Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Hot Bodies D413 1/10 4WD Buggy >

Hot Bodies D413 1/10 4WD Buggy

Like Tree55Likes

Hot Bodies D413 1/10 4WD Buggy

Reply

Old 03-03-2014, 11:34 PM
  #1291  
Tech Master
iTrader: (39)
 
mebolson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The 208
Posts: 1,041
Trader Rating: 39 (100%+)
Default

I might have to get back into 4mod with this car
mebolson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2014, 11:35 PM
  #1292  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Eastvale, CA
Posts: 514
Default

Originally Posted by Jpm1 View Post
Can anyone tell me who's been involved in the testing what works better for low-med indoor clay, shorty or saddles, I figures the saddles would be heavier and give more rear grip?

Justin
Ty and myself have been doing most of the testing. saddles just makes the car less nimble. if you want more rear weight bias with shorties you can mount the battery in the rear-most position. with shorties there is also so much space to mount the esc - you can mount it all the way up front across the servo (Ty's setup) or all the way in the back behind the motor (my setup).

for a loose track though i'd play with the diff oils first rather than going to a heavier saddle setup.
T. Deguzman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2014, 11:40 PM
  #1293  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Eastvale, CA
Posts: 514
Default

Originally Posted by Jpm1 View Post
I understand it takes time to get the kit, manual and setups correct for sale and would prefer to wait a cpl of months so that it's perfect, Torrance has already said there won't be a stock spur gear available at launch, is there plans to have one available soonish after release or is there another option to modify an existing spur from another manufacturer? I would doubt it because of the centre diff option :-(

Justin
a 17.5 or slower stock 4wd class is quite rare. i'm going to wait and see how this class develops to see whether we'll need a smaller spur gear. usually when there is a stock class it's 13.5 which should work with the kit 72T spur.
T. Deguzman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2014, 12:02 AM
  #1294  
Tech Master
iTrader: (8)
 
Jpm1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,395
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by T. Deguzman View Post
Ty and myself have been doing most of the testing. saddles just makes the car less nimble. if you want more rear weight bias with shorties you can mount the battery in the rear-most position. with shorties there is also so much space to mount the esc - you can mount it all the way up front across the servo (Ty's setup) or all the way in the back behind the motor (my setup).

for a loose track though i'd play with the diff oils first rather than going to a heavier saddle setup.
Thanks for the answer Torrance, appreciate the support.

Cheers Justin
Jpm1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2014, 12:05 AM
  #1295  
Tech Master
iTrader: (8)
 
Jpm1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,395
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by T. Deguzman View Post
a 17.5 or slower stock 4wd class is quite rare. i'm going to wait and see how this class develops to see whether we'll need a smaller spur gear. usually when there is a stock class it's 13.5 which should work with the kit 72T spur.
We run 17.5 stock here in Australia, at my local track we chase a FDR of 5.70-6.00, maybe slightly lower will be ok with this buggy running a shorty and being light, maybe we can add a little more end bell timing to get the speed and drop a little bit of torque/punch.

Cheers Justin
Jpm1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2014, 03:16 AM
  #1296  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Eastvale, CA
Posts: 514
Default

Originally Posted by pullinteef View Post
I'm sure Ty could've turned some much faster laps than he did but when you're in the lead you don't push too hard. Everyone else had to make up ground and were pushing hard, obviously leading to more mistakes. Ty did exactly what you should do when in the lead.
i think he chose a longer lasting tire compound instead of the faster one just to make sure he can finish strong. he and Gord left the tire selection till the very last minute. very tough call to make.
T. Deguzman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2014, 03:18 AM
  #1297  
Tech Elite
 
targetingxmod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Europe - Portugual
Posts: 2,020
Default

Originally Posted by T. Deguzman View Post
hmmm dual shorties huh? i think it would fit. you'd need a second shorty battery tray & strap for the left side (the kit already comes with two pairs of posts). you can then use the battery tray as a template to drill one additional hole on the left side of chassis (needs to be countersunk at the bottom). or you can borrow a buddy's chassis and line them up back to back to transfer the shorty holes to the left.

