The Definitive answer of if a sensored 17.5 motor will work with a Castle Sidewinder.
#1
The Definitive answer of if a sensored 17.5 motor will work with a Castle Sidewinder.
No, it will not.
I did a lot of and saw a lot of searching for this answer with no one specifically trying it and giving a response.
I did a lot of and saw a lot of searching for this answer with no one specifically trying it and giving a response.
#2
why on earth would it?
sidewinder doesnt have provisions for/nor does it support sensored capable motors..
gotta get the MMP...
sidewinder doesnt have provisions for/nor does it support sensored capable motors..
gotta get the MMP...
#4
@FTSC10
People (including myself) were wondering, since it can run some sensored motors sensorless (fast ones 8.5t etc.)
People (including myself) were wondering, since it can run some sensored motors sensorless (fast ones 8.5t etc.)
#7
Wether it works or not heavily depends on how accurate the controller is.
i myself have quite a bunch of controller, so i've done many test's.
A Hobbywing Xerun 120 wont run a 17.5 without sensor.
A GM 75 wont do that either.
A Mamba max wont.
Then my Quark Plasma however does get a 17.5 going smooth without the sensor.
It appears that all controller that will run sensorless will run sensor motor's as long as they are somewhat faster, 10.5 and lower shouldn't be a problem.
FDR however has big effects too, the taller the car is geared the harder the motor is going to be to start.
the slower winds like 17.5 dont rev much at all and have not much EMF feedback for the controller to read out.
going slow with no sensor thus requires the ultimate software, wich AFAIK only Quark has.
i myself have quite a bunch of controller, so i've done many test's.
A Hobbywing Xerun 120 wont run a 17.5 without sensor.
A GM 75 wont do that either.
A Mamba max wont.
Then my Quark Plasma however does get a 17.5 going smooth without the sensor.
It appears that all controller that will run sensorless will run sensor motor's as long as they are somewhat faster, 10.5 and lower shouldn't be a problem.
FDR however has big effects too, the taller the car is geared the harder the motor is going to be to start.
the slower winds like 17.5 dont rev much at all and have not much EMF feedback for the controller to read out.
going slow with no sensor thus requires the ultimate software, wich AFAIK only Quark has.
#9
#10
Its not BS, it's the controller not the motor. my Quark doesn't take sensor, yet runs 17.5 flawless.
#12
Why is this discussion even being had? seriously..
a sensored motor was built for, and designed to be ran SENSORED..you will obviously see lackluster results from using a sensored motor on an unsensored ESC...IF it even works at all, which in my experience..they never do.
BUY a sensored ESC!
a sensored motor was built for, and designed to be ran SENSORED..you will obviously see lackluster results from using a sensored motor on an unsensored ESC...IF it even works at all, which in my experience..they never do.
BUY a sensored ESC!
#13
Tech Elite
iTrader: (79)
Why is this discussion even being had? seriously..
a sensored motor was built for, and designed to be ran SENSORED..you will obviously see lackluster results from using a sensored motor on an unsensored ESC...IF it even works at all, which in my experience..they never do.
BUY a sensored ESC!
a sensored motor was built for, and designed to be ran SENSORED..you will obviously see lackluster results from using a sensored motor on an unsensored ESC...IF it even works at all, which in my experience..they never do.
BUY a sensored ESC!
#14
Tech Elite
iTrader: (22)
http://www.teamnovak.com/tech_info/b...ensorless.html