SERCCC (Dandenong, VIC)

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

10-14-2004, 04:11 PM

#1501

OZDC

Tech Fanatic

iTrader: (16)

Join Date: Mar 2002

Location: Melbourne

Posts: 931

Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)

Quote:

Originally posted by Sp Racer
Results after round 5 of qualifyiing - world champs..

1 Adrien Bertin Sirio/Kyosho 33 10.04.361
2 Francesco Tironi Sirio/Kyosho 33 10.05.575
3 Josh Cyrul Sirio/Kyosho 33 10:05.592
4 Takaaki Shimo Sirio/Kyosho 33 10.07.294
5 David Spashett Sirio/Kyosho 33 10.07.935
6 Chris Tosolini Sirio/Kyosho 33 10.09.553
7 Massimo Fantini Serpent MAX 33 10.11.342
8 Mark Green Serpent Picco 33 10.14.896
9 Takuya Ito Sirio/Kyosho 33 10:17.383
10 Ken Furukawa Sirio/Kyosho 32 10:02.463

spot the mugen....

OK so how about $290, also includes a battery pack

10-14-2004, 08:13 PM

#1502

Sp Racer

Tech Master

iTrader: (12)

Join Date: Dec 2002

Location: Melbourne, Australia

Posts: 1,657

Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)

Quote:

Spot the FW!

Takuya Ito is still using the FW05 .......

10-14-2004, 08:36 PM

#1503

OZDC

Tech Fanatic

iTrader: (16)

Join Date: Mar 2002

Location: Melbourne

Posts: 931

Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)

Quote:

Originally posted by Sp Racer
Results after round 5 of qualifyiing - world champs..

spot the mugen....

Actually on this topic, it seems there are some very notable teams not present, and only 86 or so competitors, so i think starting a 'brand' war based on these results is not realy fair, no matter which brand wins.

Pick the Mugen Driver

BTW No Aussies, whats up with that.

Last edited by OZDC; 10-14-2004 at 08:43 PM.

10-14-2004, 09:08 PM

#1504

Franky

Tech Addict

Join Date: Jun 2003

Location: VIC Melbourne

Posts: 579

Trader Rating: 0

10-14-2004, 09:09 PM

#1505

Franky

Tech Addict

Join Date: Jun 2003

Location: VIC Melbourne

Posts: 579

Trader Rating: 0

10-14-2004, 09:12 PM

#1506

Franky

Tech Addict

Join Date: Jun 2003

Location: VIC Melbourne

Posts: 579

Trader Rating: 0

illegal refuel ?

any stop and go ?

10-14-2004, 10:48 PM

#1507

OZDC

Tech Fanatic

iTrader: (16)

Join Date: Mar 2002

Location: Melbourne

Posts: 931

Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)

Yeah its probably the camera angle but i thought the same thing.

DC

10-14-2004, 10:53 PM

#1508

OZDC

Tech Fanatic

iTrader: (16)

Join Date: Mar 2002

Location: Melbourne

Posts: 931

Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)

Illegal Refuelling hole?

Quote:

Originally posted by Franky

I know it must be legal cause other drivers than Swauger have the same type of hole, but AARCMCC rules state that the cooling hole in the windscreen cant 'intrude into the roof or bonnet'.

Is IFMAR different? Cant find the rules anywhere.

Just curious

DC

10-14-2004, 10:58 PM

#1509

Taylor-Racing

Tech Elite

Join Date: Sep 2002

Location: Melbourne OZ

Posts: 2,066

Trader Rating: 0

Re: Illegal Refuelling hole?

Quote:

Originally posted by OZDC
I know it must be legal cause other drivers than Swauger have the same type of hole, but AARCMCC rules state that the cooling hole in the windscreen cant 'intrude into the roof or bonnet'.

Is IFMAR different? Cant find the rules anywhere.

Just curious

DC

Hmmm . . . Maybe they call that the re-fuel hole. I guess there's nothing to say you "must" have a cooling hole.

10-14-2004, 11:01 PM

#1510

Taylor-Racing

Tech Elite

Join Date: Sep 2002

Location: Melbourne OZ

Posts: 2,066

Trader Rating: 0

Quote:

Originally posted by Sp Racer
Takuya Ito is still using the FW05 .......

Yes, he's not the only one persisting with them.

10-14-2004, 11:03 PM

#1511

OZDC

Tech Fanatic

iTrader: (16)

Join Date: Mar 2002

Location: Melbourne

Posts: 931

Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)

Re: Re: Illegal Refuelling hole?

Quote:

Originally posted by Taylor-Racing
Hmmm . . . Maybe they call that the re-fuel hole. I guess there's nothing to say you "must" have a cooling hole.

Possibly, it doesnt say where the refuelling hole should be.

DC

10-14-2004, 11:05 PM

#1512

Taylor-Racing

Tech Elite

Join Date: Sep 2002

Location: Melbourne OZ

Posts: 2,066

Trader Rating: 0

Quote:

Originally posted by OZDC
Actually on this topic, it seems there are some very notable teams not present, and only 86 or so competitors, so i think starting a 'brand' war based on these results is not realy fair, no matter which brand wins.

Pick the Mugen Driver

BTW No Aussies, whats up with that.

DC

He started it!

But, yeah, no Aussies.
Even though there's only 86 drivers it would have made a good warm-up event for the DUDY Cup.

10-14-2004, 11:13 PM

#1513

Taylor-Racing

Tech Elite

Join Date: Sep 2002

Location: Melbourne OZ

Posts: 2,066

Trader Rating: 0

Re: Re: Re: Illegal Refuelling hole?

Quote:

Originally posted by OZDC
Possibly, it doesnt say where the refuelling hole should be.

DC

There might be an angle here. Don't know if the rules have been updated recently.

AARCMCC IC Rules V1.1 (Aug. 03)

1.15 Only the following AIR HOLES and sizes are permitted in the body shells:
One (1) hole, for cooling may be cut in the front windscreen,
(not intruding on either the roof or bonnet), with a maximum
opening of 50% of the total windscreen area.
15.00mm (maximum diameter) hole in the roof for glow plug access.
Both front side windows and the rear window can be removed for ventilation,
except for the side rear windows, which must remain intact.
Re-fuelling hole, maximum 50.00mm diameter. Small holes can be made for the
exhaust pipe,

Transponder and radio antenna. No other holes are permitted.

10-15-2004, 04:22 AM

#1514

sparksy

Tech Master

iTrader: (14)

Join Date: Oct 2001

Location: Brisvagas

Posts: 1,989

Trader Rating: 14 (94%+)

Quote:

I know it must be legal cause other drivers than Swauger have the same type of hole, but AARCMCC rules state that the cooling hole in the windscreen cant 'intrude into the roof or bonnet'.

Whats worse... place your refuling hole where it is needed for a fuel gun or 50% of your window like our stupid rules?