a low profile servo would probably be needed to make room for the esc, then the receiver can be mounted on the upper deck.

you'd want to wire the batteries in parallel to keep the voltage in the 7.4v range. if you wire them in series like normal saddles.... oh man fasten your seatbelts.
Please, only reason is for 4s speed madness.... and the buggy will handle it fine cause it's a 3 metal diff rc!
I drive smaller rc's 1/14 and 1/16 with 4s in agressive racing speed runs and until now no wear or breakage from 4s and neu's, using always the ESC's programability to smooth throthle, and not bashing them! :P

2 shorty baterys in there are very easy to do by the look of pics... cause car ins't came out yet....And the second one i could just drill a 2 holes and ziptye her....

I know the race world only needs 2s and drive them all day long on 2s which is fine...but i am on the hobbie for speed and that's my driving style on rc's!

The idea of a wider or taller body might be interesting for clear....

But defenitly a low porfile servo... by the way this on pics is a normal servo right?

targetingxmod is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2014, 03:31 AM
  #1298  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Eastvale, CA
Posts: 514
Default

Originally Posted by ppascho View Post
First of all this is a very very interesting car and I am looking forward to its launch...
A question to Terrence, how will the arms hinge pins holders hold?
My terminology might not be accurate but I mean the pieces where the arms hinge pins are screwed to the bulkheads.
My beloved Cat SX3 is particularly weak at that point, very often bending screws, and I see with great interest that this magnificent new car has more or less the same concept. Appreciate your input on testing done so far..
sorry for the late reply I had been in nitro 1/8 mode the past few weeks. anyway the arm mounts are similar to some touring car designs but instead of just a plain hinge pin this uses a long bolt style pin with a nut on the end. just a smaller version of what we used on the D812.

on some hard hits the screw that connects the arm mount to the gearbox can bend. but I think that's an acceptable trade off because when the screw bends from an impact it absorbs a lot of energy, thus saving the arms and other parts from breakage. and since screws are the cheapest component i don't mind sacrificing them. usually it only happens to the FF mounts.
T. Deguzman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2014, 10:34 AM
  #1299  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 948
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

I was so hoping to have this car by cactus....

Oh well....I'll be here patiently waiting.

Still pretty stoked though!
Jason Snyder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 08:20 AM
  #1300  
Tech Master
iTrader: (18)
 
boudin4evr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: LA
Posts: 1,852
Trader Rating: 18 (100%+)
Default

whats the testing been like on low to med traction outdoors and indoors? shorty probably the best for this application and tuning with diff oils instead of saddle pack weight?
boudin4evr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 09:34 AM
  #1301  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
kdeleon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 429
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

I thought we were going to get a definitive date once these were on the boat from Asia. I would think that they would have to be on the boat by now to make an end of March date.

So can we get more details at this point? Or at the very least, preorder capabilities at some stores? Or maybe even the manual so that we have something to read over. I would think we could get more details by now instead of "it's coming".
kdeleon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 10:43 AM
  #1302  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (48)
 
lbenton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Fort Worth Tx
Posts: 2,132
Trader Rating: 48 (100%+)
Default



I have no idea exactly when...
lbenton is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 11:20 AM
  #1303  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Eastvale, CA
Posts: 514
Default

Originally Posted by boudin4evr View Post
whats the testing been like on low to med traction outdoors and indoors? shorty probably the best for this application and tuning with diff oils instead of saddle pack weight?
yes.
T. Deguzman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 01:20 PM
  #1304  
Team Tekin
iTrader: (18)
 
yzracer758's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tekin HQ
Posts: 3,030
Trader Rating: 18 (100%+)
Default

http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LXEBMZ
yzracer758 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 01:26 PM
  #1305  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (127)
 
RC*PHREAK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,754
Trader Rating: 127 (100%+)
Default

late april?

i do like the price though.
RC*PHREAK is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service