lv4sndz
02-21-2014, 10:14 AM
#76
Beanstalk is still posting here and that tells me that he wants to do the right thing. There is nothing stopping him from just walking away from the forum and signing up again with a different screen name. He has only been here a short time, it's not like its a huge thing for him.
He is here posting on his own merits. He has no obligation to keep us informed. I think everyone should relax a bit. As long as the item gets sent back, I think beanstalk is good to go. This has been an aggregation for him and he wants to proceed carefully.
It sounds like everything will be ok (or so I hope).
He is here posting on his own merits. He has no obligation to keep us informed. I think everyone should relax a bit. As long as the item gets sent back, I think beanstalk is good to go. This has been an aggregation for him and he wants to proceed carefully.
It sounds like everything will be ok (or so I hope).
02-21-2014, 10:35 AM
#78
Beanstalk is still posting here and that tells me that he wants to do the right thing. There is nothing stopping him from just walking away from the forum and signing up again with a different screen name. He has only been here a short time, it's not like its a huge thing for him.
He is here posting on his own merits. He has no obligation to keep us informed. I think everyone should relax a bit. As long as the item gets sent back, I think beanstalk is good to go. This has been an aggregation for him and he wants to proceed carefully.
It sounds like everything will be ok (or so I hope).
He is here posting on his own merits. He has no obligation to keep us informed. I think everyone should relax a bit. As long as the item gets sent back, I think beanstalk is good to go. This has been an aggregation for him and he wants to proceed carefully.
It sounds like everything will be ok (or so I hope).
And no, I have not put him on an ignore list, and if I felt the need to do that I would not think it was necessary to post that either. In a way that bothers me as well.
02-21-2014, 10:57 AM
#79
He disputed this via PayPal and they gave him back the money in the end. But they told him to send me back the product. But he never sent it back. I have texted him on numerous occasions and even called him, sent emails messaged him here and no response. So who is the real scam artest here. Not me, I'm out $300.00 and don't have the buggy and have a less trader score on here now because of this. WTF
Lv4sndz not responding to a PayPal claim against him as a seller is a really big no-no. Is that actually what happened to cause this thread to reach 6+ pages?
I'm not familiar enough with PayPal rules to know if there are any potential loopholes, but I wouldn't be surprised if things turn out strongly against your favor if you don't respond to the PayPal claim.
02-21-2014, 11:25 AM
#80
As of now its my property....
That whole statement........
If you actually read it, hes saying that its his buggy but he wants to be nice. So if no one on here was ragging on this dude, I would bet a dollar he would keep it. I mean
its pretty plain text what hes saying.
02-21-2014, 11:25 AM
#81
<snip>So... Buyer beanstalk says PayPal ruled in his favor because of a complete lack of response from seller lv4sndz for 10 days after filing a PayPal claim for the item not being as described. Is that true? Or did lv4sndz simply agree to refund beanstalk if he returned the package?<snip>
I think it's interesting that lv4sndz was nowhere to be seen until Paypal reversed the payment. You can't send something back if the seller won't respond - now that he is responding beanstalk seems to be trying to do the right thing. I don't understand some of the earlier responses came down on beanstalk. I can't see where he did anything wrong?
02-21-2014, 11:39 AM
#82
remember?
He was wrong to believe that stuff I put in bold
And that took this drama into a sequel, maybe a trilogy...
But, I have every hope that this will end well enough where a couple of people had to eat some shipping cost and everybody will have their blood pressure go back down and things will get quiet again.
We should all remember that paypal does it's best to protect both parties in a deal, but if it came down to matter of rightful possession they are not law by any means.
As bad as this sounds its actually not his property anymore. He gave away this right when he did not follow the paypal regulations. However i see how this is unfair and im a nice guy so im willing to send it back. I will not just blindly send my buggy out to him only for him to say he did not recive it. If paypal is not willing to back him up neither am i. I need paypal to instruct me with what to do as far as returning the item. He has to contact paypal so they can contact me. As of now its my property he gave up certain rights when he signed the paypal contract. Im willing to send it back but im doing it in the proper manner.
And that took this drama into a sequel, maybe a trilogy...
But, I have every hope that this will end well enough where a couple of people had to eat some shipping cost and everybody will have their blood pressure go back down and things will get quiet again.
We should all remember that paypal does it's best to protect both parties in a deal, but if it came down to matter of rightful possession they are not law by any means.
02-21-2014, 12:03 PM
#83
This is worse than an 80's soap opera.
I think it's interesting that lv4sndz was nowhere to be seen until Paypal reversed the payment. You can't send something back if the seller won't respond - now that he is responding beanstalk seems to be trying to do the right thing. I don't understand some of the earlier responses came down on beanstalk. I can't see where he did anything wrong?
I think it's interesting that lv4sndz was nowhere to be seen until Paypal reversed the payment. You can't send something back if the seller won't respond - now that he is responding beanstalk seems to be trying to do the right thing. I don't understand some of the earlier responses came down on beanstalk. I can't see where he did anything wrong?
02-22-2014, 07:40 PM
#85
Well beanstalk agreed to send me the buggy back. Weither he actually does is a different story. I sent him $50 to cover shipping costs, wich is plenty more then needed. Now as long as I don't get a box full of bolts or a busted buggy ill be good. Only time will tell.
02-24-2014, 01:12 PM
#86
Well i sent him $50.00 "Friday night" to cover shipping but haven't heard anything from him yet. No return text, no return PM here or phone call. $50.00 was more then generous to ship it back. He is actually gonna make a little bit of money on shipping something back that should have been sent back a while ago. I think I'm getting F'ed on this again.........Great.
Last edited by racer1812; 02-24-2014 at 01:32 PM. Reason: language..
02-24-2014, 01:32 PM
#87
Super Moderator
iTrader: (31)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: RIP 'Chopper', 4/18/13 miss you bud:(
Posts: 15,463
Trader Rating: 31 (100%+)
watch the language
02-24-2014, 01:56 PM
#88
02-24-2014, 05:26 PM
#90
Time to call PP, send them his posts where he stated he was sending it back, also the one where he says it's "his" property, also you sent him shipping money for the return of the truck. Depending on their response, take the next step and contact the Police in his area, where you sent the truck. You will have to provide documentation of all PP's actions and also his posts here. Time to put an end to this. Time to take off the kids gloves. So get busy.
