he would have sent you a new pair free of charge. He has a very good warranty policy and is easy to reach either from his thread here on rctech or his website.
But bottom line that really does suck that you had that issue.
But bottom line that really does suck that you had that issue.
#4955
one step higher would be blue if i remember right.
#4958
#4962
Hey guys, I am running the usual 2x1.6 and 2x1.7 pistons and I'm having issues with this car still being really soft and lacking pack. I even ventured up to 45 and 40 wt shock oil just to try to stiffen this thing up a little bit. Is anyone else having these issues? I dont want to purchase the 20 dollar a set Kyosho springs that Ty uses if that wont solve my problem... Thanks for the help.
#4963
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
I had the same problem, just about every wheeler runs the 2x1.6 front and 2x1.7 rear piston setup with a large amount of success. This wheeler sucked ass with that setup and I went as high as 47.5 front and 42.5 rear and it was still way bouncy. So, I went the other way and tried 35 front and 30 rear and it was even WORSE. The only conclusion I can come to is that TY is running a special Pro-Line piston, or the Xgear and Kyosho springs are just that much better. Cause I also tried TLR and AE springs to no avail. Long story short after a full day of testing, I settled on 4x1.3 pistons on all 4 and 40wt. on all 4. with the stock springs. The car felt pretty good but was still a little on the soft side.
#4964
And another thing is, I cannot find out whether tessman and fischer run emulsion or bladder style, cause it would make a significant difference. But I dont know of any pro level drivers that run bladders so i would think their setups are emulsion?
#4965
Tech Regular
iTrader: (10)
I also thought 2 x 1.6 and 2 x 1.7 was too soft. I finally settled on 3 x 1.3 all around with 37.5 in the front and 32.5 in the back. I am happy with the front but the back is still a little soft. Might try 35 or am tempted to go 2 x 1.6 or 2 x 1.5 in the rear.
But so far the 3 holes are good and seem to work well in various conditions, med to med-high traction.
But so far the 3 holes are good and seem to work well in various conditions, med to med-high traction.